[Bug c++/82209] Compile error "X causes a section type conflict with Y" should provide more information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82209 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug c/53769] [C11]: Macros __STDC_NO_THREADS__ / __STDC_NO_ATOMIC__ missing.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53769 --- Comment #21 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #20) > It is not that easy. __STDC_NO_THREADS__ is a predefined macro, so it would > mean (at least on targets without stdc-predef.h, with that header one would > ho

[Bug c/53769] [C11]: Macros __STDC_NO_THREADS__ / __STDC_NO_ATOMIC__ missing.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53769 --- Comment #18 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Vincent Lefèvre from comment #17) > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #16) > > As explained above, this is not something that can be fixed in GCC. > > I'm wondering why this bug was ma

[Bug c/95445] diagnose incompatible calls to functions declared without prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95445 --- Comment #4 from Florian Weimer --- Patch posted: [PATCH] c: Implement -Wdeprecated-non-prototype This is what the new warning produces for the input from th

[Bug middle-end/87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403 Bug 87403 depends on bug 95445, which changed state. Bug 95445 Summary: diagnose incompatible calls to functions declared without prototype [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95445 What|Remov

[Bug c/95445] diagnose incompatible calls to functions declared without prototype [-Wdeprecated-non-prototype]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95445 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/118541] Incorrect transformation to xscmpgtdp for Unordered Operations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118541 --- Comment #2 from Florian Weimer --- This is about these glibc test suite failures, right? FAIL: math/test-double-acospi FAIL: math/test-float-acospi FAIL: math/test-float32-acospi FAIL: math/test-float32x-acospi FAIL: math/test-float64-acosp

[Bug c/119950] __builtin_constant_p warning with -Wdeprecated-non-prototype inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119950 --- Comment #1 from Florian Weimer --- Patch posted: [PATCH] c: Suppress -Wdeprecated-non-prototype warnings for builtins

[Bug c/119950] __builtin_constant_p warning with -Wdeprecated-non-prototype inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119950 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug c/120055] [16 Regression] ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/119950] __builtin_constant_p warning with -Wdeprecated-non-prototype inconsistent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119950 Bug 119950 depends on bug 120055, which changed state. Bug 120055 Summary: [16 Regression] ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/120055] [16 Regression] ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055 --- Comment #3 from Florian Weimer --- Patch posted: [PATCH] c: Fix crash in c-typeck.cc convert_arguments with indirect calls

[Bug c/120055] [16 Regression] ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug c/120055] [16 Regression] ice in convert_arguments with recent compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120055 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/120060] [16 Regression] bash-5.2 ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120060 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/46942] x86_64 parameter passing unnecessary sign/zero extends

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46942 --- Comment #13 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12) > (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #11) > > The ABI document was updated: > > > > Clarify the unspecified nature of excess bits in INTEGER type argument

[Bug target/46942] x86_64 parameter passing unnecessary sign/zero extends

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46942 Florian Weimer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||fw at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11 f

[Bug target/46942] x86_64 parameter passing unnecessary sign/zero extends

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46942 --- Comment #15 from Florian Weimer --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14) > > I think this means that the implementation of f must extend (if needed) > > because g did not sign-extend or zero-extend. > > If I read your psABI change r

<    1   2   3