http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55022
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Grosser 2013-02-05
16:10:21 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> I'll take a peek.
Wonderful, feel free to CC me if you have any questions!
||grosser at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Grosser ---
Fixed with:
Author: grosser
Date: Sun Jul 14 06:45:08 2013 +
graphite: Do not depend on 2D + 1 form in parallelism check
PR tree
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50561
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Grosser 2012-02-08
15:38:19 UTC ---
Created attachment 26614
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26614
A possible fix
Here a possible fix. The commit message is:
Removing old scattering dimensions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52275
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Grosser 2012-02-16
14:00:29 UTC ---
It seems there Sebastian himself sees the loop flatteing pass as currently
unstable: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335#c8
I would propose to follow his suggestion, di
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50023
Tobias Grosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
--- Comment #18 from Tobias Grosser ---
(In reply to Mircea Namolaru from comment #17)
> Yes, data dependencies computation is expensive in the polyehdral model
> and it could take considerable time - but it is worrying that in too many
> cases fa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
--- Comment #9 from Tobias Grosser ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8)
> On Wed, 29 Jan 2014, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
>
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
> >
> > --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humier
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58028
Tobias Grosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Gro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59121
Tobias Grosser changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grosser at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61792
--- Comment #11 from Tobias Grosser ---
(In reply to Manfred Schwarb from comment #10)
> Dominique, you are right.
> The issue is not with isl-0.12 and isl-0.13.
>
> It is isl-0.11 that is missing these include files. So with the
> above mention
10 matches
Mail list logo