[Bug tree-optimization/81679] use attribute unused on function arguments as an optimization hint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81679 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/89180] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wunused warnings

||2019-02-04 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- Confirmed as a useful grouping.

[Bug target/63651] Lot of failures in obj(c|-c++) with yosemite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651 --- Comment #20 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #18) > For the record with darwin15 I had to add > > /System/Library/Frameworks/Foundation.framework/Versions/C/Headers/ > NSEnumerator.h > /System/Library/Fra

[Bug objc++/56604] Missing obj-c++.srcman target

at gcc dot gnu.org |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- I can probably do this; taking

[Bug c/89201] Secret/Necessary memset() is Eliminated when Compiling at -O1/O2/O3 (Insecure Compiler Optimization)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89201 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/71302] -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant: misleading caret location for pointer in function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71302 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/63197] tc-m68k.c: Wrong warning "array subscript is below array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jan-Benedict Glaw from comment #2) > With today's binutils snapshot, there's a gas_assert in front of it, which > silences this bogus warning. That needs to be reverted to test GCC wrt. this > is

[Bug middle-end/21014] read-rtl.c:670: warning: missing sentinel in function call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21014 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to dave from comment #5) > Subject: Re: read-rtl.c:670: warning: missing sentinel in function call > > > result = concat ("(", cond1, ") && (", cond2, ")", NULL); > > > > > > Looks like someon

[Bug bootstrap/45174] Make fails in zlib

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45174 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/39533] [6/7/8 Regression] -MM may list a header file twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39533 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/78352] GCC lacks support for the Apple "blocks" extension to the C family of languages

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78352 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to René J.V. Bertin from comment #4) > Any news on this front? Last I heard from Iain he was still having to deal with water damage to his office...

[Bug libgcc/61152] Missing GCC Runtime Library Exception in some files that are included in libgcc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61152 --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager --- There have been a bunch of commits for this bug; is it fixed yet?

[Bug web/82686] Debian sid powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu 4.13.0-1-powerpc64 bootstrap breaks in stage3 with unexpected requirement for bdw-gc

||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill ||a/show_bug.cgi?id=85440 Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #17 from Eric Gallager --- (In

[Bug objc/50909] Process "#pragma options align=reset" correctly on Mac OS X

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50909 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug objc/53905] -Wformat-nonliteral gives false positives with __attribute__((format(NSString,...)))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53905 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/81837] Internal compiler error (cp/typeck2.c:1264)

||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Vegard Nossum from comment #5) > This looks like it has been fixed, maybe somebody can confirm and change > status. Output is now: $ /usr

[Bug bootstrap/54696] Makefile doesn't propagate CPPFLAGS to host libraries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54696 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC|egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu|egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/81837] Internal compiler error (cp/typeck2.c:1264)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81837 --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #8) > In any case, please always set the Target Milestone when closing a bug. I thought that was just for regressions...

[Bug other/30920] Incorrect splaying that not assures the caching property

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30920 --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- Does the patch still apply?

[Bug other/44286] Use sentinel attributes in GCC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44286 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Ralf Wildenhues from comment #2) > Patch at . Does the patch still apply?

[Bug other/44435] gengtype: don't test undefined value after vasprintf failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44435 --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #5) > Subject: Re: gengtype: don't test undefined value after > vasprintf failure > > On Mon, 7 Jun 2010, dj at redhat dot com wrote: > > > > If the libib

[Bug c/37200] duplicate warning message with braced initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37200 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallage

[Bug c/36941] gcc does not reject invalid cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36941 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||accepts-invalid, diagnostic

[Bug c/49702] Undefined static functions resolve to external definitions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49702 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug other/63613] dejagnu.h needs to be fix included

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63613 --- Comment #12 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #11) > Patch posted as https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-12/msg00468.html Does this still apply?

[Bug middle-end/51677] don't suggest giving main() __attribute__((const))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51677 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #3) > It should be easy to white-list the main function in the > -Wsuggest-attribute= checker. At the same time, I'm not sure it's necessary > or that the problem is un

[Bug objc/53345] some OPT_Wformat is enabled by default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53345 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/43797] __attribute__((deprecated("message"))) produces unexpected messages in some cases.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43797 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug other/35511] release scripts added release note to zlib/ChangeLog, not zlib/ChangeLog.gcj

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35511 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/23087] Misleading warning, "... differ in signedness"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23087 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic, documentation --- Comment #1

[Bug c/85562] -Wsuggest-attribute=malloc misleads about "returning normally"

Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2018-04-30 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/85563] [8 regression] -Wmaybe-uninitialized false alarm regression with __builtin_unreachable and GCC 8

||7.3.0 Keywords||diagnostic Last reconfirmed||2018-04-30 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Blocks||24639 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug fortran/78798] [cleanup] some int-valued functions should be bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78798 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/79586] missing -Wdeprecated depending on position of attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79586 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c/85678] -fno-common should be default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85678 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/71769] Invalid warning from -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations for a finite loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71769 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/85676] Obsolete function declarations should have warnings by default

|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- Dup of bug 82922 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 82922 ***

[Bug c/82922] Request: add -Wstrict-prototypes to -Wextra as K&R style is obsolescent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82922 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||david at westcontrol dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/85593] [6,7,8,9 Regression] GCC on ARM allocates R3 for local variable when calling naked function with O2 optimizations enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85593 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Known

[Bug bootstrap/32815] crtstuff.c,warning, will always evaluate as 'true'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32815 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug other/25914] strsignal.c:558: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25914 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/37759] powerpc option -mabi=no-spe still generates SPE instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37759 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/49656] internal compiler error on Mac OS 10.7.0

||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |INVALID --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to andreas from comment #3) > I just compiled GCC 4.6.1 again without clang after I found out how to do > that. > > By defining >

[Bug bootstrap/44756] [meta-bug] --enable-werror-always issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44756 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/47093] [meta-bug]: broken configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093 Bug 47093 depends on bug 47098, which changed state. Bug 47098 Summary: i686-openbsd3.0: OBSD_LIB_SPEC missing https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47098 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug target/47098] i686-openbsd3.0: OBSD_LIB_SPEC missing

||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Bernhard Reutner-Fischer from comment #4) > Fixed on the trunk. If trunk was 6 at the time, then this bug is fixed overall, since no ol

[Bug target/47093] [meta-bug]: broken configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093 Bug 47093 depends on bug 48904, which changed state. Bug 48904 Summary: x86_64-knetbsd-gnu fails to build https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48904 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/48904] x86_64-knetbsd-gnu fails to build

||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Bernhard Reutner-Fischer from comment #5) > Fixed on the trunk. If trunk was 6 at the time, then this bug is fixed overall, since no ol

[Bug target/47093] [meta-bug]: broken configurations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47093 Bug 47093 depends on bug 55143, which changed state. Bug 55143 Summary: vms-c.o:(.toc+0x0): undefined reference to `c_default_pointer_mode' (building cc1plus) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55143 What|Removed

[Bug target/55143] vms-c.o:(.toc+0x0): undefined reference to `c_default_pointer_mode' (building cc1plus)

||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Bernhard Reutner-Fischer from comment #5) > Fixed on the trunk for 5.0. > > Eventual backport including beef-up of the impl is left to

[Bug middle-end/54664] expand_gimple_cond warning for predictably small BRANCH_COST

||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Known to fail|4.10.0 |5.0 --- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Hans-Peter Nilsson from comment #1) > Also seen for 4.9.1 and 4.10.0 i.e. trunk r212879. 4.10.0 became 5.0

[Bug target/58801] 4.7.2 alpha-dec-vms fails to link java front end due to language independent incpath.c:target_c_incpath referencing lanuage dependent vms.c:vms_c_register_includes

||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jay from comment #0) > This is likely fixed in versions. > Recording here for either posterity, or to fix in 4.7.newer, or for > people

[Bug jit/66594] jitted code should use -mtune=native

||2018-05-07 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- Confirming as an enhancement

[Bug jit/66783] No error-checking for creating structs containing opaque structs

||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Resolution|--- |FIXED --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #5) > Keeping this open until it's committed to the gcc-5-branch gcc-5-branch is closed so this bug can b

[Bug jit/66627] [meta-bug] Tracker bug for jit bugs affecting ravi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66627 Bug 66627 depends on bug 66783, which changed state. Bug 66783 Summary: No error-checking for creating structs containing opaque structs https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66783 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug jit/66811] RFE: have jit dumps be compileable as C code

||2018-05-07 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- Confirming as an enhancement

[Bug jit/66812] jit code-generation example that unexpectedly required -fno-strict-aliasing to work

||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #10) > Candidate patch posted as: > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/jit/2015-q3/msg00060.html adding "patch" keyword

[Bug other/85716] No easy way for end-user to tell what GCC is doing when compilation is slow

||2018-05-10 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- I think I remember someone suggesting a progress bar at one point; it involved hacking the pass manager

[Bug target/82092] [8/9 regression] gcc fails to link genmodes on darwin (cfiStartsArray[i] != cfiStartsArray[i-1])

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82092 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|gcc fails to link genmodes |[8/9 regression] gcc fails

[Bug tree-optimization/85741] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wformat-overflow

||2018-05-10 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- Confirming that this is a useful meta-bug.

[Bug other/61257] configure should check if sys/sdt.h is usable, not just checking the existance of the header

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61257 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build, patch Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug target/65604] MIPS -fno-delayed-branch generates incorrect code with -mcheck-zero-division

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65604 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68950] [fortran] gfc_format_decoder cannot handle %qE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68950 --- Comment #9 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #8) > (In reply to vries from comment #6) > > posted RFC: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-12/msg01749.html > > pinged: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-0

[Bug c++/66662] Request: Change #error directive displaying

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/85783] alloc-size-larger-than fires incorrectly with new[] and can't be disabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85783 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug preprocessor/77810] provide format_inform_at_substring to go with format_warning_at_substring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77810 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/38087] g++ accepts invalid destructor call

|WAITING >Last reconfirmed||2017-08-14 > CC| |egallager at gcc dot gnu.org > Ever confirmed|0 |1 > > --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- > (In reply to Andrew Pins

[Bug web/85837] Listing of all error and warning messages

||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org, ||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0) > > Now, the GCC manual does

[Bug testsuite/67958] The tests changed by r223498 now FAILs on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67958 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1) > Created attachment 39731 [details] > Patch fixing the failures with the patches for pr71767 please send this patch to gcc-patches for review

[Bug middle-end/85643] attribute nonstring fails to squash -Wstringop-truncation warning at an offset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85643 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/81693] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr25967-*.c -O* execution test on darwin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81693 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/63545] ICE when building GCC for ia64-hp-hpux11.23 in hash_table::find_slot_with_hash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63545 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1

[Bug target/28689] Cross compile internal error.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28689 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/72769] ifstream Optimed Out ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72769 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/82914] 'struct __attribute__ ((aligned (N))) s' ignores 'aligned' attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82914 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #5) > (In reply to Paul Eggert from comment #4) > > Here, GCC says the alignment of 'b' is 1, not 8. What happened to the > > attribute? > > GCC silently drops it, with

[Bug c++/85861] g++ -Wconversion misses int to size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85861 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses fold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 --- Comment #14 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12) > (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #11) > > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10) > > > Note this needs at least: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p

[Bug c++/85861] g++ -Wconversion misses int to size_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85861 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7 f

[Bug c++/79996] spurious -Wreturn-type on a function that calls a noreturn function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79996 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- Might want to revisit this now that -Wreturn-type is on by default

[Bug c++/81873] spurious -Wreturn-type calling a locally declared noreturn function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81873 --- Comment #5 from Eric Gallager --- -Wreturn-type is on by default now.

[Bug c++/80140] missing -Wignored-attributes on function arguments; can lead to spurious -Wunused-parameter or -Wreturn-type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80140 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|missing |missing |-Wignored-att

[Bug c++/59922] -finstrument-functions emit false warning "control reaches end of non-void function"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59922 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- Kinda more important now that -Wreturn-type is on by default

[Bug bootstrap/85850] [9 Regression] gcc 9.0 doesn't compile with Xcode 9.3.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85850 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug objc/50909] Process "#pragma options align=reset" correctly on Mac OS X

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50909 --- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Rudolf from comment #12) > This is still an issue... 7 YEARS LEATER!? > > I tried to change the permission on USB.h just to get around this bug... > > with something like this: > #if defined(_

[Bug c/69558] [6/7/8/9 Regression] glib2 warning pragmas stopped working

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558 --- Comment #23 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #22) > Assigning this to me in the hope that I'll get to it in gcc 9 stage 1. It's gcc 9 stage 1 now.

[Bug c++/66159] bogus warning for alias-declaration using elaborated-type-specifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66159 --- Comment #4 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > Patch for stage 1: > > diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.c b/gcc/cp/parser.c > index 4fa546a086c..4dc4e751b28 100644 > --- a/gcc/cp/parser.c > +++ b/gcc/cp/parser.c >

[Bug tree-optimization/33915] iv folding fails with pointer iterations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33915 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/44803] LIBRARY_PATH should work on cross-compilers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44803 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/12411] Missed -Wsequence-point on functions (example reduced from historical GCC source)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12411 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|GCC depends on undefined|Missed -Wsequence-point on

[Bug target/82092] [8/9 regression] gcc fails to link genmodes on darwin (cfiStartsArray[i] != cfiStartsArray[i-1])

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82092 --- Comment #13 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Claus-Justus Heine from comment #12) > Still no go, even with that patch: > > ./auto-host.h:2396:16: error: declaration does not declare anything > [-fpermissive] > #define rlim_t long > > An

[Bug fortran/32957] C/Fortran interoperability and -fdefault-integer-8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32957 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to dominiq from comment #6) > Author: dominiq > Date: Mon Feb 26 09:55:39 2018 > New Revision: 257985 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257985&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > 2018-02-26 Dominiqu

[Bug other/86095] stale documentation for -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations

|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed||2018-06-08 CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Eric Gallager --- Confirmed.

[Bug testsuite/32064] ssp tests can't find libssp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32064 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > Still an issue, e.g. on Solaris 11. > > > > You can try my patches from 2007 to see if they > work for you. They're almost 11 years old

[Bug fortran/54687] Use gcc option machinery for gfortran

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54687 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/61579] -Wwrite-strings does not behave as a warning option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61579 --- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2) > Confirmed. I might possibly get to this. For gcc 9 maybe?

[Bug tree-optimization/43432] Missed vectorization: "complicated access pattern" for increasing and decreasing data indexing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43432 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/37210] Discourage Default Builds in the GCC Source Tree more strongly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37210 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug driver/80271] Support environment variable CLICOLOR_FORCE to enable -fdiagnostics-color

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80271 --- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Adam Borowski from comment #6) > Created attachment 44260 [details] > patch for CLICOLOR_FORCE > > So, here's a patch. Please send patches to the gcc-patches mailing list for review.

[Bug c/80942] -Woverlength-strings should no longer be implied by -Wpedantic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80942 --- Comment #8 from Eric Gallager --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #7) > If this bug is fixed, then it should no longer be necessary to explicitly > specify -Wno-overlength-strings when building GCC itself. I could submit a > patch rem

[Bug c++/33979] support for char16_t, char32_t

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33979 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #21 from Eric Gallag

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >