http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55219
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-07
22:28:36 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Nov 7 22:28:32 2012
New Revision: 193313
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193313
Log:
PR middle-end/55219
* fold-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55219
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot|
|gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55219
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-07
22:37:10 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Nov 7 22:37:01 2012
New Revision: 193315
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193315
Log:
PR middle-end/55219
* fold
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55219
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|4.6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #22 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-07
22:43:00 UTC ---
> (,%eax,4) generates a 0x67 address-size prefix, which zero-extends
> 32-bit address to 64-bit.
OK, I see. Then it would be interesting to have a testcase that generates th
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #24 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-08
16:11:25 UTC ---
> I applied i386 change at
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28591
>
> to compile it:
>
> [hjl@gnu-tools-1 tmp]$ /export/build/gnu/gcc/release/usr/gcc-4.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55177
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-08
16:14:23 UTC ---
> I think I have the GCC version checks right there, for the availability of the
> builtins? That is, __builtin_bswap32() and __builtin_bswap64() since GCC 4.4,
> and __builtin_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #27 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-08
17:17:35 UTC ---
> No, this would be one giant kludge by itself. The failure just shows that the
> controversial patch [1] for PR 49721 was wrong.
>
> Quote from [1]:
>
> --quote--
> I am
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55142
--- Comment #29 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-08
23:21:44 UTC ---
> So for POINTERS_EXTEND_UNSIGNED > 0, we should transform
>
> (zero_extend:DI (plus:SI (FOO:SI) (const_int Y)))
>
> in such a way that it won't cause ICE and zero-extend t
||2012-11-09
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-09
10:07:01 UTC ---
This occurred to me
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52438
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-09
21:42:06 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Nov 9 21:42:02 2012
New Revision: 193375
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193375
Log:
PR other/52438
* s-taspri-l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52438
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2012-11-09
21:42:25 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Fri Nov 9 21:42:21 2012
New Revision: 193376
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=193376
Log:
PR other/52438
* s-taspri-l
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46232
--- Comment #10 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-18
12:52:45 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sat Dec 18 12:52:41 2010
New Revision: 168023
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168023
Log:
PR tree-optimization/46232
* gcc.dg/tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46232
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-18
17:35:48 UTC ---
> I wonder if this wouldn't fix it (at least, that's similar to how lex.c guards
> calling of _cpp_process_line_notes). I can't reproduce it myself, so have to
> guess...
The proble
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #22795|0 |1
is obsolete|
||2010.12.19 08:55:31
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Version|4.5.4 |4.6.0
Summary|missed optimization in |missed optimization in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46729
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-19
12:19:16 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Dec 19 12:19:12 2010
New Revision: 168049
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168049
Log:
PR target/46729
* config/sparc/sparc.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46729
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-19
12:20:12 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Sun Dec 19 12:20:08 2010
New Revision: 168050
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168050
Log:
PR target/46729
* config/sparc/sparc.h
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46729
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46729
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.0 |4.5.2
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47038
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
at gcc dot |ebotcazou at gcc dot
|gnu.org |gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-24
16:09:03 UTC ---
Investigating.
gcc dot|
|gnu.org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ebotcazou at gcc dot
|gnu.org |gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-24
21:12:12 UTC ---
Investigating.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
gcc dot|
|gnu.org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ebotcazou at gcc dot
|gnu.org |gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-28
15:23:28 UTC ---
Investigating.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47038
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Summary|gcc.dg/pr46685.c
||2010.12.29 15:45:07
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Summary|[4.6 Regression] ACATS |[4.6 Regression] ACATS
|c62002a wrong code on |c62002a is
at gcc dot |ebotcazou at gcc dot
|gnu.org |gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-29
16:22:50 UTC ---
Investigating.
-linux-gnueabi |
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Summary|ada bootstrap failure on|[4.6 Regression] Ada
|arm
||ebotcazou at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #1 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-29
16:34:01 UTC ---
Already reported.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 46704 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47121
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||laurent at guerby dot net
--- Comment #2
||2010.12.29 16:35:46
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ebotcazou at gcc dot
|gnu.org |gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-29
16:35:46 UTC ---
Investigating.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46801
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-29
16:40:47 UTC ---
> Proposed fix posted to the mailing list:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01912.html
Thanks a lot!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47038
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-30
21:31:07 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Dec 30 21:31:04 2010
New Revision: 168351
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168351
Log:
PR target/47038
* config/sparc/sparc.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47038
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2010.12.31 17:14:07
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
Summary
gcc dot|
|gnu.org |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ebotcazou at gcc dot
|gnu.org |gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2010-12-31
17:14:49 UTC ---
Investigating.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47138
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47138
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47138
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-02
18:18:23 UTC ---
> The rev. doesn't have a testcase (and it didn't fix a bug?).
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-04/msg00056.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47138
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46685
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-03
12:06:23 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 3 12:06:19 2011
New Revision: 168418
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168418
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12-30 Eri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47038
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-03
12:06:23 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 3 12:06:19 2011
New Revision: 168418
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168418
Log:
Backport from mainline
2010-12-30 Eric
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47131
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-03
17:20:10 UTC ---
Created attachment 22886
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22886
Tentative fix (for gcc/ada)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-03
23:59:58 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 3 23:59:55 2011
New Revision: 168447
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168447
Log:
PR middle-end/47017
* expr.c (expand_ex
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47017
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47131
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-04
08:58:05 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 08:58:02 2011
New Revision: 168454
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168454
Log:
PR ada/47131
* gcc-interface/trans.c (I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47131
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
URL|http://www.dr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|ada |tree-optimization
--- Comment #6 from Eri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-04
10:53:14 UTC ---
Created attachment 22895
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22895
Tentative fix
This doesn't change GIMPLE but instead tweaks reachability analysis.
gcc dot|
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-04
10:57:54 UTC ---
Reconfirm with an up-to-date tree, ACATS was clean on i586/SJLJ this morning.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|ada
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47131
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-04
17:17:34 UTC ---
> I'm wondering if this change to trans.c now causes SJLJ targets to pass the
> pack9 test as a side effect?
Looking at the aforementioned PR 46801 will give you the answer. :-)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
--- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-04
23:18:15 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 23:18:12 2011
New Revision: 168490
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168490
Log:
PR preprocessor/39213
* directives.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
--- Comment #20 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-04
23:18:55 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 23:18:52 2011
New Revision: 168492
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168492
Log:
PR preprocessor/39213
* directives.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
--- Comment #19 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-04
23:18:32 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 23:18:29 2011
New Revision: 168491
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168491
Log:
PR preprocessor/39213
* directives.c (
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39213
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-04
23:22:35 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Tue Jan 4 23:22:31 2011
New Revision: 168493
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168493
Log:
PR tree-optimization/47056
* cgraphbuil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47056
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-05
11:23:43 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 5 11:23:40 2011
New Revision: 168508
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168508
Log:
PR tree-optimization/47005
* tree-sra.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-05
13:54:30 UTC ---
> ACATS 62002a now passes, thanks.
Thanks for confirming. ACATS is clean on both i386 and i586 Linux SJLJ now,
are there any remaining failures on BSD platforms?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
--- Comment #14 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-05
15:33:24 UTC ---
> The regression tests just completed for OpenBSD i386.
> There is one failure on ACATS (cb1010a timeout)*
This is a stack checking test.
> 3) the STACK_CHECK_STATIC_BUILTIN macro
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-05
16:55:57 UTC ---
> Regarding the ten "stack-check" tests as I can them (c5210[3x,4x,4y],
> cb1010[a,c,d], null_deref[1,2], stack-check[1,2]), I now understand that
> it is expected that these tests
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-06
23:36:28 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Jan 6 23:36:25 2011
New Revision: 168557
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168557
Log:
PR debug/46704
* dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out
||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
||atches/2011-01/msg00335.htm
||l
CC|ebotcazou at gcc dot|
|gnu.org |
Resolution
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-07
08:43:35 UTC ---
> I still see this with r168558.
Note that you need to reinstall gnatgcc, the problem is there.
||2011.01.07 09:45:51
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-07
09:45:51 UTC ---
Does it still fail
||ebotcazou at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Known to work||4.4.6, 4.5.3
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6|[4.3/4.6 Regression] Ada
|Regression] Ada ICE when|ICE when
||ebotcazou at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|4.3.6 |4.6.0
Summary|[4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6|[4.3/4.4/4.5 Regression
||ebotcazou at gcc dot
||gnu.org
Known to work||4.3.6
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|4.4.6 |4.6.0
Summary|[4.4/4.5/4.6
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47005
--- Comment #18 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-09
08:45:01 UTC ---
> For reference ACATS is now clean on arm-linux as well:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-01/msg00648.html
>
> LAST_UPDATED: Fri Jan 7 00:49:12 UTC 2011 (revision 168
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46230
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-10
12:12:07 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 10 12:11:59 2011
New Revision: 168627
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168627
Log:
PR testsuite/46230
* gcc.dg/vect/pr3380
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46230
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-10
12:41:43 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 10 12:41:40 2011
New Revision: 168628
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168628
Log:
PR testsuite/46230
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46230
--- Comment #9 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-10
12:51:03 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 10 12:51:00 2011
New Revision: 168629
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168629
Log:
PR testsuite/46230
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-v
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46230
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
--- Comment #11 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-11
06:54:41 UTC ---
> I am at 168616 and seeing this. I am on Fedora 14 64 bit with this native gcc:
>
> $ gcc --version
> gcc (GCC) 4.4.5 20101112 (Red Hat 4.4.5-2)
>
> I am trying to use that to buil
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46704
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-12
07:47:09 UTC ---
> It looks like the fix came after the first gcc was built, so I should rebuild
> it with Jan 9 snapshot using --disable-bootstrap, install it, and then rebuild
> it again with disabl
gcc dot|
|gnu.org |
Component|target |testsuite
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ebotcazou at gcc dot
|gnu.org |gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-12
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-12
10:52:28 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:52:25 2011
New Revision: 168701
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168701
Log:
PR testsuite/33033
* gcc.dg/20061124-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-12
10:53:24 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:53:21 2011
New Revision: 168702
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168702
Log:
PR testsuite/33033
* gcc.dg/20061124-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-12
10:54:01 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:53:59 2011
New Revision: 168703
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168703
Log:
PR testsuite/33033
* gcc.dg/20061124-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-12
10:54:38 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jan 12 10:54:36 2011
New Revision: 168704
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168704
Log:
PR testsuite/33033
* gcc.dg/20061124-1.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33033
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47246
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou
|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed||2011.01.12 12:05:15
Host|powerpc-apple-darwin9 |powerpc-*-*
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |ebotcazou at gcc dot
|gnu.org |gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46894
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47166
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39807
--- Comment #17 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-17
11:33:37 UTC ---
Probably WONTFIX at this point?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18580
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-17
12:35:26 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 17 12:35:21 2011
New Revision: 168897
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168897
Log:
PR target/46655
* xcoffout.c (ASM_OUTP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
--- Comment #16 from Eric Botcazou 2011-01-17
12:37:00 UTC ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Mon Jan 17 12:36:55 2011
New Revision: 168898
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=168898
Log:
PR target/46655
* xcoffout.c (ASM_OUTP
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
401 - 500 of 5444 matches
Mail list logo