atus: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jd at cococo dot de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44681
--- Comment #3 from jd at cococo dot de 2010-06-30 10:32 ---
You are right - it was a matter of bracketing. After having changed the macro
to
#define max(a,b)(a>b?a:b)
it works fine on MingW and Linux.
The problem lies in an incompatibility between to Delphi 2010. Del
--- Comment #5 from jd at cococo dot de 2010-06-30 13:43 ---
Which is the standard C operator precedence? It should not depend on the
dialect. Is there a pragma for it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44681
--- Comment #7 from jd at cococo dot de 2010-06-30 16:47 ---
Sorry, I was not precise enough. Delphi is the IDE for both, Pascal and C, and
what I meant by the word are the language(s) Borland C and C++. They have an
option for Standard C. Maybe I misunderstood it ...
--
http
--- Comment #9 from jd at cococo dot de 2010-07-01 05:37 ---
Ok, but in terms of semantics there is only one way of interpreting the
sentence
nr <= left->rows > right->rows ? left->rows : right->rows
because we have to differ between conditions yielding truth valu
