https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #13 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #12)
> Aren't there enough occurences of __MINGW32__ in io/unix.c?
> Why add yet another kludge? Put the #undef at line 48.
Indeed, that works equally:
Inde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
The comment in the front-end confirms the original intent, which is that FPU
shouldn't be messed with if the user didn't explicitly request it:
/* If -ffpe-trap option was provided, add a call to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64104
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Aug 7 15:02:15 2015
New Revision: 226723
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226723&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/64104
* expr.c (gfc_check_init_e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64104
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458
--- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Aug 7 16:23:53 2015
New Revision: 226725
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226725&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/66458
* runtime/main.c (init):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67118
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67059
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Aug 8 19:59:16 2015
New Revision: 226734
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226734&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/67059
* gfortranspec.c (lang_spec
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Fixed on trunk.
Thanks for the report.
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Bud Davis from comment #3)
> 32 bit, 2.6 kernel, revision 183
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50892
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25708
Bug 25708 depends on bug 40958, which changed state.
Bug 40958 Summary: module files too large
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40958
What|Removed |Added
-
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #21 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
I suggest we close this PR, as situation has significantly improved. Please
open new PR(s) for specific issues related to module size.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67063
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
||2015-08-08
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Confirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #16 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sun Aug 9 16:43:42 2015
New Revision: 226750
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226750&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/66936
* io/unix.c (__MINGW32_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140
--- Comment #13 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #6)
> The GFORTRAN_1.6 section of the symbol map where I've inserted
> the _gfortan_mvbits_i16 symbol does not exist in 5-branch. If
> the other functions in this s
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fxcoudert at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Patch proposed: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00758.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572
--- Comment #16 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Patch proposed: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-08/msg00762.html
||2015-08-14
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fxcoudert at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
,
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fxcoudert at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
On x86_64-apple-darwin14, I can confirm this occurs on 5.2.0 but appears to
have been
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57496
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|fortran |libfortran
--- Comment #7 from
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fxcoudert at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Index: trans-intrinsic.c
===
--- trans
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54656
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sun Aug 16 19:47:02 2015
New Revision: 226929
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226929&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/54656
* trans-intrinsic.c (gfc_b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54656
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #4 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to janus from comment #3)
> Leftover to-do item:
>
> > Using
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
This was fixed in 4.7 and later.
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Blocks||32834
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
F95 bug. Still present. In the generated code, the size of Y is computed before
the bounds for the F result are set, which leads to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #19 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Aug 18 19:56:20 2015
New Revision: 226988
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226988&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/66936
* io/unix.c (__MINGW32_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #20 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Aug 18 19:58:15 2015
New Revision: 226989
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226989&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/66936
* io/unix.c (__MINGW32_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936
--- Comment #21 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Now backported to all active branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36757
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Tue Aug 18 20:07:57 2015
New Revision: 226990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/36757
* builtins.c (expand_bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36757
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62296
--- Comment #8 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sun Aug 23 21:24:49 2015
New Revision: 227105
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227105&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/62296
* intrinsics/execute_co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62296
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572
--- Comment #17 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sun Aug 23 21:50:30 2015
New Revision: 227106
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227106&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/54572
* Makefile.def: Make l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54572
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66175
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Aug 24 16:29:59 2015
New Revision: 227135
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227135&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/62536
PR fortran/66175
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57496
--- Comment #8 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Aug 24 16:31:47 2015
New Revision: 227136
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227136&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/57496
* io/write_float.def: Us
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Fixed on trunk.
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Fixed on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57496
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62536
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Aug 24 16:29:59 2015
New Revision: 227135
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227135&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/62536
PR fortran/66175
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43849
--- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #0)
> Currently, _gfortran_abort calls:
> close_units ();
> Additionally, one should call:
> flush_all_units ();
close_units() actually flushes all units
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #14 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Seeing the PR track, it seems both Janne and Jerry are against reimplementing
Steele-White. I am too: unless we can show very good
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29600
--- Comment #10 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Wed Aug 26 12:37:42 2015
New Revision: 227210
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227210&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/29600
* Makefile.am: Add genera
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29600
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[F03] MINLOC, MAXLOC and|[F03] MINLOC and MAXLOC
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
This is a feature which:
- there is a standard way to achieve, using FLUSH in the right places
- there is a non-standard way to achieve, with environment variables
(GFORTRAN_*_UNBUFFERED)
Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58000
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #41 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #39)
> Anything can happen when you invoke undefined behavior.
Yes. Yet, as a "quality of implementation" issue, it is desirable for us
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67365
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67365
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian at airs dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53668
--- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Fri Aug 28 20:46:43 2015
New Revision: 227311
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227311&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/53668
* intrinsic.c (add_functio
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2015-08-28
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|Do some Cray-pointer fixes |Cray-pointer diagnostic
||enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #58 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Aug 31 10:37:30 2015
New Revision: 227335
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227335&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/47571
* acinclude.m4 (LIBGFOR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48664
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48664
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
The commit message went to PR47571 instead of this one:
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Aug 31 10:37:30 2015
New Revision: 227335
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227335&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54833
--- Comment #2 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Aug 31 10:54:36 2015
New Revision: 227336
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227336&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/54833
* trans.c (gfc_call_free):
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org |fxcoudert at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47571
--- Comment #59 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Mon Aug 31 14:02:43 2015
New Revision: 227347
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227347&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libfortran/47571
* acinclude.m4 (LIBGFOR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67412
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67412
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2)
> I know, but only on Solaris 12. Also, there's
> gfortran.dg/large_real_kind_2.F90 that fails at -O0 only. I still mean
> to investigat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53379
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Hadn't been picked up in year, and I am not entirely sure this is a good idea:
bounds checking is better inlined, avoiding the fun
||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
Long-standing enhancement PR, but I've never heard users ask for this feature.
No work done on it, low priority… I'm closing as WONTFIX,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67419
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67419
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2)
> The result is identical for both the mainline libgfortran.so.3 and the
> bundled gcc 4.8 libgfortran.so.3, so this might well be a libm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67419
--- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #4)
>> int main (void)
>> {
>> long double x;
>> x = 789.1356;
>> __builtin_printf ("%.30Lg\n", x);
>> __builtin_printf ("%.30Lg\n", _
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67419
--- Comment #7 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #5)
> If I drop the __builtin_ and include and instead, I
> get the expected
Then the math.h header is playing tricks and GCC is not aware.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67420
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
||fxcoudert at gcc dot
||gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2011-03-11 21:32:33 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> This seems to be because the libgfortran implementation uses gfc_charlen_type
> for the
||2011.03.12 09:58:42
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot
||gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |fxcoudert at gcc dot
|gnu.org |gnu.org
||fxcoudert at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2011-03-12 10:15:24 UTC ---
Two months
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47722
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||fxcoudert at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2011-03-12 10:18:19 UTC ---
Two months
||2011.03.12 10:20:01
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47552
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2011-03-12 10:28:04 UTC ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Mar 12 10:28:01 2011
New Revision: 170898
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170898
Log:
PR fortran/47552
* tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48054
--- Comment #1 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2011-03-12 10:33:56 UTC ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Mar 12 10:33:54 2011
New Revision: 170899
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170899
Log:
PR fortran/48054
* intrinsic.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47552
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||documentation
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Severity
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47439
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
Status|UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48086
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42566
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|fxcouder
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47883
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47552
--- Comment #8 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2011-03-15 15:36:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> - Yes, Fortran itself does not have unsigned integers, but the string length
> type is invisible to Fortran programs. The LEN intrinsic does return
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47883
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2011-03-16 17:43:47 UTC ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Wed Mar 16 17:43:41 2011
New Revision: 171056
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171056
Log:
PR libfortran/47883
* acinclu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47883
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Version|unk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47439
--- Comment #3 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2011-03-19 12:09:34 UTC ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Mar 19 12:09:27 2011
New Revision: 171178
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171178
Log:
PR libfortran/47439
* io/uni
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47439
--- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2011-03-19 14:35:12 UTC ---
Author: fxcoudert
Date: Sat Mar 19 14:35:05 2011
New Revision: 171180
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171180
Log:
PR libfortran/47439
* gfortra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47439
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2011.04.19 13:40:08
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2011-04-19 13:40:08 UTC ---
(In
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46686
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot
||2010.09.26 13:19:37
date||
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot
||gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |fxcoudert at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42954
--- Comment #7 from Francois-Xavier Coudert
2010-09-26 13:44:10 UTC ---
After some auditing: TARGET_OBJFMT_CPP_BUILTINS is safe (it's only called in
config/elfos.h and config/alpha/elf.h, and contains a single, unconditionnal
call to builtin_defi
601 - 700 of 964 matches
Mail list logo
