https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103797
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103797
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
Aha, I did not noticed that we need special patterns (I extecpted this is
problem to solve in machine independent code). So I guess we have
1) SLP should vectorize the 3 accesses with -ffast-math to only on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88602
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
In addition to Skia, Firefox gfx library now contains more clang specific
vector code:
gfx/wr/swgl/src/vector_type.h
control vector implementation of some shader rountines (seen in the
rasterflood-gradient be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103797
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103903
Bug ID: 103903
Summary: Loops handling r,g,b values are not vectorized to use
power of 2 vectors even if they can
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103903
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 103903, which changed state.
Bug 103903 Summary: Loops handling r,g,b values are not vectorized to use power
of 2 vectors even if they can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103903
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45273
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100314
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
With -O1 i get:
IPA function summary for main/7 inlinable
global time: 72.936364
self size: 6
global size: 19
min size: 16
self stack: 0
global stack:44
size:15.000
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100314
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
However i is also dead at dse time:
void d (int m)
{
int k;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100220
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||100314
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104187
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
For Gimple representation __builtin_always_inline(foo(x, y))
does not make very good sense since gimple is not nested and foo may return
void so there may not be any link between call and the builtin.
I see t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104303
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103585
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 52317
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52317&action=edit
WIP patch
This is patch I made while working on this problem. It improves the escape
analysis of the first patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104320
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103040
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103050
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
Martin,
do we know that the retslot change is the bad commit? I proofread the patch
and did not see anything obviously wrong, however as seen in PR103040 the
previous behaviour that made return slots to escap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103052
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103073
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103083
Bug ID: 103083
Summary: Wrong code due to ipa-cp's value range propagation
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103082
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103058
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ipa |fortran
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103070
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103073
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103101
Bug ID: 103101
Summary: testsuite/gfortran.dg/vector_subscript_1.f90 fails
with -fipa-pta (apparently due to dom bug)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86389
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
Since the vector_subscript testcase seems indeed to be frontend issue triggered
by -fipa-pta (and soon by modref). I wonder if we should have fortran bug
tracking this or change component here?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103083
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Just for the record, the problem is the ancestor jump function being used to
model two things - pointer plus which originates from ADDR_EXPR of component
reference and also C++ casts which checks whether param
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103058
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
So the problem in this case really isn't fortran bug, but somewhat weird
iteraction between visibility predicates. In particular we make
binds_to_current_def to return false if symbol can be discarded and
ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103082
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 103082, which changed state.
Bug 103082 Summary: [12 Regression] gcc/poly-int.h:1162:5: runtime error: left
shift of negative value -40
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103082
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103073
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103035
Bug 103035 depends on bug 103073, which changed state.
Bug 103073 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in insert_access, at
ipa-modref-tree.h:578 since r12-4401-gfecd145359fc981b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103073
What|R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103070
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103117
Bug ID: 103117
Summary: uncprop produces harder to analyze but not better code
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102943
--- Comment #25 from Jan Hubicka ---
LNT sees new regresion on WRF build times (around 6%) at Nov 3
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=287.548.8
https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/graph?plot.0=289.270.8
The revis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103055
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98925
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Extend modref to handle |Extend ipa-prop to handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103117
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103142
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103164
Bug ID: 103164
Summary: -fipa-pta degrades aliasing oracle for tramp3d
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97403
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Martin,
I think we can close this (possibly adding the testcase)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103168
Bug ID: 103168
Summary: Value numbering of pure functions can be improved
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103168
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
Sorry the testcase should have pure in it
__attribute__((pure)) int test();
int
main()
{
int ret;
int a[10];
for (int i=0; i<10;i++)
if (test())
a[i]++;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103182
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103189
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
I wonder if you can attach .optimized dumps of valid revision and broken one.
It may be related to modref/PTA changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103195
Bug ID: 103195
Summary: tfft2 text grows by 70% with -Ofast between
g:52fa771758635d9c53cddb9116e5a66fae592230...a97fdde62
7e64202940112009d45d17f85e4cc61
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103200
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Sorry, I managed to include last minute change that was wrong. Currently
modref does not track if function is deterministic so we can not detect looping
pure/consts. I am testing.
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-modref
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103209
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103211
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
There is wrong change in my patch (I mixed up this_looping variable for
looping)
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-pure-const.c b/gcc/ipa-pure-const.c
index b831844afa6..5056850c0a8 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-pure-const.c
+++ b/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103209
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
This is bug I introduced to tree-ssa-structalias where I reversed order of
flags which deterine global memory read and writes. So pure functions are
handled as functions writting global memory but not reading
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103195
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mjambor at suse dot cz
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103182
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
What happens here is that we optimize the loop to memcpy and memcpy EAF flags
coming from fnspec are quite interesting. The copied argument is marked as
escaping but used only directly. This is correct but n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103058
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 103058, which changed state.
Bug 103058 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_static_chain_flags, at
gimple.c:1669 when building 527.cam4_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103058
What|Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102943
Bug 102943 depends on bug 103058, which changed state.
Bug 103058 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_static_chain_flags, at
gimple.c:1669 when building 527.cam4_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103058
What|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103070
Bug 103070 depends on bug 103058, which changed state.
Bug 103058 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in gimple_call_static_chain_flags, at
gimple.c:1669 when building 527.cam4_r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103058
What|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103209
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103182
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103189
Bug 103189 depends on bug 103182, which changed state.
Bug 103182 Summary: [12 Regression] Recent change causes code correctness
regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103182
What|Removed |Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103179
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103223
Bug ID: 103223
Summary: [12 regression] Access attribute prevents IPA
optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103222
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103192
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103227
Bug ID: 103227
Summary: 58% exchange2 regression with -Ofast -march=native on
zen3 between g:1ae8edf5f73ca5c3 and g:2af63f0f53a12a72
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103227
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103227
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
There is difference in inlier decision. Since all clones are of same size it
depends on the order inliner picks them and combines together before hitting
large-function-growth. It seems that with isra orderi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103227
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
The heuristics here is quite simplistic - it all happens after small function
inlining while trying to inline function called once. Each of clones is called
once and it really depends on the order we walk the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103211
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 103211, which changed state.
Bug 103211 Summary: [12 Regression] 416.gamess crashes after
r12-5177-g494bdadf28d0fb35
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103211
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103223
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 regression] Access |[12 regression] Access
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103189
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-13
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102943
--- Comment #28 from Jan Hubicka ---
Bit unrelated but shows that threader seems bit expensive on other builds too.
Getting stats from cc1plus LTO-link with -flto-partition=one it seems that
backwards threader and dom are two slowest tree passes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103234
Bug ID: 103234
Summary: ipa-sra is broken (and therefore disabled) on
variably sized parameters
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
Looking into optimized dump, I wonder why IPA-SRA is rpelacing some of
parameters passed by reference but not all of them:
-__attribute__((fn spec (". w w w w w w w w w w w w w ")))
-double dco (int & restric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103266
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103266
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103267
Bug ID: 103267
Summary: Wrong code with ipa-sra
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103267
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
jan@localhost:~> gcc t.c
t.c:2:1: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
2 | infinite (int p)
| ^~~~
t.c:16:1: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
16 | tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101941
--- Comment #21 from Jan Hubicka ---
Jakub: I see it is about error attributed call in the split out part of
function. Then we really want to prevent the split. Keeping track of those
should be possible in the recursive walk (where we keep track
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97783
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103282
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
--- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka ---
Thanks for reducing the testcase.
I found the reason for build difference. There is misplaced code clearing
to_info_lto.
hubicka@lomikamen-jh:/aux/hubicka/trunk-git/build4/gcc$ cat ~/fix
diff --git a/gcc/i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103243
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-17
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102426
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103243
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Does not reproduce for me on aarch64 (gcc114 from the compile farm)
jh@gcc114:~/trunk/build2/gcc$ ./xgcc -B ./ --version
xgcc (GCC) 12.0.0 2027 (experimental)
Copyright (C) 2021 Free Software Foundation, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
--- Comment #15 from Jan Hubicka ---
Yep, I still see difference in the output with and without SRA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
--- Comment #16 from Jan Hubicka ---
Building with LTO only ecpder.fppized.o and ecplib.fppized.o I get the failure
going away with --dbg-cnt=ipa_cp_values:10 and :9 works.
Different ipa-cp decision is
+***dbgcnt: upper limit 10 reached for ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
--- Comment #17 from Jan Hubicka ---
and fun fact is that it really depends how program is paritioned.
-flto-partition=max keeps problem reproducing while -flto-partition=one makes
it go away and -flto-partition=one --disable-tree-modref2 bring
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
--- Comment #18 from Jan Hubicka ---
This seems to fix it for this particular partitioning at least ;)
The problem was in summary update producing ill formed access range (which
doesn't know base but knows offset from it) and that confused strea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
--- Comment #19 from Jan Hubicka ---
I was too optimistic - the patch does not help.
The problem is related to modref. With lto-partition=max the problem triggers
while lto-partition=one hides it becuase late tree modref recomputes summaries
a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
--- Comment #20 from Jan Hubicka ---
linking with --dbg-cnt=ipa_cp_values:10 -flto-partition=one
--disable-tree-modref2 --dbg-cnt=ipa_mod_ref:836 -fdump-tree-all-details
-fdump-ipa-all-details is first that produces different results. Diff to 83
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103168
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
This is simple (and fairly common) case we don't optimize
struct a {
int a;
static __attribute__ ((noinline))
int ret (int v) {return v;}
__attribute__ ((noinline))
int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
--- Comment #22 from Jan Hubicka ---
Seems fixed on LNT now too https://lnt.opensuse.org/db_default/v4/SPEC/21494
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 103246, which changed state.
Bug 103246 Summary: [12 Regression] 416.gamess miscompare with -O2 -g
-flto=auto since r12-5223-gecdf414bd89e6ba251f6b3f494407139b4dbae0e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103266
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
I am testing
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-modref.c b/gcc/ipa-modref.c
index c94f0589d44..e5d2b11025a 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-modref.c
+++ b/gcc/ipa-modref.c
@@ -2033,10 +2033,7 @@ modref_eaf_analysis::merge_call_lhs_flag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103322
Bug ID: 103322
Summary: galgel from spec2000 is now broken on x86_64 with
-Ofast -march=native -flto (on core)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103282
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |hubicka at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Co
201 - 300 of 861 matches
Mail list logo