https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92148
--- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley ---
is this still true? As I've git pushed a number of dependency fixes to the
master branch (in gm2/Make-lang.in). It built with make -j 24 on amd64 debian
stretch.
--
> CC| |gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com
>
> --
> You are receiving this mail because:
> You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92336
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92336
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
I've just git pushed a number of bug fixes to gm2/Make-lang.in (on the 9.2.0
branch of gm2). I think the above problem should now be fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91209
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93575
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
;Product: gcc
>Version: 12.0
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P3
> Component: modula2
> Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
> Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102344
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
moved file in the git repro branch and pushed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102325
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Many thanks for reporting this bug/issue. I've now git pushed changes which
have renamed all the gm2.exp driver scripts as distinct names.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102339
--- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley ---
Confirmed as a bug and now fixed in the repository - many thanks for the
report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102340
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102323
--- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley ---
Confirmed, thank you for the bug report. Now fixed in the git repro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101388
--- Comment #5 from Gaius Mulley ---
Many thanks - I've applied the patch to the git repro. Fixed now I believe.
;Product: gcc
>Version: 12.0
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P3
> Component: modula2
> Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
> Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
>
;Product: gcc
>Version: 12.0
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P3
> Component: modula2
> Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
> Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102325
--- Comment #3 from Gaius Mulley ---
"rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102325
>
> Richard Biener changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101391
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
|Added
>
> CC| |gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com
thanks for the bug report - all fixed now in git,
regards,
Gaius
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101391
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Thanks for mentioning the automake version discrepancy - which is also fixed in
git using 1.15.1.
;Product: gcc
>Version: 12.0
> Status: UNCONFIRMED
> Severity: normal
> Priority: P3
> Component: modula2
> Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
> Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101387
--- Comment #1 from Gaius Mulley ---
many thanks for the bug report - now fixed in the git repro.
The bugfix emits a prototype for throw (if required) rather than use a non
portable header file.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101389
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112946
--- Comment #5 from gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com ---
many thanks for the bug report - all fixed in gcc master branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111956
--- Comment #16 from gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com ---
"rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111956
>
> --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
> (In reply to Gaius Mulley f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113511
--- Comment #2 from gaiusmod2 at gmail dot com ---
"rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" writes:
> There's also the question on compatibility to libgm2 from GCC 13.
indeed - I guess the -mabi could be retained for backward compatibi
25 matches
Mail list logo
