http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46472
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merril
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-20
23:07:27 UTC ---
Got it.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46472
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-20
23:18:06 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 20 23:18:01 2011
New Revision: 170348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170348
Log:
PR c++/46472
* method.c (process_subob_fn):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-20
23:18:16 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 20 23:18:11 2011
New Revision: 170349
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170349
Log:
PR c++/47703
* error.c (location_of): Handl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47703
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46472
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46831
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merril
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46831
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-21
01:50:44 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 21 01:50:39 2011
New Revision: 170354
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170354
Log:
PR c++/46831
* call.c (convert_class_to_ref
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46472
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dev.lists at jessamine dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47199
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-21
05:26:01 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 21 05:25:56 2011
New Revision: 170356
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170356
Log:
PR c++/47199
* semantics.c (cxx_eval_call_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46790
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-21
05:30:18 UTC ---
We control lots of things based on whether or not the other tools support a
particular feature. Doing the same for this issue doesn't seem strange at all
to me.
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-21
14:26:06 UTC ---
Fixed.
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-21
15:11:14 UTC ---
Mine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47207
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-21
15:35:52 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 21 15:35:44 2011
New Revision: 170365
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170365
Log:
PR c++/47207
* decl2.c (decl_constant_var_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47897
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merril
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47897
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-27
08:13:22 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 27 08:13:16 2011
New Revision: 170532
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170532
Log:
PR c++/47897
* semantics.c (non_const_var_e
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47904
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-27
08:13:32 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 27 08:13:28 2011
New Revision: 170533
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170533
Log:
PR c++/47904
* tree.c (cp_tree_equal): Comp
||2011.02.27 08:15:47
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-27
08:15:47 UTC ---
Ah, that would be because darwin doesn't support the ABI forward-compatib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47906
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-27
14:39:17 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 27 14:39:15 2011
New Revision: 170543
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170543
Log:
PR c++/47906
* g++.dg/abi/mangle39.C: Speci
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47906
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47904
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-27
17:11:22 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Sun Feb 27 17:11:19 2011
New Revision: 170544
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170544
Log:
PR c++/47904
* tree.c (cp_tree_equal) [PARM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47904
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-27
17:12:45 UTC ---
Looking.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47906
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-28
06:55:11 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 28 06:55:08 2011
New Revision: 170556
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170556
Log:
PR c++/47906
* g++.dg/cpp0x/trailing1.C: Sp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47873
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill 2011-02-28
21:41:24 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Feb 28 21:41:21 2011
New Revision: 170576
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170576
Log:
PR c++/47873
* class.c (update_vtable_entr
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46282
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-01
22:44:30 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 1 22:44:26 2011
New Revision: 170600
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170600
Log:
PR c++/46282
* decl2.c (grokbitfield): Hand
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47851
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-01
22:44:41 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Mar 1 22:44:35 2011
New Revision: 170601
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170601
Log:
PR c++/47851
* call.c (standard_conversion)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46282
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47851
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46159
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47200
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-02
18:18:35 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 2 18:18:31 2011
New Revision: 170620
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170620
Log:
PR c++/47200
* semantics.c (cxx_bind_parame
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46159
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-02
18:18:48 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 2 18:18:41 2011
New Revision: 170621
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170621
Log:
PR c++/46159
* parser.c (cp_parser_primary_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46159
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-02
18:46:04 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Mar 2 18:46:01 2011
New Revision: 170622
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170622
Log:
PR c++/46159
* parser.c (cp_parser_primary_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46159
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47873
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-03
02:49:30 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 3 02:49:28 2011
New Revision: 170639
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170639
Log:
PR c++/47950
* parser.c (cp_parser_conditio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47774
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-03
02:49:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 3 02:49:19 2011
New Revision: 170638
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170638
Log:
PR c++/47774
* tree.c (build_vec_init_elt):
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47950
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-03
16:51:23 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Mar 3 16:51:20 2011
New Revision: 170656
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170656
Log:
PR c++/47950
* pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merril
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47957
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-03
23:43:11 UTC ---
Dodji, can you take a look at this one?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47971
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to fail||
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-04
00:54:56 UTC ---
Same ICE on valid testcase:
template int cmp1(T a, T b);
template int cmp2(T a, T b);
template struct A { };
template void f (A
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-04
15:18:03 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 4 15:17:55 2011
New Revision: 170676
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170676
Log:
PR c++/46220
* search.c (check_final_overri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47971
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-04
15:18:12 UTC ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Mar 4 15:18:07 2011
New Revision: 170677
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170677
Log:
PR c++/47971
* pt.c (tsubst_copy_and_build)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44629
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-04
22:24:30 UTC ---
Created attachment 23550
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23550
WIP patch to accept my testcase
Here's a patch that makes my testcase work. I don't want to put it
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44629
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-04
22:30:16 UTC ---
Created attachment 23551
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23551
WIP patch to make the testcase sorry as before
And here's a patch that just restores the previous so
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46220
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17314
--- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill ---
Yes, that would be an improvement to the diagnostic. But it seems to me that
there's a deeper issue here: I think both testcases should be ill-formed
because C::C can't form a pointer to its A base in order
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17314
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill ---
Actually, this seems to be issue 7:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_closed.html#7
So we should reject the variant with a public constructor as well. It would be
good to get the same diagn
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17314
--- Comment #18 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #17)
> It would be good to get the same diagnostic as in comment #4.
And also give a warning about the private virtual base.
||2013-05-16
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
Ever confirmed|0 |1
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-05-20
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Paul Pluzhnikov from comment #0
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed the false positive for 4.8.1.
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.4
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 4.7.4/4.8.1/4.9.
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|[4.8/4.9] Regression: bogus |[4.8 Regression]: bogus
|"defaulted move assignment |"defaulted move assignment
|for ... calls a non-trivial |for ... calls a non-trivial
|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed.
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed.
gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
This language issue was fixed by N3323, and implemented for GCC 4.9.
||2013-05-22
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
Summary|regression: pointless |[4.8/4.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56930
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.8/4.9 regression]|[4.8 regression] pointless
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed.
||2013-05-23
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57319
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Paul Pluzhnikov from comment #3)
> Can this be back-ported to 4.8 branch?
After 4.8.1, I think.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57317
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Paul Pluzhnikov from comment #3)
> but nothing on 4_8-branch.
Look again; it's commit 199104 on gcc-4_8-branch.
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57391
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 4.9.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57388
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||4.9.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 4.9.
|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57391
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56930
Bug 56930 depends on bug 57391, which changed state.
Bug 57391 Summary: [4.9 Regression] ICE compiling AIX math.h caused by PR
c++/56930
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57391
What|Removed |Added
---
gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Created attachment 30230
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30230&action=edit
patch
Could you test this?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54812
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
Various places in the compiler need to be updated to not assume that trivial
implies callable.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57319
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56930
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55776
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52119
--- Comment #11 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to ajf from comment #10)
> MY apologies if I am missing something obvious, but what exactly makes
> shifting a 1 into the sign bit undefined behavior?
You're right, it isn't:
5.8/2: ... if E1 has
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52119
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jeffrey Yasskin from comment #12)
> http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3675.html#1457
> changed this between C++11 and C++14.
True, but the defect report applies to C++11.
|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2013-06-07
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55520
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55149
--- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to David Abdurachmanov from comment #9)
I addressed example 1 in 55520.
Please provide a self-contained testcase for example 2.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41725
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41725
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|SUSPENDED
Resolution|INVALID
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jason at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57551
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #6)
> Jason, can you please look at
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-06/msg00433.html
I approved it the same day you posted it. :)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48453
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[C++0x] Invalid reference |[C++0x] [DR 1287] Invalid
|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
The issue here is that this capture is not valid C++1y because an array bound
other than the first one is non-constant. Current 4.9 gives an
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #5 from Jason Mer
|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.2
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed for 4.8.2/4.9
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
1001 - 1100 of 8296 matches
Mail list logo
