--- Comment #2 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:02 ---
Fixed in 3.4.6
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #8 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:45 ---
The fix for this problem is very "simple"; however, it drew a discussion
that showed disagreement about the form of the type displayed in diagnostic.
Consequently, it won't be fixed for 3.4.6.
--
gdr
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:47 ---
Unlikely to be fixed for 3.4.6
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:47 ---
unlikely to be fixed for 3.4.6
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:47 ---
unlikely to be fixed for 3.4.6
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #2 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:48 ---
Fixed in 4.0.0 and up.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:49 ---
Fixed in 4.0.0 and up.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:50 ---
Fixed in 4.0.0 and up
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #5 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:50 ---
Fixed in 4.0.0 and up.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:51 ---
Fixed in 4.0.0 and up
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #4 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:57 ---
Fixed in 4.0.0.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:57 ---
Non critical.
Fixed in 4.0.0 and up
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:58 ---
Fixed in 4.0.2 and up.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 04:59 ---
Fixed in 4.0.0. and up
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:01 ---
Not release critical. Won't fix for 3.4.6.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:01 ---
Fixed in 4.0.0 and up.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #2 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:02 ---
Fixed in 4.0.0 and up.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:03 ---
Fixed in 4.0.3 and up.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:04 ---
Fixed in 4.0.2 and up.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:04 ---
Fixed in 4.0.3 and up
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #3 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:07 ---
Fixed in 4.0.0 and up
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:08 ---
Fixed in 4.0.3 and up.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:08 ---
Fixed in 4.0.3 and up.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:09 ---
Fixed in 4.0.3 and up.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #6 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:10 ---
Fixed in 4.0.0 and up.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #9 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:12 ---
Won't fix for 3.4.6
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Comment #2 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:13 ---
Not release cirtical for 3.4.6
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Comment #7 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 05:14 ---
Not a regression.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #17 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 10:11 ---
Subject: Bug 24202
Author: gdr
Date: Wed Mar 1 10:11:05 2006
New Revision: 111599
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=111599
Log:
Backport Jim Wilson's patch for PR 24202
Modified:
--- Comment #18 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 10:11 ---
patch backported to 3.4.6.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-01 10:13 ---
unlikey to be fixed for 3.4.6.
--
gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-28 08:23
---
(In reply to comment #6)
> Um... first of all, this works on 3.4 branch only by accident, i.e. I think
> the
> underlying problem is still present there. What happens is that a call has an
&
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-28 08:34
---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Patch here: <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg01713.html>.
Roger --
Are you still confident in this patch (as you said last Jan) for 3.3.6?
-- Gaby
-
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-28 08:36
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> I don't know if there is anything we can do about 3.3.x but who knows.
No PowerPC maintainer seems to be interested in this. Will most likely
close as wontfix.
-- Gaby
--
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-28 08:38
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> Confirmed, only a regression for 3.3.x.
This is infinite loop in the g++ parser. Since, it is ICE on
invalid code, it is not critical at this time.
-- Gaby
--
W
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:03
---
No maintainer is interested in fixing this.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:08
---
will not fix in 3.3.x
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.3.6
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:09
---
-
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:10
---
Not critical.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:12
---
work for 3.4.x, won't fix in 3.3.x
--
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:13
---
As per target maintainer comments.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:15
---
Won't fix for 3.3.6. Suggest upgrade to 3.4.x
--
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:16
---
Not critical for 3.3.6
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.3.6
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:18
---
Not critical for 3.3.6
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:19
---
won't fix for 3.3.6. Fixed in 3.4.x
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:23
---
fixed on 3.4.x
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:25
---
not critical for 3.3.6
--
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WORKSFORME
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:26
---
fixed for 3.4.x
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
Bug 18327 depends on bug 18384, which changed state.
Bug 18384 Summary: [3.3 Regression] ICE on zero-length array with empty
initializer...
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18384
What|Old Value |New Value
-
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:30
---
Not critical. Fixed in 3.4.x
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:34
---
Won't fix for 3.3.6
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|WA
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:37
---
As per comment #10, there is no proposed patch for 3.3.6. Closing as
won't fix..
--
What|Removed |
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:40
---
won't fix for 3.3.6. Works for 3.4.0 and higher
--
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:40
---
won't fix for 3.3.6. Works in 3.4.0 and higher.
--
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:44
---
Chnages to fix this bug would happen in the middle=end which is risky at
this point. Therefore it won't be fixed for 3.3.6. It fixed in 3.4.0 though.
--
What|Re
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:46
---
removing target milestone
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.3.6
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:47
---
won't fix for 3.3.6. Works in 3.4.0 and higher
--
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:48
---
Access control has been reworked on 3.4.x and is known to be bogus in several
respect in 3.3.x and previous. Won't fix in 3.3.6. Suggest upgrade to 3.4.x
or higher.
--
What|Re
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:51
---
won't fix for 3.3.6. The root of the bug has been cured in 3.4.x with
the new parser.
--
What|Removed |
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:51
---
Not critical for 3.3.6. Fixed in 3.4.0 and higher.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:53
---
won't fix for 3.3.5. Fixed in 3.4.x
--
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:54
---
As per comment #6
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:55
---
Not ciritcal for 3.3.6. Fixed in 3.4.1
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 13:57
---
won't fix in 3.3.6. Works with 3.4.0 and higher.
--
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 14:31
---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Fixed also in 3.4.3, Gaby is this okay to apply to the 3.3 branch when it
opens up again?
This patch does not seem to apply cleanly to 3.3.6 which as a different logic.
will cl
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 14:32
---
closing as fixed for 3.4.x
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.0
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 14:36
---
Patch does not apply to 3.3.6 source. closing as fixed in 3.4.x
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 14:38
---
fixed in 3.4.0. won't fix for 3.3.6
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14766
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 14:41
---
access control is known broken in 3.3.x and previous.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 14:42
---
won't fix for 3.3.6. Works in 3.4.0 and higher.
--
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 14:46
---
fixed in 3.4.4. Won't fix for 3.3.6
--
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 14:47
---
won't fix for 3.3.6. Works in 3.4.4 and higher.
--
What|Removed |Added
Statu
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 14:48
---
won't fix in 3.3.6. Known workaround.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONF
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 16:19
---
Patch applied to 3.3.6.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 16:31
---
Fixed in 3.4.x. Thr formating machinery is different in 3.3.6 and
this is not critical for 3.3.6. So closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 16:33
---
Fixed in 3.4.3. Won't fix for 3.3.6.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 17:16
---
Applied to 3.3.6 too.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-02 14:42
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> Does the C++ standard mention multithreading and Posix threads? ;)
That is a very uninteresting question. You're quite right that the
C++ standard does not mention usability
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-03 10:01
---
Applied 3.3.x patch too.
--
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|3.4.4
ary: misleading warning about array subscription
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
ven a pedwarn
is not helpful.
-- Gaby
--
Summary: gratuitous warning about "extern const" with initializer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigne
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-21 18:55
---
People should not hastly close bug PRs without proper analysis.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-22 17:06
---
Patch applied.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-09 15:05
---
working on it.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |gdr at
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2003-12-21 18:12 ---
I don't think, anyone is going to fix this for 3.3.x
--
What|Removed |Added
S
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: native, target-independent
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19196
Some uglifications are missing from current implementations
of the standard library
How to repeat:
% cat l.C && g++ l.C
#define hook 1
#define unhook 0
#include
int main()
{
return 0;
}
/home/gdr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-g
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21 03:53
---
(In reply to comment #8)
> The patch was tested succesfully on latest 3.3 branch too. I'm waiting for
> branch unfreeze to commit it there.
Giovanni --
gcc-3.3 is unfrozen. Do you still consider
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21 04:13
---
I don't think this bug will be fixed for 3.3.x.
The testcas is known to work 3.4.x (higher I suppose).
So closing as won't fix.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From gdr at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-21 04:17
---
This bugs seems to have been introduced in 3.0.x. It is fixed in
3.4.x and higher. Fixing this requires fiddling with name lookup and
and the template handling code. I don't think that is wise at this
--- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-10-10 22:46 ---
Subject: Re: add __attribute__((reimpl)) as a replacement for the (optional) virtual
keyword for reimplementations of virtual functions
"giovannibajo at libero dot it" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writ
--- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-10-12 09:55 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 regression] local classes as template argument
"mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The bug here is that we are checking complain at all.
|
|
--- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-10-12 18:51 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 regression] local classes as template argument
"mmitchel at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
[...]
| Consider:
|
| template
| void f(T *
--- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-10-16 14:48 ---
Subject: Re: Alignment problem in std::basic_string
"giovannibajo at libero dot it" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| I see this report is marked as a v3 report. I do not understand exactly what
--- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-10-17 07:50 ---
Subject: Re: dependent expressions in attributes
On Sat, 17 Oct 2004, giovannibajo at libero dot it wrote:
| OK, I fixed part of this for 4.0. The missing part is when the expression in
| attributes is
--- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-09-30 11:12 ---
Subject: Re: __alignof__ vs. typedefs
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Actually this is the attribute aligned vs arrays.
|
| I cannot decode what the documenati
--- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-10-05 20:40 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0 Regression] werid quoting with synax error
"pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| The problem is the error message passed into c_parse_error is
|
--- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-10-31 10:44 ---
Subject: Re: New: c_parse_error i18n problems
"jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| c_parse_error combines a string passed in with another part of a
| sentence. Co
--- Additional Comments From gdr at cs dot tamu dot edu 2004-10-31 14:11 ---
Subject: Re: c_parse_error i18n problems
"joseph at codesourcery dot com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| Subject: Re: c_parse_error i18n problems
|
| On Sun, 31 Oct 2004, gdr at cs dot ta
1101 - 1200 of 1275 matches
Mail list logo
