--- Comment #5 from hp at bitrange dot com 2005-11-09 01:08 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] testsuite
failure:gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 exe
On Tue, 8 Nov 2005, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #4 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #7 from hp at bitrange dot com 2005-11-09 10:24 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] testsuite
failure:gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/in-pack.f90 exe
On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #6 from fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #9 from hp at bitrange dot com 2005-11-11 01:06 ---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] global-alloc (reload)
trips over own confusion for unexpected addressing modes
On Thu, 10 Nov 2005, janis at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
> --- Comment #8 from janis at gcc dot gnu dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54006
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
On Fri, 28 Jul 2017, egallager at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Testcase compiles, runs, and exits with 0 for me on i386-apple-darwin9.8.0.
I'm not sure how that target is relevant?
(I forgot to set a targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62250
--- Comment #13 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
On Fri, 9 Jan 2015, dje at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62250
>
> David Edelsohn changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
--- Comment #6 from hp at bitrange dot com 2008-05-09 03:49 ---
Subject: Re: [4.4 Regression] g++.dg/opt/pr23714.C
ICEs with 135041 -> 135057
On Thu, 8 May 2008, zadeck at naturalbridge dot com wrote:
> I am testing this patch on x86. But hp needs to test it on the cris
>
--- Additional Comments From hp at bitrange dot com 2005-05-19 14:07
---
Subject: Re: [4.1 regression] ADDR_EXPR invariancy
not recomputed
On Thu, 19 May 2005, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote:
> --- Additional Comments From giovannibajo at libero dot it 2005-05-19
>
--- Additional Comments From hp at bitrange dot com 2004-12-20 01:00
---
Subject: Re: [4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware
gcc.c-torture/execute failures: 20010224-1.c, 20020216-1.c, 20040218-1.c,
20040709-2.c
On Sun, 20 Dec 2004, steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote
--- Additional Comments From hp at bitrange dot com 2004-11-13 01:25
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware
testsuite failure: gcc.dg/uninit-C.c
On Fri, 12 Nov 2004, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc d
--- Additional Comments From hp at bitrange dot com 2004-11-13 05:36
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 regression] mmix-knuth-mmixware
testsuite failure: gcc.dg/uninit-C.c
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc d
10 matches
Mail list logo
