http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
--- Comment #19 from Zouzou 2013-03-24 20:56:40
UTC ---
Hi,
This appears to have been fixed. I can no longer reproduce it with GCC 4.8 and
GDB 7.5.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47169
Summary: cannot deduce base class functions from a lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: una
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308
Zouzou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||internet at 123gen dot com
--- Comment #18 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53578
--- Comment #12 from Zouzou 2012-06-29 14:16:16
UTC ---
applying the changes in rev 188646 to a MinGW with GCC 4.7.0 works fine and
doesn't reproduce the problem detailed in bug 46455.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455
Summary: shared_ptr consuming too many semaphores on Windows
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assign
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455
--- Comment #3 from Zouzou 2010-11-12 20:56:14 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> What's the value of __gnu_cxx::__default_lock_policy on Mingw?
> Is it the same for GCC 4.4 and 4.5?
it is 1 on both.
(i got it using std::cout << __gnu_cxx::__def
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455
--- Comment #8 from Zouzou 2010-11-15 13:38:39 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #2)
> > What's the value of __gnu_cxx::__default_lock_policy on Mingw?
> > Is it the same for GCC 4.4 and 4.5?
> >
> > Between 4.4 and 4.5 the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455
--- Comment #9 from Zouzou 2010-11-15 13:46:33 UTC
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Could you try this, which is a simplified version of the shared_ptr
> refcounting
> code and should have the same behaviour:
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455
--- Comment #11 from Zouzou 2010-11-15 16:30:21
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> That's because my simpler test ignores the default_lock_policy, it always uses
> a mutex, which is what shared_ptr does when __default_lock_policy=1
> I've just l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455
--- Comment #17 from Zouzou 2010-11-16 08:37:02
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #16)
> Created attachment 22413 [details]
> add destructors in
> could you try applying this patch to ext/concurrence.h and let me know if it
> works on Windows? I'm t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455
--- Comment #24 from Zouzou 2010-11-16 22:29:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Created attachment 22424 [details]
> add destructors in
> here's another patch, this one uses SFINAE to select an appropriate overload
> based on the type of __g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455
--- Comment #29 from Zouzou 2010-11-17 07:38:39
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #28)
> Created attachment 22427 [details]
> add destructors in
> almost the same as the last patch but the destructor calls:
> _S_destroy<__gthread_recursive_mutex_t>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46455
--- Comment #32 from Zouzou 2010-11-17 22:38:53
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #31)
> Created attachment 22436 [details]
> add destructors in
> a simpler version - could you test this on mingw? thanks
great, compiles and fixes the resource leaks
13 matches
Mail list logo
