--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-11-13 21:36
---
Lowering severity. This is a target bug.
See WinAVR bug #2229892 on SourceForge:
<http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=2229892&group_id=68108&atid=520074>
Which is probab
weddington at atmel dot com
GCC target triplet: avr-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38109
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-11-14 00:38
---
Created an attachment (id=16667)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16667&action=view)
Generated assembler listing showing good code at -O1.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_
--- Comment #2 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-11-14 00:41
---
Created an attachment (id=16668)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16668&action=view)
Generated assembler listing showing bad code at -O2.
The problem in 20081112-1-bad.s is in the f
--- Comment #3 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-11-15 19:30
---
Seems to be fixed now on HEAD. Closing bug.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
GCC target triplet: avr-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugz
--- Comment #2 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-11-17 00:15
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> What's sizeof (void *) and sizeof (long) for avr?
>
char: 8-bit
int/short: 16-bit
pointer: 16-bit
long: 32-bit
long long: 64-bit
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/s
ry: [avr] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr37868.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eric dot weddington at atmel do
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-11-20 16:14
---
Test was added by:
2008-11-20 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR tree-optimization/37868
* gcc.dg/torture/pr37868.c: New testcase.
* gcc.c-torture/execute/pr380
--- Comment #2 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-12-28 16:32
---
Test case fails, also as of 2008-12-23, with this:
Executing on host: /usr/local/avrdev/gcc/build/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/avrdev/gcc/build/gcc/
/usr/local/avrdev/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr36998.c -Os
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2009-01-24 16:15
---
This looks like a duplicate of bug #34299.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
--- Comment #3 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2009-01-24 23:35
---
Resolving as duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34299 ***
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2009-01-24 23:35
---
*** Bug 38954 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2009-01-27 12:52
---
Closing bug. No feedback from the OP for almost a year.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2009-08-07 16:38
---
The test case works for me on AVR GCC 4.3.2 using -Wall and -O[0123s]. Closing
bug.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #4 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2009-08-07 18:56
---
No news on this for several years. Closing as WONTFIX.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2009-08-07 19:16
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34734 ***
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2009-08-07 19:16
---
*** Bug 40112 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2009-03-18 17:47:31 |2009-08-10
--- Comment #9 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2009-08-11 13:29
---
Closing old bug as WONTFIX. Open up a new bug if it is still a problem.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
uct: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
GCC target triplet: avr-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.
--- Comment #2 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-08 14:38
---
The regression tester found that this regression was on revision 138238, by Jan
Hubicka.:
<http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2008-07/msg00034.html>
Jan, can you take a look at this please?
--
er
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: avr
--- Comment #6 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-09 17:15
---
Your fix causes a regression on the AVR:
FAIL: gcc.dg/pr36901-4.c #include_next (test for errors, line )
Success with trunk revision 138883
Failed with trunk revision 138904
--
eric dot weddington at
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-09 17:16
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36901 ***
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-09 17:16
---
*** Bug 37069 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36901
--- Comment #9 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-09 19:34
---
You're right in that limits.h for the AVR does not use #include_next. The
limits.h that the AVR toolchain uses is installed by gcc.
Unfortunately your suggestion makes the situation worse. There are
--- Comment #11 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-10 03:13
---
(In reply to comment #10)
> Since we include limits.h, we are at the mercy of the contents of the limits.h
> that is found. This isn't very reliable. We just need to a pedantic warning in
> th
--- Comment #13 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-10 16:50
---
Manuel,
Note that I have *not committed* your patch to fix this. I don't have
assignment papers done yet, nor do I have commit privs. You'll need to commit
this to fix the problem.
--
http://g
--- Comment #18 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-11 15:02
---
For some reason the new test case gcc.dg/pr36998.c is not excluding the AVR,
and of course the test is failing on the AVR.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed
--- Comment #20 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-11 16:00
---
(In reply to comment #19)
> For what reason should it be excluding AVR? There is nothing target specific
> in it.
>
I'm sorry, I got confused with line 4:
/* { dg-options "-Os -mpreferr
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
GCC target triplet: avr-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37081
[23s]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eric dot weddington at
]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eric dot weddington at atmel dot
-O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eric dot weddington at
dTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: avr-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37165
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-19 16:16
---
Created an attachment (id=16100)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16100&action=view)
Output file of the test case.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37165
--- Comment #2 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-21 00:26
---
This test also fails recently for avr-unknown-elf.
Also fails: weak-2.c, weak-3.c, weak-4.c, weak-5.c, weak-12.c.
May be related: also fails on gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c.
These tests are known fail revision
--- Comment #7 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-21 17:07
---
Patch did not fix any those regressions for the AVR:
FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^ \t]*[ \t]_?j
FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-12.c scan
--- Comment #8 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-21 17:13
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Patch did not fix any those regressions for the AVR:
>
Stupid me: There were problems when it tried to patch that I didn't notice.
Fixing that and retesting...
--- Comment #9 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-21 19:04
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Patch did not fix any those regressions for the AVR:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/weak/weak-1.c scan-assembler weak[^
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.3.1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35519
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.4.0 |4.3.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34932
--- Comment #14 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-22 03:37
---
I tried testing with 139423, but I'm getting a separate error during build:
../../../../gcc/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c: In function '__mulsc3':
../../../../gcc/libgcc/../gcc/libgcc2.c:1831: in
--- Comment #19 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-22 13:44
---
(In reply to comment #17)
> Could one (or both) please attach preprocessed code and command line so I can
> reproduce the ICE you see with the *whole* patch applied? I don't see it for
> ne
--- Comment #21 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-22 14:51
---
Created an attachment (id=16128)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16128&action=view)
Preprocessed source of ICE from building with patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_
--- Comment #22 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-22 14:52
---
ICE from building gcc target=avr with patch:
Reading specs from /usr/local/avrdev/gcc/build/./gcc/specs
Target: avr
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/usr/local/avr-test --target=avr
--datadir=/usr
--- Comment #28 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-22 18:06
---
Well, a bit of good news: patch #3 fixes all test case regressions regarding
"weak" for the AVR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170
--- Comment #10 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-22 23:06
---
Fixed on 4.4.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-24 18:21
---
Patch in bug #37185, comment #3, does not fix this bug. Bug #37185 has to do
with transpose-3.c and is an ICE. This bug has to with a failure of matrix-1.c
and is not an ICE.
--
eric dot weddington at
--- Comment #4 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-24 18:31
---
(In reply to comment #3)
> Patch in bug #37185, comment #3, does not fix this bug.
Meh. Bad patching job by me. Retesting patch...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37165
--- Comment #5 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-25 00:09
---
(In reply to comment #4)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> > Patch in bug #37185, comment #3, does not fix this bug.
>
> Meh. Bad patching job by me. Retesting patch...
>
Confirmed: patch in b
Summary: [4.4 Regression] Multiple test regressions:
gcc.dg/ipa/ipa*
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37226
--- Comment #3 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-25 05:22
---
These tests have also failed on AVR recently. Known fail on revision 139139.
And no, this is not a duplicate of 37170, as the patch for that bug fixes those
test cases, but does not fix these.
--
eric
--- Comment #8 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-25 12:26
---
> Eric,
> what platfrom are you running on ?
It's right there in the "Host" field: i686-pc-linux-gnu
Target is avr.
But I commonly build a toolchain distribution on mingw. Right now I&#
--- Comment #41 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-25 15:12
---
(In reply to comment #37)
> Created an attachment (id=16141)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16141&action=view) [edit]
> Patch, take 4.
> Please, test on darwin and avr.
--- Comment #42 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-25 16:51
---
(In reply to comment #41)
> (In reply to comment #37)
> > Created an attachment (id=16141)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16141&action=view) [edit]
> > Patch, take
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-25 17:11
---
Seems to be fixed now in latest HEAD.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-25 17:11
---
Seems to be fixed in latest HEAD.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-25 17:12
---
Seems to be fixed in latest HEAD.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #44 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-25 17:20
---
(In reply to comment #43)
> > Patch #4 still fixes all "weak" test regressions on avr.
>
> Did you test g++?
>
Yes. I build and test for c, c++, ada, and objc (yes, it actually
--- Comment #60 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-08-28 21:05
---
(In reply to comment #59)
> Patch at <http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg02037.html>.
>
Patch still works on AVR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37170
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-09-15 03:18
---
Anatoly Sokolov committed a patch as revision 140360 that may (or may not) fix
this problem. See his post on the patches list:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-09/msg01054.html
Please try a more recent
--- Comment #9 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-09-26 15:44
---
Reconfirm test still fails with revision 140691.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-10-23 00:56
---
Confirmed fixed on AVR target.
Thanks Jakub!
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37020
--- Comment #6 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-10-23 23:21
---
New test case fails for AVR target, as test case assumes that an integer is
32-bits. An integer on the AVR is 16 bits and the test case fails for -O[0123s]
with:
/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/pr37882.c
--- Comment #4 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-10-28 19:56
---
Reopening bug.
New test case gcc.dg/pr37663.c fails for AVR with:
/usr/local/avrdev/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr37663.c: In function 'foo':
/usr/local/avrdev/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
GCC target triplet: avr-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37944
--- Comment #4 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-10-30 16:03
---
See also WinAVR bug #2209796 on SourceForge:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=520074&aid=2209796&group_id=68108
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
nassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
GCC target triplet: avr-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37960
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-10-30 18:56
---
Bug caused by:
2008-10-29 Manuel Lopez-Ibanez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR 11492
* gcc.dg/pr11492.c: New.
* g++.dg/warn/pr11492.C: New.
Manuel, could you take a look a
--- Comment #3 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-10-30 19:57
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> I don't know how to compile/test AVR. Is it in the CompileFarm?
>
> To anyone with more knowledge on AVR, any suggestion what could cause this? Is
> there any spe
--- Comment #6 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-10-30 20:42
---
(In reply to comment #5)
> (In reply to comment #3)
> >
> > Note that AVR has 8-bit chars, 16-bit ints and pointers, 32-bit longs.
>
> Just a guess, given the above: for unsigned cha
--- Comment #8 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-10-31 04:26
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> Eric,
>
> Could you modify the testcase to use 100 instead of 1000 and run it under AVR?
>
The test is successful if the 1000 is changed to 100.
--
http:/
/pr37573.c execution
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
GCC target
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-11-06 18:52
---
Test case added by:
2008-11-03 Richard Guenther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PR middle-end/37573
* tree-data-ref.c (split_constant_offset_1): Fix tuplification.
* gcc.c-torture/e
reload, at
reload1.c:5178
--
Summary: [avr] ICE in reload
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eri
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-01-23 02:13
---
Created an attachment (id=14999)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14999&action=view)
Reduced test case,
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34932
--- Comment #2 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-01-23 02:19
---
Command line to test:
avr-gcc -c -mmcu=atmega32 -DF_CPU=14745600UL -O2 dimmer_profile.c -o
dimmer_profile.o
Fails with -O[23]. Successful with -O[01s].
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #7 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-02-11 22:50
---
You can also try the patch set for binutils 2.18 at the WinAVR project's CVS:
<http://winavr.cvs.sourceforge.net/winavr/>. Under the "patches" module.
--
eric dot weddington at
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25035
--- Comment #22 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-02-12 19:38
---
Created an attachment (id=15132)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15132&action=view)
Patch to disable libssp for AVR target.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25035
--- Comment #23 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-02-12 19:43
---
Since 4.x, libssp has had to be disabled for the AVR. Libssp is not required
for building the AVR. I've been meaning to reopen this bug report for a while.
Patch for disabling libssp for the AVR targ
--- Comment #1 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-02-16 18:14
---
Note that this was built with unpatched FSF sources and is configured with:
../gcc-$version/configure \
--with-pkgversion="WinAVR $release" \
--with-bugurl="URL:http://sourceforge.ne
** [all] Error 2
--
Summary: [4.3 regression] 4.3 20080215 snapshot build failure
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: regression
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc do
--- Comment #3 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-02-16 23:36
---
I checked and I have at-file.texi in the distributions of both 20080208 and
20080215 snapshots. Located under /libiberty.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35218
--- Comment #9 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-02-17 19:40
---
With that patch I'm now getting:
(echo "@set version-GCC 4.3.0"; \
if [ "experimental" = "experimental" ]; \
then echo "@set DEVELOPMENT"; \
else echo "@c
--- Comment #2 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-02-19 02:45
---
Confirmed. 4.2.2 produces unnecessary pushes and pops. 4.3.0 causes worse code
than 4.2.x and adds unnecessary moves. Adding const or pure function attributes
do not seem to help in 4.3.0.
--
eric dot
--- Comment #29 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-02-19 02:47
---
Rask's patch (gcc-4.3-bug-11180-experimental.patch) causes worse code for the
test case in bug #32871, than without the patch.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11180
--- Comment #7 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-02-20 20:34
---
Created an attachment (id=15187)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15187&action=view)
New patch
New patch using GET_MODE_SIZE as recommended.
--
eric dot weddington at atmel
--- Comment #3 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-02-22 04:02
---
Can you try using linker relaxation?:
-Wl,--relax
Linker relaxation is implemented in ld for the AVR port, even though the
documentation doesn't say so. IIRC, tail call optimization is implemented in
l
--- Comment #2 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-03-09 05:43
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 35073 ***
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #8 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-03-09 05:43
---
*** Bug 35506 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-03-23 03:04
---
*** Bug 35508 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #3 from eric dot weddington at atmel dot com 2008-03-23 03:04
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 34210 ***
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
eric dot weddington at atmel dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last
[23s]
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: eric dot weddington at atmel dot com
GCC host
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
