y: Incorrect warning/error when compiling with a typedef'ed
ptr return type
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu d
CONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gnu at bluedreamer dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32730
--- Comment #1 from gnu at bluedreamer dot com 2007-07-11 18:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=13887)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13887&action=view)
Source file
Example source that causes bug
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32730
--- Comment #2 from gnu at bluedreamer dot com 2007-07-11 18:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=13888)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13888&action=view)
>From --save-temps
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32730
--- Comment #3 from gnu at bluedreamer dot com 2007-07-11 18:11 ---
Created an attachment (id=13889)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13889&action=view)
>From --save-temps
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32730
time-tools=/usr/local --enable-lto
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.5.0 (GCC)
--
Summary: Including and hides ::signbit function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
--- Comment #1 from gnu at bluedreamer dot com 2010-06-21 14:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=20963)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20963&action=view)
Source file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44611
--- Comment #2 from gnu at bluedreamer dot com 2010-06-21 14:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=20964)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20964&action=view)
--save-temps output .ii file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44611
--- Comment #3 from gnu at bluedreamer dot com 2010-06-21 14:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=20965)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=20965&action=view)
--save-temps output .s file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44611
--- Comment #9 from gnu at bluedreamer dot com 2010-06-21 16:07 ---
> I agree the macro and template can't co-exist, but the template could be
> available as both std::signbit and ::signbit, and I think that's required by
> appendix D.
Are these still relevant
--- Comment #11 from gnu at bluedreamer dot com 2010-06-21 16:20 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> (In reply to comment #9)
> > Are these still relevant for c++0x? More so section 5 which says if they are
> > macros in C they must be macros in C++
>
> see 26.8
--- Comment #13 from gnu at bluedreamer dot com 2010-06-21 16:31 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Is there a reason you changed the component back to c++?
> This is not a problem in the C++ compiler front-end.
>
I didn't mean to change anything. All I did was reply (maybe
12 matches
Mail list logo
