--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 00:31
---
Fixed in GNU Classpath. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--
Bug 20597 depends on bug 17463, which changed state.
Bug 17463 Summary: new methods introduced in JDK 1.4 missing in java.awt.Window
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17463
What|Old Value |New Value
-
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 00:58
---
I tried to run this under JamVM+Classpath:
$ jamvm -Dpython.home="/home/fitzsim/jython-2.1" -classpath
"/home/fitzsim/jython-2.1/jython.jar" "org.python.util.jython"
Jython 2.1 o
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|graydon at redhat dot com |langel at redhat dot com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 05:08
---
Fixed in GNU Classpath by Sven de Marothy. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 05:32
---
Fixed by:
2005-08-21 Thomas Fitzsimmons <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gnu/java/awt/peer/gtk/GdkGraphics.java (setClip(Shape)): Clear
clip when clip == null.
* gnu/java/awt/pe
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 05:35
---
Do you have an example program for this? I suspect this was fixed by Sven's
image work.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16824
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 05:38
---
This prints:
Got the image: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
paint 1
1 repaints, probably ok.
Fixed by Sven's image work. Closing.
--
What|Removed |
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 05:39
---
Fixed, closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 15:12
---
I can't reproduce this on Classpath CVS HEAD. Resolving as fixed.
--
What|Removed |
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 15:36
---
I've fixed the locking problems, and changed how resizing works so that it
doesn't happen in the GTK thread. Although I don't have an Alpha to test on, my
guess is that this won't happen
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 15:47
---
JTable is implemented now. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 16:08
---
This bug boils down to: "we don't have a complete implementation of
javax.swing.text.html yet." I'm going to create a new bug for that and close
this one as a duplicate.
*** This bug
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|graydon at redhat dot com |abalkiss at redhat dot com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|graydon at redhat dot com |abalkiss at redhat dot com
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 16:19
---
This is partially fixed. However, clicking again anywhere on the JMenuBar
itself should also close the menu. Currently clicking on the empty part of the
JMenuBar doesn't close the menu.
--
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 17:04
---
I tested this with twm and committed a fix. Now, other than heavyweight popup
menus having a frame, which is a little strange, but WM-dependent, everything
seems fine. Closing.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 17:42
---
This has been fixed. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 18:30
---
Patch committed, thanks.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 20:27
---
Fixed. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-21 20:28
---
Done. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fitzsim at redhat dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-24 19:16
---
Yes; also these should be strncmp calls, since these options can be followed by
: etc..
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16729
--
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17782
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-24 19:23
---
This is fixed now. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-24 19:28
---
Lillian, can you have a look at this one? I assume this is fixed already.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-24 19:29
---
Fixed. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-24 19:29
---
Fixed. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-24 19:29
---
Fixed. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-24 19:30
---
Fixed. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20014
--
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20630
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-24 19:34
---
This test case segfaults now. Making high-priority.
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20014
--
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16005
--
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16628
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
Priority|P2 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20720
--
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
Priority|P2 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20782
--
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21741
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-24 19:43
---
*** Bug 22724 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-24 21:58
---
OK, $JAVA_HOME/jre/lib/i386 needs to go in gnu.classpath.boot.library.path and
java.library.path.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21741
--
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23549
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-24 23:49
---
We need to reimplement QuadCurve2D.solveQuadratic, possibly using the algorithm
described here: http://www.library.cornell.edu/nr/bookcpdf/c5-6.pdf
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-26 04:03
---
The segfault is fixed:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23571
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-26 04:36
---
Fixed. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-08-30 16:22
---
Fixed on CVS HEAD. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
ignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fitzsim at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26624
rce file change
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fitzsim at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26625
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fitzsim at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
sometimes
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: fitzsim at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27031
--- Comment #1 from fitzsim at redhat dot com 2006-04-04 18:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=11206)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11206&action=view)
Screenshot of top when gij uses all memory when running eclipse.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
--- Comment #1 from fitzsim at redhat dot com 2006-04-05 23:09 ---
There is another problem with how the AWT peer code is installed that we've run
into in Fedora Core. We sometimes want to ship multiple versions of GCJ. The
unversioned lib-java-awt-peer-gtk.so is installed in /us
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|graydon at redhat dot com |rodimina at redhat dot com
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzil
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-04-22 14:51
---
Done. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |200
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |fitzsim at redhat dot com
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-05-04 02:32
---
Fixed on mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-05-16 22:45
---
Renamed libgcjawt.so on mainline. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-05-
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-05-25 01:59
---
Fixed by Sven de Marothy in GNU Classpath.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-05-
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-05-25 02:01
---
Are you using focus-follows-mouse? If so, this is a known problem; a change in
a window's active state causes an expose event on the entire window, which
triggers a repaint. We need to find a way to pr
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-05-25 02:03
---
Do you still see this on HEAD? I can't reproduce it. What applet are you
running?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21649
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2005-05-
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-05-25 18:34
---
Hans, are you still planning on creating a patch for this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20699
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |Hans dot Boehm at hp dot com
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-05-30 15:32
---
There were some changes in how AWT threading works (as well as many other
changes) recently. Can you retry your test and post the results here?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17254
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-06-03 15:13
---
OK, for stuff like this we'll wait until tromey's big merge is complete. I
don't want to merge any Classpath gui work into libgcj at this point.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19860
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-06-09 22:55
---
Fixed on GNU Classpath mainline.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-01-04 20:20
---
Fixed on java-gui-branch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-02-08 16:30
---
Fixed on java-gui-branch.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2005-02-10 23:06
---
Fixed on java-gui-20050128-branch. Closing.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2004-07-27 01:15 ---
Created an attachment (id=6837)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=6837&action=view)
test case
reattach test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16771
Priority: P2
Component: AWT
AssignedTo: fitzsim at redhat dot com
ReportedBy: fitzsim at redhat dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu
dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17782
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2004-10-01 20:25 ---
Created an attachment (id=7258)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7258&action=view)
Show that keyboard focus managers are not partitioned by ThreadGroup
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed||1
Last reconfirmed|-00-00 00:00:00 |2004-10-
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||fitzsim at redhat dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18288
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2004-11-05 20:05 ---
This looks good. Please commit.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From fitzsim at redhat dot com 2004-11-05 22:13 ---
We're receiving these expose events as a result of the GtkButton changing from
the NORMAL to the PRELIGHT state. I think we should accept this behaviour as a
difference in the native widget's impl
101 - 180 of 180 matches
Mail list logo
