http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55974
Bug #: 55974
Summary: [avr] Wrong suffix for built-in defines __INT24_MAX__
and __UINT24_MAX__ with -mint8
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55974
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-14
18:28:37 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 14 18:28:24 2013
New Revision: 195169
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195169
Log:
PR target/55974
* config/avr/a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55974
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-14
18:32:19 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 14 18:32:05 2013
New Revision: 195170
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195170
Log:
Backport from 2013-01-14 trunk r195
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55974
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFI
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56064
Bug #: 56064
Summary: Optimize VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR with FIXED_CST
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimiza
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41076
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|F
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-23
15:13:56 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jan 23 15:13:51 2013
New Revision: 195407
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195407
Log:
PR target/54222
* config/avr/s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-25
09:28:14 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Jan 25 09:28:09 2013
New Revision: 195464
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195464
Log:
gcc/
PR target/54222
* confi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Known to work|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55996
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||meta-bug
Depends on|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814
--- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-28
20:03:34 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Jan 28 20:03:26 2013
New Revision: 195515
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195515
Log:
PR other/54814
* reload.c (fi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54814
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54222
--- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-29
10:33:24 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jan 29 10:33:18 2013
New Revision: 195532
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195532
Log:
PR target/54222
* config/avr/
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56064
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-30
11:04:35 UTC ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jan 30 11:04:30 2013
New Revision: 195574
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=195574
Log:
gcc/
PR tree-optimization/56064
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56064
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2013-01-31
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-31
15:24:58 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> testcase (zip-archive)
Ple
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56164
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-01-31
20:25:20 UTC ---
Created attachment 29322
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29322
Small an valis test case
Output with avr-gcc 4.7.2:
avr-gcc -S -mmcu=atmega8 -Os foo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56164
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Priority|P3
|gjl at gcc dot gnu.org |
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-02-02
14:21:27 UTC ---
Closed as invalid. No answer and no valid test case for over 3 months now.
|gjl at gcc dot gnu.org |
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay 2013-02-02
14:22:46 UTC ---
Closed as invalid. No answer and no valid test case for over 3 months now.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183
Bug #: 56183
Summary: [meta-bug][avr] Problems with register allocation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: meta-bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56183
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69049
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||avr
Priority|P3
|NEW
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed||2016-01-29
Component|target |other
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0
||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69685
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69685
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
FYI, as you are using Newlib (and not avr-libc as all the folks does) you want
to configure with --with-avrlibc=no.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30417
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Cannot reproduce this on 5.x.
The avr BE tries to apply -fdata-sections to data in progmem in a similar way
like -fdata-sections acts on data in RAM. A dedicated option like
-mprogmem-sections was not possible
||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Target support macros and headers are realm of AVR-Libc, it is not a compiler
issue. Please report at AVR-Libc's bug tracker
http://savannah.nongn
|NEW
Known to work||4.6.2
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Last reconfirmed||2016-05-21
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0
|RESOLVED
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Same as PR71151, more info there.
*** This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gigo121 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
Target||avr
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed||2016-05-21
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0
Target||avr
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed||2016-05-21
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0
|RESOLVED
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Invalid bug: Read v5 Release Caveats
> On AVR, support has been added for the devices ATtiny4/5/9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71103
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
This change is at least incomplete: it does not handle CONST. To see this
change the test case to
returnValue.response = response + 1;
Who is generating these SUBREGs? If it's in a push insn, we should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70676
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
You can follow the bug reporting instructions an provide the preprocessed code
and the compiler output as described in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need
Just add -v -save-temps to the compiler's command line
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70677
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
You can follow the bug reporting instructions an provide the preprocessed code
and the compiler output as described in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need
Just add -v -save-temps to the compiler's command line
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70677
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Maybe -fno-caller-saves is what you are looking for?
Here is a C test case guessed from your first code snipped:
typedef struct
{
unsigned char x, y;
} point;
extern void printSpeed (long, unsigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Anatol from comment #5)
> It is a severe compiler issue that stop avr-gcc 6 from using.
> Consider changing "Importance" status to blocker.
It's definite not a "blocker". "blocker" would mea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
What about avr_asm_function_rodata_section? Isn't it possible to filter DECL
and only transform for addr_vect?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Well, then we should remove TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION implementation
altogether (it's weird, not only because it patches flag_data_sections), same
for ASM_OUTPUT_ADDR_VEC_ELT.
Instead implement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
--- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
well, IIRC for Tiny .rodata is still a part of .data and not part of .text? If
this is still the case, then on Tiny the best place for jump tables is also
.text.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
--- Comment #13 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Disadvantage of havong tables in same text section a code is that code side
might increase for the following reason: branches that cross a switch
statement will also have to cross the jump table, hence b
|NEW
Last reconfirmed||2016-06-08
Component|target |c++
CC||gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Host|x86_64-apple-darwin15 |x86_64
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71053
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Michael Weiser from comment #5)
> I think it's well estabilished and verified by now that this is an
> avr-target-specific regression (which I think is what Richard meant).
Well, "avr-specifi
|7.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|gjl at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Implemented for v7.
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Mentioned macros from stdint.h are not available in older C++ standards which
leads to abort when the compiler is being built with such a compiler.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81473
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81473
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jul 18 09:36:21 2017
New Revision: 250301
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250301&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/81473
* config/avr/avr.c (avr_optimize_cas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81473
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jul 18 09:39:53 2017
New Revision: 250302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250302&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-07-18 trunk r250301.
PR target/81
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81473
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Compiling a trivial program fails:
int main()
{
return 0;
}
$ avr-gcc simple.c -mmcu=atmega8 -v
Using built-in specs.
Reading specs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
FYI, the build compiler identifies as
$ i686-w64-mingw32-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=i686-w64-mingw32-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/home/georg/bin/opt/mingw64-winpthreads-wildcard/mingw-w64-i686/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81147
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
With your options (no -fverbose-asm for brevity), avr-gcc from trunk gives me
_Z3abcv:
push r28 ; 19 pushqi1/1 [length = 1]
push r29 ; 20 pushqi1/1 [length
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Fri Jul 21 15:58:14 2017
New Revision: 250428
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250428&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
lto-plugin/
PR lto/81487
* lto-plugin.c (claim_file_handl
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41817
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41817&action=edit
foo.cpp: C++ test cas
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41821
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41821&action=edit
cswtch.c: C test case
The following code gets blown by tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81540
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|avr |avr,x86_64
--- Comment #2 from Georg-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81540
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Estimating the size for non-switch converted switches is going to be really
> hard.
The point is that with -fno-tree-switch-conversion there is no switch at a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jul 25 09:59:44 2017
New Revision: 250499
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250499&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR 81487
* hsa-brig.c (brig_init): Use xasprintf ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80929
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Fixed?
Not sure; the middle-end (rtlanal.c::insn_rtx_cost, seq_cost) are still
bypassing PARALLELs with more than 1 SET, i.e. assume cost of 1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jul 25 11:39:23 2017
New Revision: 250509
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250509&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-05-06 trunk r247719.
PR rtl-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jul 25 11:55:44 2017
New Revision: 250511
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250511&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-05-06 trunk r247719.
PR rtl-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=75964
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
--- Comment #15 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 41829
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41829&action=edit
pr49857-v2-all.diff: Proposed patch
PR 49857
* target.def (TARGET_ADDR_SPACE_FOR_ARTIFICIAL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
--- Comment #16 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Georg-Johann Lay from comment #15)
> pr49857-v2-all.diff: Proposed patch
Problems so far:
* ivopts may shred address-space which results in wrong code. This is is the
reason for why the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81533
--- Comment #2 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I think there's a separate PR with the suggestion to try constexpr
> evaluation of all constructors for optimization.
Addresses are not constexpr because the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81407
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Tue Jul 25 14:32:30 2017
New Revision: 250522
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250522&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-07-12 trunk r250151.
PR target/81
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81407
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|8.0 |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 08:58:37 2017
New Revision: 250562
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250562&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
lto-plugin/
Backport from 2017-07-21 trunk r250428.
PR lt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 13:59:54 2017
New Revision: 250573
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250573&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
lto-plugin/
Backport from 2017-07-26 gcc-7-branch r250562.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81407
--- Comment #4 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 14:08:56 2017
New Revision: 250574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250574&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-07-12 trunk r250151.
PR target/81
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81407
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.4.1, 7.1.1
--- Comment #5 from Geor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81305
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 14:22:31 2017
New Revision: 250576
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250576&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2017-07-05 trunk r249995.
PR target/81
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67353
--- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 14:58:42 2017
New Revision: 250577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250577&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2016-06-15 trunk r237486.
Backport fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79883
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Wed Jul 26 14:58:42 2017
New Revision: 250577
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250577&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from 2016-06-15 trunk r237486.
Backport fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67353
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.5
Component: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
int f1 (int x)
{
switch (x)
{
case 1: x++; // FALLTHRU
case 2: x--; /* FALLTHRU */
case 3: x++;
// FALLTHRU
case 4: return x;
default
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> If you are preprocessing without -C and without -fdirectives-only, then
> comments are gone, so you really can't use them to inhibit the warning.
Yes, so -Wim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81582
--- Comment #9 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
With -fdirectives-only locations go bananas:
#include
int f1 (int x)
{
switch (x)
{
case 1: x++; // FALLTHRU
case 2: x--; /* FALLTHRU */
case 3: x++; // line #9
case 4: return x;
: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
C test case:
void func1 (unsigned char x, char *str)
{
do {
*str++ = '0' + (x & 1);
x = x / 2;
} while (x);
*str = 0;
}
$ avr-gcc-8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54450
--- Comment #7 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> > Probably dup of http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41045
>
> Agreed, closing as a duplicate of it
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80929
--- Comment #6 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 41861
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41861&action=edit
time-i.c: C test case
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Fixed?
No. The attached test case
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81611
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80929
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
mal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: gjl at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 41867
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41867&action=edit
snake-i.c: C test case.
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81625
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Created attachment 41868
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=41868&action=edit
Assembly as generated by 3.4.6 for reference.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43745
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81268
--- Comment #3 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Aug 14 09:14:16 2017
New Revision: 251085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/81754
PR target/81268
* config/avr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81754
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81754
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Mon Aug 14 09:14:16 2017
New Revision: 251085
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251085&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/81754
PR target/81268
* config/avr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81487
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
901 - 1000 of 2198 matches
Mail list logo
