[Bug libstdc++/69191] New: Wrong equality comparison between error_code and error_condition + segfault

2016-01-07 Thread eyenseo at gmail dot com
: critical Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: eyenseo at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 37264 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37264&action=edit Precompiled

[Bug libstdc++/69191] Wrong equality comparison between error_code and error_condition + segfault

2016-01-08 Thread eyenseo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69191 eyenseo at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37264|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug libstdc++/69191] Wrong equality comparison between error_code and error_condition + segfault

2016-01-08 Thread eyenseo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69191 --- Comment #3 from eyenseo at gmail dot com --- This bug does not appear in 5.3.0 - using Arch Linux. I would like to know what a critical or major bug would be if a segfault is not? I think that a segfault is quite devastating, especially when

[Bug libstdc++/69191] Wrong equality comparison between error_code and error_condition + segfault

2016-01-08 Thread eyenseo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69191 --- Comment #4 from eyenseo at gmail dot com --- The ubuntu system I used is "normal" no testing / unstable.

[Bug libstdc++/69191] Wrong equality comparison between error_code and error_condition + segfault

2016-01-08 Thread eyenseo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69191 --- Comment #5 from eyenseo at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2) > I can't reproduce this, it might be specific to Ubuntu, maybe caused by > mixing gcc 4.9 with the lisbtdc++ from gcc 5 (which would mean

[Bug libstdc++/69191] Wrong equality comparison between error_code and error_condition + segfault

2016-01-08 Thread eyenseo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69191 --- Comment #7 from eyenseo at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) Thanks for letting me know of the "importance-ignoring" one two less clicks next time ;) I didn't include the segfault in the precom

[Bug libstdc++/69191] Wrong equality comparison between error_code and error_condition + segfault

2016-01-08 Thread eyenseo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69191 --- Comment #9 from eyenseo at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > That only shows how your gcc compiler was built. If I understand correctly > the Ubuntu packages that provide libstdc++.so.6 come from a dif

[Bug libstdc++/69191] Wrong equality comparison between error_code and error_condition + segfault

2016-01-09 Thread eyenseo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69191 --- Comment #11 from eyenseo at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10) > Use ldd to see which library is used at runtime. See what file that symlink > points to. Compare with the version numbers of the releases. &g

[Bug libstdc++/69191] Wrong equality comparison between error_code and error_condition + segfault

2016-01-10 Thread eyenseo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69191 --- Comment #12 from eyenseo at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #10) > Use ldd to see which library is used at runtime. See what file that symlink > points to. Compare with the version numbers of the releases. &g