[Bug c++/29139] New: GCC produces wrong code with SSE / inline functions

2006-09-19 Thread jespdj at hotmail dot com
Version: 4.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jespdj at hotmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29139

[Bug c++/29139] GCC produces wrong code with SSE / inline functions

2006-09-19 Thread jespdj at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from jespdj at hotmail dot com 2006-09-19 11:33 --- Created an attachment (id=12294) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12294&action=view) Source code that demonstrates the bug This is the source code that demonstrates bug 29139. --

[Bug c++/29139] GCC produces wrong code with SSE / inline functions

2006-09-19 Thread jespdj at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from jespdj at hotmail dot com 2006-09-19 11:34 --- Created an attachment (id=12295) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12295&action=view) Precompiled source (*.ii) Precompiled code for gccbug.cpp of bug 29139. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/b

[Bug target/29139] GCC produces wrong code with SSE / inline functions

2006-09-21 Thread jespdj at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from jespdj at hotmail dot com 2006-09-22 06:51 --- I've been looking at my code some more time, and I noticed that there are bugs in it. For example, I'm not using the '&' early clobber modifier in the embedded asm, which is necessary if the ou

[Bug target/29139] GCC produces wrong code with SSE / inline functions

2006-09-21 Thread jespdj at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from jespdj at hotmail dot com 2006-09-22 06:51 --- Marking this bug as invalid. -- jespdj at hotmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/29249] New: Alignment error with static const variable in inline function

2006-09-27 Thread jespdj at hotmail dot com
nent: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jespdj at hotmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29249

[Bug c++/29249] Alignment error with static const variable in inline function

2006-09-27 Thread jespdj at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #1 from jespdj at hotmail dot com 2006-09-27 08:55 --- Created an attachment (id=12336) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12336&action=view) Source code that demonstrates the bug -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29249

[Bug c++/29249] Alignment error with static const variable in inline function

2006-09-27 Thread jespdj at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #2 from jespdj at hotmail dot com 2006-09-27 08:55 --- Created an attachment (id=12337) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12337&action=view) Precompiled source (*.ii) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29249

[Bug target/29249] Alignment error with static const variable in inline function

2006-09-27 Thread jespdj at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from jespdj at hotmail dot com 2006-09-27 21:11 --- Created an attachment (id=12342) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12342&action=view) output of g++ tst.cpp -S Here is the assembler source produced with g++ tst.cpp -S At the bottom of the

[Bug target/29249] Alignment error with static const variable in inline function

2006-09-27 Thread jespdj at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from jespdj at hotmail dot com 2006-09-27 21:12 --- Created an attachment (id=12343) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12343&action=view) assembly source without "inline" This is the assembly file I get when I compile without "

[Bug target/29249] Alignment error with static const variable in inline function

2006-09-28 Thread jespdj at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from jespdj at hotmail dot com 2006-09-28 07:45 --- Ok, I filed a bug report for binutils about this. http://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3276 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29249