http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55680
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-14
04:30:36 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 14 04:30:26 2013
New Revision: 196042
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196042
Log:
PR c++/55680
* pt.c (maybe_proc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55670
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-14
04:31:14 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 14 04:31:03 2013
New Revision: 196043
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196043
Log:
PR c++/55670
* parser.c (cp_par
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-14
14:03:11 UTC ---
This test crashes with no warning flags; the crash
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55232
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
01:26:39 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 15 01:26:34 2013
New Revision: 196064
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196064
Log:
PR c++/55232
* error.c (find_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55223
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
01:26:49 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 15 01:26:44 2013
New Revision: 196065
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196065
Log:
PR c++/55223
gcc/cp/
* pt.c (t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56323
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
01:27:09 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 15 01:27:03 2013
New Revision: 196067
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196067
Log:
PR c++/56323
* name-lookup.c (d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55220
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
01:27:20 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 15 01:27:12 2013
New Revision: 196068
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196068
Log:
PR c++/55220
* pt.c (unify): A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55003
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
01:27:44 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 15 01:27:36 2013
New Revision: 196069
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196069
Log:
PR c++/55003
* decl.c (cp_finis
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
01:27:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 15 01:27:47 2013
New Revision: 196070
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196070
Log:
PR c++/54922
* semantics.c (bu
||2013-02-15
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Summary|[C++11] Destructor |[4.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
16:17:31 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 15 16:17:25 2013
New Revision: 196081
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196081
Log:
PR c++/52026
* semantics.c (fi
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||WORKSFORME
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
17:16:39 UTC ---
You can use -pedantic-errors to turn this and various other violations from
warnings into errors.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56343
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
17:19:56 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 15 17:19:45 2013
New Revision: 196082
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196082
Log:
PR c++/56343
* class.c (check_b
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56343
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56135
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
18:31:41 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 15 18:31:28 2013
New Revision: 196085
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196085
Log:
PR c++/56135
* pt.c (tsubst_cop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55710
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
18:32:05 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 15 18:31:52 2013
New Revision: 196086
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196086
Log:
PR c++/55710
* semantics.c (ma
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52026
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
18:32:25 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 15 18:32:12 2013
New Revision: 196087
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196087
Log:
PR c++/52026
* semantics.c (fi
||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.3
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
18:39:10 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.7.3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
19:22:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 15 19:22:14 2013
New Revision: 196091
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196091
Log:
PR c++/54276
* semantics.c (fin
||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
19:23:32 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.8.
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
19:25:31 UTC ---
Created attachment 29472
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29472
patch
I'll be checking this in a
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
19:28:07 UTC ---
Fixed in 4.8 for
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
19:29:29 UTC ---
Created attachment 29473
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29473
55931.patch
Patch waiting for 4.8
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55879
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status
||2013-02-15
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
19:32:14 UTC ---
Created
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
19:33:33 UTC ---
Created attachment 29475
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29475
55240.patch
Patch waiting for 4.8
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
19:35:40 UTC ---
Created attachment 29476
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29476
p
Patch waiting for 4.8 to branch.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54922
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thomasmckee5 at gmail dot
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-15
19:37:57 UTC ---
In 4.7 and up, this testcase only shows the bug 54922 error.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 54922 ***
||2013-02-15
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54835
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-16
02:08:00 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Feb 16 02:07:55 2013
New Revision: 196101
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196101
Log:
PR c++/54276
* semantics.c (fin
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54276
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.8.0 |4.7.3
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Summary|[C++11] Explicit default|[C++11][DR 1518] Explicit
|constructors not respected |default constructors not
|during
||2013-02-22
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-22
14:48:06 UTC ---
Created
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35022
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56427
Bug #: 56427
Summary: [C++11] template template parameter template parameter
pack that depends on another parameter pack
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-22
21:02:04 UTC ---
Any news on this bug? It's one of only a few P1 regressions left.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56395
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-22
22:24:05 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 22 22:23:56 2013
New Revision: 196228
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196228
Log:
PR c++/56395
* tree.c (strip_ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56359
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-22
22:24:26 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 22 22:24:10 2013
New Revision: 196229
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196229
Log:
PR c++/56359
* call.c (can_conv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56377
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-22
22:24:40 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 22 22:24:27 2013
New Revision: 196230
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196230
Log:
PR c++/56377
* pt.c (fn_type_un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40405
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-22
22:24:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 22 22:24:40 2013
New Revision: 196231
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196231
Log:
PR c++/40405
* pt.c (push_templ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56395
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-22
22:26:19 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 22 22:26:08 2013
New Revision: 196232
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196232
Log:
PR c++/56395
* tree.c (strip_ty
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40405
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-22
22:26:38 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 22 22:26:20 2013
New Revision: 196233
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196233
Log:
PR c++/40405
* pt.c (push_templ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56395
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56377
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56359
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|4.6.4 |4.7.3
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-23
01:59:53 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.7.3.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56403
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-23
05:22:22 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Alternatively build_zero_init_1 could use RECORD_OR_UNION_CODE_P (TREE_CODE
> (type)) instead of CLASS_TYPE_P (type).
That makes sense to me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56427
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.3.0 |4.8.0
--- Comment #1 from Jason
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56447
Bug #: 56447
Summary: [C++11] Lambda in template has conversion op it
shouldn't have
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56447
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56438
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-26
04:27:49 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 26 04:27:40 2013
New Revision: 196274
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196274
Log:
PR c++/56438
* semantics.c (pot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56377
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-26
04:28:04 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Feb 26 04:27:51 2013
New Revision: 196275
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196275
Log:
PR c++/56377
* pt.c (fn_type_un
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56377
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56438
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37237
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-26
04:35:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #11)
> What I'd like to know is what is guaranteed.
> Previously gcc didn't emit the linkage name for any destructor -- but
> this would make the proposed
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-26
18:04:27 UTC ---
Same issue as 56358.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 56358 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56358
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lucdanton at free dot fr
--- Co
|jason at redhat dot com |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-26
18:27:14 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.8.
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Known to fail||
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56358
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-27
18:13:36 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 27 18:13:24 2013
New Revision: 196316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196316
Log:
PR c++/56358
PR c++/56323
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56323
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-27
18:13:34 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Feb 27 18:13:24 2013
New Revision: 196316
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196316
Log:
PR c++/56358
PR c++/56323
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-28
16:01:28 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 28 16:01:09 2013
New Revision: 196343
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196343
Log:
PR c++/56243
* call.c (build_ov
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56481
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-28
20:21:36 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 28 20:21:23 2013
New Revision: 196358
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196358
Log:
PR c++/56481
* semantics.c (pot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56243
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56481
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-02-28
20:36:54 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Feb 28 20:36:47 2013
New Revision: 196359
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196359
Log:
PR c++/56481
* g++.dg/cpp0x/con
||2013-03-01
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-01
03:04:25 UTC ---
Confirmed: "if only one is null, they compare unequal."
Th
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-04
03:12:05 UTC ---
Not a duplicate. 54367 is the case where there is no 'this', this bug is the
case where 'this' is for a NSDMI.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56403
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-04
17:02:23 UTC ---
The fix seems extremely safe, so I think backporting to 4.6 and 4.7 makes
sense.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56464
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-04
17:12:47 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 4 17:12:32 2013
New Revision: 196437
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196437
Log:
PR c++/56464
PR c++/54383
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54383
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-04
17:12:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 4 17:12:32 2013
New Revision: 196437
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196437
Log:
PR c++/56464
PR c++/54383
||FIXED
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-04
17:14:22 UTC ---
Fixed for 4.8.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54383
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-04
18:10:39 UTC ---
56447 has a more compact testcase.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 56447 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56447
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||temtaime at gmail dot com
--- C
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-04
18:15:07 UTC ---
Same issue as 51494.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 51494 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51494
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vladimir.bayda at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-05
15:41:15 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #13)
> What is supposed to be tested? Should the whole test skipped on darwin or only
> the dg-final?
The whole test; the test is verifying that the x86
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50276
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-05
17:46:53 UTC ---
Related to 51494.
|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50276
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-05
18:58:41 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 5 18:58:36 2013
New Revision: 196472
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=196472
Log:
PR c++/50276
* g++.dg/cpp0x/lam
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53363
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill 2013-03-05
19:01:18 UTC ---
If it's easier to just disable the dg-final, that's fine too.
|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2013-03-05
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51884
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51884
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Sum
601 - 700 of 8296 matches
Mail list logo