https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97821
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97836
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrong code at -O1 on|[11 Regression] wrong code
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97838
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE at -O3 on |[11 Regression] ICE at -O3
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97803
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
It is fixed by r8-647.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31799
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu ---
(In r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97060
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
FWIW, I cherry-picked the fix onto vendors/redhat/gcc-10-branch branch.
I can build 5.10 kernel with the fixed GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87085
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to ncm from comment #8)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> > (In reply to chengming from comment #4)
> > > Created attachment 44602 [details]
> > > ELF file
> > >
> > > compiled with command
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97932
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at redhat dot com
Summary|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97577
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97936
Bug ID: 97936
Summary: [11 Regression] 30_threads/latch/3.cc hangs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97936
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Also:
FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_integral/wait_notify.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97936
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
Also 30_threads/semaphore/try_acquire_until.cc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97936
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(gdb) bt
#0 0x7f6b5984330d in syscall () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x00401429 in std::__detail::__platform_wait (
__addr=__addr@entry=0x7ffc848e7014, __val=__val@entry=1)
at
/export/gnu/import/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97959
Bug ID: 97959
Summary: Random FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/save-temps
c_lto_save-temps_0.o-c_lto_save-temps_0.o link, -O
-flto -save-temps
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8)
> > > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> > > > Can you please H.J. tak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97902
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98018
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Something like, -fneed-frame-pointer, -fforce-frame-pointer or
-fgenerate-frame-pointer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98018
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
-fforce-frame-pointer should disable
1. Tail call.
2. Inlining. Should inlining be totally disabled? Which inlining should be
disabled? What do do with static inline and extern inline?
3. Frame pointer optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98027
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98048
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |[11 Regression] ICE in
|buil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98051
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-11-29
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98051
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97359
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||haoxintu at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98068
Bug ID: 98068
Summary: [11 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic/pr65345-4.c -O2
-flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none
(internal compiler error) by r11-3303
Product:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97959
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93195
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110
Bug ID: 98110
Summary: [11 Regression] dl-lookup.c in glibc is miscompiled by
r11-5029
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98110
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98112
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago at kde dot org
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
The issue here is that what should happen when definitions marked with used
attribute and unmarked definitions are put in the same section. It has nothing
to do with .retain.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-03
Component|target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-cfl-2 tmp]$ cat x.c
struct dtv_slotinfo_list
{
struct dtv_slotinfo_list *next;
};
extern struct dtv_slotinfo_list *list;
static int __attribute__ ((section ("__libc_freeres_fn")))
free_slotinfo (struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to seurer from comment #2)
> #define HAVE_GAS_SECTION_LINK_ORDER 1
Please show the command line options passed to ld, pass --dependency-file=FILE
to ld to list all linker input files and upload all linke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
--- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 49675
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49675&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98128
Bug ID: 98128
Summary: [11 Regression] Bootstrap failed on 32-bit hosts
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98128
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98125
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from H.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98121
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98162
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98161
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Regression] Incorrect |[11 Regression] Incorrect
|s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98161
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98161
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98162
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81652
Bug 81652 depends on bug 98162, which changed state.
Bug 98162 Summary: Documentation mentions non-existent option -mcet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98162
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98172
Bug ID: 98172
Summary: Update -mtune=generic for the current Intel and AMD
processors
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98172
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94440
--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> I can't reproduce it anymore.
For r11-5820,
[hjl@gnu-clx-1 gcc]$ cat 1.c
int b;
double c, d;
void fn1() {
int i;
for (i = 0; i < b; i++)
c += i;
}
int __att
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98172
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> Hmm, but rep movsb is only fast starting with Zen3 IIRC.
Are MOVSL/MOVSQ faster than MOVSB on Zen1/Zen2?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98172
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
GCC 11 will be system GCC 2 years from now. The current processors in 2020
will be 2 years old.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Also affecting Linux kernel build:
In file included from ./include/trace/define_trace.h:102,
from ./include/trace/events/tlb.h:62,
from arch/x86/mm/init.c:35:
./include/trace/trac
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jozef.l at somniumtech dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 49723
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49723&action=edit
A patch
Hongtao, can you take it over?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49723|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> > Created attachment 49723 [details]
> > A patch
> >
> > Hongtao, can you take it over?
>
> I'll validate it.
Please verify tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 49725
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49725&action=edit
An alternate patch
This patch may generate better debug info.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #49724|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98227
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
Please try:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-December/561484.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98219
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98246
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98210
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
Since gold has been fixed now, you can add a check for broken gold and set
HAVE_GAS_SHF_GNU_RETAIN to 0 for broken gold.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98146
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98328
Bug ID: 98328
Summary: [11 Regression] "make install-strip" failed
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98328
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-12-16
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98348
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97032
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97184
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-09-28
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|11.0|8.4.1
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97054
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97231
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.5
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247
Bug ID: 97247
Summary: Typo in
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Typo in |Typos in
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
The updated patch w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97247
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97184
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|11.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96827
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97257
Bug ID: 97257
Summary: FAIL: gcc.target/i386/movdir64b.c (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 8.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97257
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97259
Bug ID: 97259
Summary: Incorrect ENQCMD and ENQCMDS patterns
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97259
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97280
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2020-10-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97281
Bug ID: 97281
Summary: Mark- march=x86-64-v[234] binaries
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97286
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97281
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98373
Bug ID: 98373
Summary: [11 Repression] Bogus error: ‘symbuf’ may be used
uninitialized at -O0
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98373
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
[hjl@gnu-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98373
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11 Repression] Bogus |[11 Repression] Bogus
|error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98381
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98387
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98387
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Daniel Han-Chen from comment #3)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> > _mm_cmp_ps is an AVX intrinsic.
>
> Yep noticed _mm_cmp_ps is only in AVX. The weird part is it actually causes
> no errors
101 - 200 of 1403 matches
Mail list logo
