[Bug target/99530] [i386] 'P' inline assembly operand modifier should obey -fno-plt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/99530] [i386] 'P' inline assembly operand modifier should obey -fno-plt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 50366 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50366&action=edit A patch I am testing this.

[Bug target/99530] [i386] 'P' inline assembly operand modifier should obey -fno-plt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #50366|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/99530] [i386] 'P' inline assembly operand modifier should obey -fno-plt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #8) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7) > > Created attachment 50369 [details] > > The v2 patch > > Code generation with "call %P0" is now identical to what GCC genera

[Bug target/99530] [i386] 'P' inline assembly operand modifier should obey -fno-plt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug target/99530] [i386] 'P' inline assembly operand modifier should obey -fno-plt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #10) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #9) > > Don't use %P with cmp. > > I know, but that's besides the point. I was merely trying to find something > that would have

[Bug target/99530] [i386] 'P' inline assembly operand modifier should obey -fno-plt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #50369|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug lto/99618] `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' referenced in section `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' of X defined in discarded section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99618 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|MOVED |--- Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/99618] `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' referenced in section `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' of X defined in discarded section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99618 --- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6) > For normal non-LTO debug macro we emit: > .section.debug_macro,"",@progbits > .Ldebug_macro0: > .value 0x5 # DWARF macro version number >

[Bug debug/99618] `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' referenced in section `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' of X defined in discarded section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99618 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5) > Maybe it's an assembler bug that it fails to set 'E' on the GROUP section? > SHF_EXLCUDE doesn't apply to "ld -r".

[Bug debug/99618] `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' referenced in section `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' of X defined in discarded section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99618 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|NEW --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply

[Bug debug/99618] `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' referenced in section `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' of X defined in discarded section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99618 --- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #15) > So as expected all of the linkers are happy with > > .section.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro,"e",@progbits > .Ldebug_macro0: > .long debug_macr

[Bug tree-optimization/99504] Missing memmove detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99504 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #2) > The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:adf14bdbc10d4114865a08cf20020a2616039057 > > commit r11-7701-gadf14bdbc10d4114865a08cf20020a26

[Bug target/99530] [i386] 'P' inline assembly operand modifier should obey -fno-plt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99530 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug debug/99618] `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' referenced in section `.gnu.debuglto_.debug_macro' of X defined in discarded section

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99618 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug debug/99606] [10/11 Regression] ld.bfd: DWARF error: could not find abbrev number 64 since r10-7521-g54af95767e887d63

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99606 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|NEW

[Bug target/99652] New: inline doesn't with -mno-sse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99652 Bug ID: 99652 Summary: inline doesn't with -mno-sse Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assi

[Bug target/99652] inline doesn't with -mno-sse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99652 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-03-18 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/99652] inline doesn't with -mno-sse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99652 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug target/99652] inline doesn't with -mno-sse

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99652 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Status|NEW

[Bug target/99679] [11 Regression] ICE in construct_container at gcc/config/i386/i386.c:2571 since g:5e2eabe1eed1e53d39923517122d3c7de2013ad4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99679 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/99704] New: volatile is needed on asm statements in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99704 Bug ID: 99704 Summary: volatile is needed on asm statements in Product: gcc Version: 9.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/99704] volatile is needed on asm statements in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99704 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu

[Bug target/99703] gcc-10.2.0 with Via C3 Eden: configure: error: Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99703 --- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Worx from comment #10) > When I deep dive, in the logs > > No issue at the root level : > > c3eden /opt/gcc-10.2.0 # ./configure --disable-cet > checking build system type... i686-pc-linux-gnu > ch

[Bug target/99703] gcc-10.2.0 with Via C3 Eden: configure: error: Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99703 --- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 50451 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50451&action=edit A patch Try this.

[Bug target/99704] volatile is needed on asm statements in

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99704 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/99703] gcc-10.2.0 with Via C3 Eden: configure: error: Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99703 --- Comment #20 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Worx from comment #19) > It's seems that the patch fix the issue. > > Unfortunately, I have another error, but it's maybe i do not proper > configure "-march=c3" > > > > make[3]: Leaving director

[Bug testsuite/99731] New: g++.dg/modules/alias-1_a.H: error: failed to read compiled module: No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99731 Bug ID: 99731 Summary: g++.dg/modules/alias-1_a.H: error: failed to read compiled module: No such file or directory Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/99703] gcc-10.2.0 with Via C3 Eden: configure: error: Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99703 --- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Worx from comment #21) > Sorry about the dumb question, but how to know ? Run it under gdb and disassemble. It should show which instruction caused the problem.

[Bug testsuite/99731] g++.dg/modules/alias-1_a.H: error: failed to read compiled module: No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99731 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/99703] gcc-10.2.0 with Via C3 Eden: configure: error: Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99703 --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 50464 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50464&action=edit A program Please run this and upload its output. If it fails to run, please show me the output of $ grep "^flags"

[Bug target/99703] gcc-10.2.0 with Via C3 Eden: configure: error: Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99703 --- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Worx from comment #24) > worx@c3eden ~ $ gdb ./sample.bin > GNU gdb (Gentoo 10.1 vanilla) 10.1 > Copyright (C) 2020 Free Software Foundation, Inc. > License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later

[Bug target/99703] gcc-10.2.0 with Via C3 Eden: configure: error: Intel CET must be enabled on Intel CET enabled host

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99703 --- Comment #28 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Worx from comment #27) > (gdb) disass/r (0x0804f547 - 2), +32 > Dump of assembler code from 0x804f545 to 0x804f565: >0x0804f545: 00 00 add%al,(%eax) > => 0x0804f547: 0f 44 44 24 14 cmove

[Bug target/99744] New: __attribute__ ((target("general-regs-only"))) doesn't work with GPR intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744 Bug ID: 99744 Summary: __attribute__ ((target("general-regs-only"))) doesn't work with GPR intrinsics Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug target/99744] __attribute__ ((target("general-regs-only"))) doesn't work with GPR intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/98209] [8/9/10/11 Regression] printf failed with O1 or above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98209 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|8.5 |11.0 --- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu --- Fixed f

[Bug target/99744] __attribute__ ((target("general-regs-only"))) doesn't work with GPR intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/98209] [8/9/10 Regression] printf failed with O1 or above

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98209 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu --- The fix was reverted by commit de00a7bda94910835012bc7150be53b460a5c8b6 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Thu Mar 25 06:57:37 2021 -0700 Revert "x86: Skip ISA check for always_inline in system headers" This reve

[Bug target/99744] __attribute__ ((target("general-regs-only"))) doesn't work with GPR intrinsics

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99744 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug middle-end/99857] New: [11 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/declare-variant-1.c (test for excess errors) by r11-7926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99857 Bug ID: 99857 Summary: [11 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/declare-variant-1.c (test for excess errors) by r11-7926 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug middle-end/99857] [11 Regression] FAIL: libgomp.c/declare-variant-1.c (test for excess errors) by r11-7926

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99857 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/99870] New: uiret generated for -mcmodel=kernel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99870 Bug ID: 99870 Summary: uiret generated for -mcmodel=kernel Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/99881] Regression compare -O2 -ftree-vectorize with -O2 on SKX/CLX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99881 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-04-02 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/99881] Regression compare -O2 -ftree-vectorize with -O2 on SKX/CLX

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99881 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 50501 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50501&action=edit A patch to add vec_contruct cost ix86_builtin_vectorization_cost has case vec_construct: { /

[Bug target/99941] New: m_ALDERLAKE is missing from m_CORE_AVX2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99941 Bug ID: 99941 Summary: m_ALDERLAKE is missing from m_CORE_AVX2 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug bootstrap/99996] New: [10 Regression] r10-9673 failed to build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 Bug ID: 6 Summary: [10 Regression] r10-9673 failed to build Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstr

[Bug c++/100002] New: internal compiler error: in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12 Bug ID: 12 Summary: internal compiler error: in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/47785] GCC with -flto does not pass -Wa/-Xassembler options to the assembler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785 --- Comment #19 from H.J. Lu --- I'd like to backport it to GCC 9.

[Bug c/100005] undefined reference to `_rdrand64_step'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15 --- Comment #9 from H.J. Lu --- I don't think we need to support taking address of intrinsic. By definition, there is no intrinsic address to take.

[Bug c++/100052] [11 regression] ICE in compiling g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-3_b.C after r11-8118

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100052 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- This may be related to PR 12

[Bug tree-optimization/100076] eembc/automotive/basefp01 has 30.3% regression compare -O2 -ftree-vectorize with -O2 on CLX/Znver3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100076 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- Is -O3 slower than -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize? If not, why?

[Bug target/100088] ymm store split into two xmm stores

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100088 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/100114] libasan built against latest glibc doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100114 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Confirmed by code inspection, but it's for sure sth not new (but would be > nice to fix before GCC 11.1). > > I suggtest to simply move the initialization inside Set

[Bug c++/100131] New: [meta-bug] internal compiler error: in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100131 Bug ID: 100131 Summary: [meta-bug] internal compiler error: in hashtab_chk_error, at hash-table.c:137 Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/98964] FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/constexpr-52830.C -std=c++14 (test for excess errors)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98964 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Host|hppa-unknown-linux-gnu | Component|testsuite

[Bug target/97148] Add

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97148 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/97250] Implement -march=x86-64-v2, -march=x86-64-v3, -march=x86-64-v4 for x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug target/97250] Implement -march=x86-64-v2, -march=x86-64-v3, -march=x86-64-v4 for x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250 --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > > x86-64-v2 includes CMPXCHG16B, aka CX16. But -mcx16 doesn't define __CX16__. > > It's called __GCC_HAVE_SYNC_COMPARE_AND_SWA

[Bug target/97250] Implement -march=x86-64-v2, -march=x86-64-v3, -march=x86-64-v4 for x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #7) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #5) > > > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > > > > x86-64-v2 includes CMPXCHG16

[Bug target/97250] Implement -march=x86-64-v2, -march=x86-64-v3, -march=x86-64-v4 for x86-64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97250 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug target/97140] [10/11 Regression] ICE in error: unable to generate reloads for since r10-400-gecfdb16c54ad06ac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97140 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- The real updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-September/554385.html

[Bug target/95483] [i386] Missing SIMD functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95483 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/97451] New: [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 Bug ID: 97451 Summary: [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/97451] [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- The problem is triggered by missing config/bootstrap-debug.mk. But cccS9GKD.s is is odd.

[Bug bootstrap/97451] [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug bootstrap/97451] [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/97451] [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu --- (In rep

[Bug other/97473] Spilled function parameters not aligned properly on multiple non-x86 targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97473 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Nate Eldredge from comment #0) > > On x86_64-linux-gnu, gcc generates instructions to align the stack and place > the spilled copy of x at an aligned address, and the testcase passes there. > (Perhaps

[Bug rtl-optimization/97482] Optimized (-O3) XMM register load incorrectly uses movdqu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97482 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/96827] [10/11 Regression] __m128i from _mm_set_epi32 is backwards with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96827 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vkkerrata at gmail dot com --- Comment #16 fro

[Bug c/97480] ice in vect_get_and_check_slp_defs, at tree-vect-slp.c:538

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97480 --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- It is caused by r11-3998: commit 540d5f4f0215e1cdd2d4a2c89c65e46033298be0 Author: Richard Biener Date: Wed Oct 14 15:37:51 2020 +0200 Refactor vect_get_and_check_slp_defs some more This refactors vect

[Bug lto/97508] New: lto1: internal compiler error: decompressed stream: Destination buffer is too small

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97508 Bug ID: 97508 Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: decompressed stream: Destination buffer is too small Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug ada/97541] New: Ada failed to bootstrap: Error: file table slot 1 is already occupied by a different file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541 Bug ID: 97541 Summary: Ada failed to bootstrap: Error: file table slot 1 is already occupied by a different file Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ada/97541] Ada failed to bootstrap: Error: file table slot 1 is already occupied by a different file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/97541] Ada failed to bootstrap: Error: file table slot 1 is already occupied by a different file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > So isn't that yet another thing that needs to be changed/fixed in gas? > Plus on the gcc side add a test for that once it is fixed in binutils? I think this is a GCC b

[Bug ada/97541] Ada failed to bootstrap: Error: file table slot 1 is already occupied by a different file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97541 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Host||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug bootstrap/97451] [11 Regression] r11-3959 failed --with-build-config=bootstrap-cet

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97451 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/95458] Inline strncmp is *much* slower than glibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95458 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/95151] [9/10/11 Regression] Add cmpmemM pattern for -minline-all-stringops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95151 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug lto/97586] New: "make check" failures in binutils with -flto=jobserver

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586 Bug ID: 97586 Summary: "make check" failures in binutils with -flto=jobserver Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/97567] [11 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97567 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to CVS Commits from comment #3) > The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48722d158cbf692c24025e345ec570f66aa5 > > commit r11-4393-g48722d158cbf692c24025e345

[Bug ipa/97586] [11 Regression] "make check" failures in binutils with -flto since r11-3641-gc34db4b6f8a5d803

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97586 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/95519] [coroutines] non-functions for promise_type::return_void not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95519 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED CC|

[Bug c++/95519] [coroutines] non-functions for promise_type::return_void not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95519 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|REOPENED

[Bug c++/96504] [coroutines] test failures with glibc-2.32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96504 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-10-31 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/96504] [coroutines] test failures with glibc-2.32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96504 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- With glibc 2.31, I got ==2688647== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==2688647== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==2688647== Using Valgrind-3.16.1 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for copy

[Bug c++/96504] [coroutines] Use after free in std::__n4861::coroutine_handle::done()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96504 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- __builtin_coro_resume and __builtin_coro_destroy delete the memory. Everything goes downhill after it.

[Bug c++/96504] [coroutines] Use after free in std::__n4861::coroutine_handle::done()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96504 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3

[Bug bootstrap/97662] New: [11 Regression] r11-4587 breaks non-bootstrap build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97662 Bug ID: 97662 Summary: [11 Regression] r11-4587 breaks non-bootstrap build Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component

[Bug bootstrap/97662] [11 Regression] r11-4587 breaks non-bootstrap build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97662 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/97660] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in function_summary::get(cgraph_node*) since r11-4587

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97660 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2020-11-01 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ipa/97660] [11 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault in function_summary::get(cgraph_node*) since r11-4587

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97660 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #2 from

[Bug fortran/97674] New: [11 Regression] gfortran.dg/pdt_14.f03 is compiled into an infinite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97674 Bug ID: 97674 Summary: [11 Regression] gfortran.dg/pdt_14.f03 is compiled into an infinite loop Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- FWIW, x86 source in gcc testsuite should be converted to __builtin_cpu_supports().

[Bug testsuite/97688] check_vect doesn't detect AVX2 on zen

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97688 --- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 49495 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49495&action=edit Something like this.

[Bug target/97715] [11 Regression] ICE in insn_default_length, at config/i386/i386.md:15325 since r11-4578-gd10f3e900b0377b4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97715 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|hjl at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug testsuite/97803] New: c-c++-common/asan/pointer-compare-1.c assumes variable placement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97803 Bug ID: 97803 Summary: c-c++-common/asan/pointer-compare-1.c assumes variable placement Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/97803] c-c++-common/asan/pointer-compare-1.c assumes variable placement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97803 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Does it work if you add -fno-toplevel-reorder? SHF_GNU_RETAIN should > preserve the order of vars even if 'used' then. Linker will reorder section layout when SHF_GN

[Bug testsuite/97803] c-c++-common/asan/pointer-compare-1.c assumes variable placement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97803 --- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu --- Created attachment 49552 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=49552&action=edit A patch This works with SHF_GNU_RETAIN.

[Bug lto/46769] LTO failed to build gold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46769 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >