[Bug c++/56658] New: Silent conversion between 'char' and 'int' even though there are 'signed char' and 'unsigned char' alternatives

2013-03-20 Thread greenscape777 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56658 Bug #: 56658 Summary: Silent conversion between 'char' and 'int' even though there are 'signed char' and 'unsigned char' alternatives Classification: Unclassified

[Bug c++/56658] Silent conversion between 'char' and 'int' even though there are 'signed char' and 'unsigned char' alternatives

2013-03-20 Thread greenscape777 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56658 --- Comment #3 from GS 2013-03-20 15:07:00 UTC --- What about warning? Would it be like harmful, or what?

[Bug libstdc++/51538] New: std::set::insert(InputIterator first, InputIterator last) makes set uniterable

2011-12-13 Thread greenscape777 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51538 Bug #: 51538 Summary: std::set::insert(InputIterator first, InputIterator last) makes set uniterable Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status:

[Bug c++/55737] New: Template and the constant, short-form if-then-else condition issue

2012-12-18 Thread greenscape777 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55737 Bug #: 55737 Summary: Template and the constant, short-form if-then-else condition issue Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/55737] Template and the constant, short-form if-then-else condition issue

2012-12-19 Thread greenscape777 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55737 --- Comment #2 from GS 2012-12-19 10:31:45 UTC --- Hey Andrew. You words completely logical,. But I think it can be avoided when condition can be calculated during compilation. Though it's only my opinion. Though I still have a couple

[Bug c++/55737] Template and the constant, short-form if-then-else condition issue

2012-12-19 Thread greenscape777 at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55737 --- Comment #4 from GS 2012-12-19 16:11:11 UTC --- Always nice to read friendly replies :). Sure I could. As I said, I'm not sure I was right in the first place. Just wanted to help to make gcc better than clang. Where I need no workaround