[Bug c++/57271] New: ARM: gcc generates insufficient alignment for memory passed as extra argument for function return large composite type

2013-05-14 Thread java4ada at yahoo dot com
: 4.8.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: java4ada at yahoo dot com Created attachment 30109 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30109&

[Bug c++/57271] ARM: gcc generates insufficient alignment for memory passed as extra argument for function return large composite type

2013-05-14 Thread java4ada at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57271 --- Comment #2 from java4ada at yahoo dot com --- I don't know if ABI dictates it but from observation the stack is aligned to 8-byte for the largest primitive type "double" (or long long). I configure it on Ubuntu 12.04

[Bug c++/57271] ARM: gcc generates insufficient alignment for memory passed as extra argument for function return large composite type

2013-05-14 Thread java4ada at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57271 --- Comment #5 from java4ada at yahoo dot com --- NEON instructions like vst/vld [:128] and [:256] need 16-byte and 32-byte alignment, respectively. Does it mean under ARM EABI both should be replaced with [:64] ? (Probably only at the cost of 1

[Bug c/61280] New: GCC 4.8.2 suppresses -Wsign-compare caused by macro defined in system header

2014-05-21 Thread java4ada at yahoo dot com
: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: java4ada at yahoo dot com It seems that since 4.8 GCC grants -Wsign-compare immunity to macro defined in system header. To reproduce it: $ cat > test.h < test.c <

[Bug target/61202] gcc generates invalid sqdmulh instruction

2014-05-27 Thread java4ada at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61202 java4ada at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||java4ada at yahoo dot com

[Bug libgomp/42616] OMP'ed loop inside pthread leads to crash.

2014-11-27 Thread java4ada at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42616 java4ada at yahoo dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||java4ada at yahoo dot com

[Bug libgomp/42616] OMP'ed loop inside pthread leads to crash.

2014-12-24 Thread java4ada at yahoo dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42616 --- Comment #17 from java4ada at yahoo dot com --- Is this fixed by https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc?view=revision&revision=218576 ?