[Bug other/42333] complex division failure on darwin10 with -lm

2011-02-06 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42333 --- Comment #54 from Kaveh Ghazi 2011-02-06 16:43:38 UTC --- (In reply to comment #53) > I think we should fix this by patching in a new linkage name for the routine > in > question with darwin_patch_builtins and creating a forwarding stub from

[Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] sinh vs asinh vs constexpr

2011-07-27 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813 --- Comment #48 from Kaveh Ghazi 2011-07-27 22:32:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #41) > The testcase in Comment #30 has the types wrong, the below is a corrected > version (the substance of the issue doesn't change at all). I'm also thinking > o

[Bug c++/49813] [C++0x] sinh vs asinh vs constexpr

2011-07-27 Thread ghazi at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49813 --- Comment #50 from Kaveh Ghazi 2011-07-27 23:13:18 UTC --- (In reply to comment #46) > Another note, about std::nextafter, std::nexttoward, & co: I see mpfr provides > an mpfr_nexttoward, which likely could be exploited in builtins.c pretty > e