[Bug c/106842] New: misleading warning : iteration X invokes undefined behavior

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106842 Bug ID: 106842 Summary: misleading warning : iteration X invokes undefined behavior Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/107539] New: internal compiler error: same canonical type node for different types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107539 Bug ID: 107539 Summary: internal compiler error: same canonical type node for different types Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/107539] internal compiler error: same canonical type node for different types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107539 --- Comment #1 from Franck Behaghel --- Created attachment 53836 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53836&action=edit main.cpp reduced testcase : g++ main.cpp main.cpp: In lambda function: main.cpp:222:61: internal compiler

[Bug tree-optimization/107541] [13 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107541 Franck Behaghel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||franckbehaghel_gcc@protonma

[Bug tree-optimization/107541] [13 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107541 --- Comment #3 from Franck Behaghel --- Not sure that would help but disabling those pair of passes : -fdisable-tree-ccp3 -fdisable-tree-ccp4 or -fdisable-tree-ccp4 -fdisable-tree-dom2 or -fdisable-tree-dom2 -fdisable-tree-dom3 removes t

[Bug c/105771] New: matrix partial transposition with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105771 Bug ID: 105771 Summary: matrix partial transposition with -O3 Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/105771] matrix partial transposition with -O3 since r8-5159-g1cc521f1a824b591

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105771 --- Comment #6 from Franck Behaghel --- Hello, > Does adding -fno-strict-aliasing fix the issue? Right, it does. > I think you have an aliasing violation here. I can not say if we have aliasing violation here. My understanding is that AV hap

[Bug c++/114292] New: ICE with a lambda capturing a constant for VLA allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114292 Bug ID: 114292 Summary: ICE with a lambda capturing a constant for VLA allocation Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug middle-end/114647] New: missing DCE when looping over a VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114647 Bug ID: 114647 Summary: missing DCE when looping over a VLA Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug c++/115052] New: rejected lambda while capturing a constexpr array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115052 Bug ID: 115052 Summary: rejected lambda while capturing a constexpr array Product: gcc Version: 14.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug ada/110314] New: Gnat failed assertion and Allocators with discriminant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110314 Bug ID: 110314 Summary: Gnat failed assertion and Allocators with discriminant Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug ada/110314] Gnat failed assertion and Allocators with discriminant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110314 --- Comment #2 from Franck Behaghel --- >This is new in 14, was OK when forking 13. >https://ada.godbolt.org/z/TvbPxYfnP >Currently bisecting. Marc, Released version may have checks disabled : If the file gcc/DEV-PHASE contains experimental,

[Bug ada/110314] Gnat failed assertion and Allocators with discriminant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110314 --- Comment #4 from Franck Behaghel --- Created attachment 55399 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55399&action=edit patch

[Bug ada/110314] Gnat failed assertion and Allocators with discriminant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110314 --- Comment #5 from Franck Behaghel --- Marc, Could you consider and review this patch ? Regards,

[Bug middle-end/110510] New: ggc infinite recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110510 Bug ID: 110510 Summary: ggc infinite recursion Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end Assi

[Bug middle-end/110510] ggc infinite recursion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110510 --- Comment #4 from Franck Behaghel --- Andrew,thanks. Impressive ! Tested. Indeed, this patch fixes the issue.

[Bug c++/114292] [12/13/14/15 Regression] ICE with a generic (templated) lambda capturing a constant for VLA allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114292 --- Comment #8 from Franck Behaghel --- > Patch submitted in > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-December/671590.html Thanks for the fix. Look fine indeed. No more ICE. Could someone merge this into trunk ?