--- Additional Comments From gccbugs at sohailsomani dot com 2004-12-22
06:14 ---
Created an attachment (id=7803)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7803&action=view)
All required files, concatenated without any header
(1.5M uncompressed)
--
http://gcc.
--- Additional Comments From gccbugs at sohailsomani dot com 2004-12-22
06:16 ---
I apologize:
- the system type: Linux sohail 2.6.9-rc2 i686
- the options when GCC was configured/built:
Configured with: /extra/tmp/portage/gcc-4.0.0/work/gcc-4.0-20041212/configure
--prefix=/usr
--- Additional Comments From gccbugs at sohailsomani dot com 2004-12-22
06:30 ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> The main thing in this case is just having the sources since it is an ICE.
Sorry about too fast for asking
> you to read the documentation.
Its no problem, I read it,
--- Additional Comments From gccbugs at sohailsomani dot com 2004-12-22
19:33 ---
(In reply to comment #10)
> There's nothing critical about this PR, please stop bumping its priority: it
> won't magically fix it, thanks.
I thought it went from critical to normal. Sou
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|critical|normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19128
--- Additional Comments From gccbugs at sohailsomani dot com 2004-12-29
05:13 ---
Seems like its choking on line 256 in jx_ch4.adb. I *think* gnat thinks that its
an elaboration procedure but I'm not sure if it is or not.
Just trying to help :)
--
What|Re
--- Additional Comments From gccbugs at sohailsomani dot com 2004-12-29
05:18 ---
(In reply to comment #12)
> Seems like its choking on line 256 in jx_ch4.adb. I *think* gnat thinks that
> its
> an elaboration procedure but I'm not sure if it is or not.
>
> Just t
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19128
--- Additional Comments From gccbugs at sohailsomani dot com 2004-12-30
02:44 ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> Is there a simplified testcase for this?
Unfortunately no, but a reply from the gcc-patches list shows that my patch does
fix *that* problem. It was just a typo really.
--- Additional Comments From gccbugs at sohailsomani dot com 2004-12-30
02:46 ---
reply from the gcc-patches list shows that my patch does fix *that* problem. It
was just a typo really. Not enough caffine I suppose.
--
What|Removed |Added
ry: -Wno-variadic-macros - new flag?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: gccbugs at sohailsomani d
--- Additional Comments From gccbugs at sohailsomani dot com 2005-01-11
16:35 ---
Should be using cvs to compile.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
12 matches
Mail list logo
