http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56782
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56749
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56746
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|NEW
AssignedTo|jason at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
||gnu.org
--- Comment #56 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-30
00:30:38 UTC ---
I still hope to get to this, but I don't anticipate it being a high pri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56774
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
||2013-04-01
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45917
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55241
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55931
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55240
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55017
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54946
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54532
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56794
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56793
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56772
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56698
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56698
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #18 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-02
21:10:55 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.9.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50243
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-02
21:19:18 UTC ---
Created attachment 29782
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29782
possible patch
The patches we checked in today for 34949 almost fix this bug as well, but n
||2013-04-03
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56821
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34949
--- Comment #26 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-03
13:37:51 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #25)
> Looking at it more, if the change to emit *this ={v} {CLOBBER}; in cleanups
> rather than just at the end of function was desirable, then IMHO we ju
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56815
--- Comment #18 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-03
13:45:57 UTC ---
void arithmetic is a deliberate GNU extension, so it should be a pedwarn rather
than permerror.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25466
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-03
17:21:52 UTC ---
I guess it depends on the meaning of "obtained". If "obtained" refers to the
form of the expression, G++ is following the standard. If it refers to the
place where the pointe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56728
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-04
12:28:49 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> If it's fixed for 4.8.1 it's obviously fixed in mainline too. We don't ICE
> anymore, we simply reject the snippet due to the reinterpret_cast from in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56838
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
--- Comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56838
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-05
14:37:52 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> The candidate in /usr/include/boost/bind/bind.hpp:1478 a.cpp:92092 fails.
> SFINAE so this candidate is skipped.
Actually, it doesn't fail SFINAE.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51582
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-05
15:18:10 UTC ---
This was fixed on the trunk by
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177073
I put a simpler variant on the 4.6 branch to fix 49924, but that didn't fix
this i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53786
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51239
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mustrumr97 at gmail dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51582
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-06
16:08:28 UTC ---
Created attachment 29816
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29816
patch
Here's a fix. I'm not going to apply it to the 4.6 branch because C++11 users
reall
||17232
Resolution||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Summary|GCC svn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17232
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED
Resolution|FIX
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52072
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-09
12:32:58 UTC ---
Yes.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 56838 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56838
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeratul976 at hotmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25466
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-09
17:32:49 UTC ---
Mind if I take this one?
,
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-09
17:39:22 UTC ---
Dodji, please take a look at this one too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-09
18:03:47 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Introduced by my http://gcc.gnu.org/r195051 , potential_constant_expression
> returns true about it, because fun in a call expr isn't a FUNCTION_DECL.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56895
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-09
18:49:28 UTC ---
OK.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25466
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52072
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23055
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler at
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
,
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-11
02:41:22 UTC ---
Another alias issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56904
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56904
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-11
02:54:34 UTC ---
See also DR 125:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#125
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51239
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-11
15:19:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 29859
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29859
initial patch
This patch takes the approach the committee seems to be settling on for 1430:
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-11
16:51:12 UTC
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23055
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56388
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56388
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52748
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56857
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56901
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rmansfield at qnx dot com
--- C
||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-22
20:57:49 UTC ---
Fixed by
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
||2013-04-25
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #11 from Jason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57064
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-25
17:50:52 UTC ---
Fixed.
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56450
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-04-29
14:03:25 UTC ---
Let's put this into 4.8.1 as well; it's completely safe.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53220
--- Comment #21 from Jason Merrill 2013-05-01
19:13:19 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #20)
> I wrote some code which compiled perfectly using gcc 4.7. However, now I am
> using gcc 4.8 and I am encountering exactly the problem mentioned by P
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35405
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed.
|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 4.8.1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57138
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
This seems like another instance of bug 51239/DR 1430, which seems likely to be
resolved to make this code ill-formed.
|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Capturing a VLA by reference is implemented for 4.9; capturing by copy is
ill-formed.
||2013-05-10
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 4.9 so far
|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54320
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54320
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to vincenzo Innocente from comment #3)
> int foo2(int N) {
> int v[N];
> for ( auto a : v)
> if (a) return a;
> return 0;
> }
>
> works, though was similar to std::begin(v) std::end(v)
S
||2013-05-13
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15882
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #12)
> Jason sent the issue to the reflector as c++std-core-13788 but I don't see
> any indication it made it onto the issues list.
I'll poke Mike about it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57196
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|4.9.0 |4.8.1
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 4.8.1.
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 4.8.1.
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 4.8.1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57255
Bug 57255 depends on bug 57253, which changed state.
Bug 57253 Summary: GCC ignores ref-qualifiers of pseudo-function types in
explicit specializations
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57253
What|Removed
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 4.8.1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57255
Bug 57255 depends on bug 57254, which changed state.
Bug 57254 Summary: Overload resolution failure when ref-qualified member
function templates are defined out-of-line
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57254
What|Remove
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57252
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57255
Bug 57255 depends on bug 57252, which changed state.
Bug 57252 Summary: GCC does not treat ref-qualified overload set as ambiguous
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57252
What|Removed |Added
--
||2013-05-13
CC||hubicka at ucw dot cz,
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
This difference is caused by
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 4.8.1.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 57041 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57041
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jasongross9+bugzilla@gmail.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31952
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #9)
> After Janis' patch (see Comment #6) in pushdecl_maybe_friend_1 we issue hard
> errors for some kinds of shadowings but not for others. For comparison,
> clang iss
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 4.8.1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51213
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2012-08-25
03:30:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Aug 25 03:30:11 2012
New Revision: 190664
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190664
Log:
PR c++/51213 (again)
* pt.c (deduction_tsu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54376
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50545
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2012-08-31
02:50:33 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Aug 31 02:50:28 2012
New Revision: 190830
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190830
Log:
PR c++/50545
PR c++/51222
* pt.c (insta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51222
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2012-08-31
02:50:35 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Aug 31 02:50:28 2012
New Revision: 190830
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190830
Log:
PR c++/50545
PR c++/51222
* pt.c (insta
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51222
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
801 - 900 of 8296 matches
Mail list logo