mary: search_n uses == when it should use binary_pred
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gma
for non-dependent expressions
in return statements
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot
Summary: Rope iterators are not InputIterators
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug
cc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38174
--- Comment #4 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2005-11-12 11:33
---
This is not a bug. TR1 3.5 refers to member function pointers, not member data
pointers as in the submitted test case. mem_fn has no result_type for member
data pointers because the constness of the result type
--- Comment #2 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2005-11-12 13:23
---
I don't know how to classify this. The basic problem is one that isn't
really solveable without rvalue references: you can't pass a literal
(e.g., 0) into the operator() of a reference_wrapp
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-pc
--- Comment #1 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2005-11-12 13:31
---
Created an attachment (id=10225)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10225&action=view)
Mainline (4.1.0) patch to test and fix this problem
The fix is trivial. The changes to the test cas
--- Comment #4 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2006-09-12 18:27
---
It's a chicken-and-egg problem. Nobody on the committee wants to standardize
anything that isn't "existing practice," but we only want to accept patches for
features that have been writ
--- Comment #3 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-01-29 13:50
---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01828.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29993
--- Comment #6 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-02-26 15:26
---
This looks like a straightforward fix to build_common_tree_nodes2.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30666
--- Comment #8 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-03-03 19:50
---
Patch is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00191.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30666
--- Comment #1 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-03-27 15:10
---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00799.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31141
--- Comment #2 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-03-27 15:10
---
Does the following patch solve the problem?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00799.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31372
--- Comment #1 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-03-27 15:12
---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00799.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31140
--- Comment #4 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-03-27 15:12
---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-03/msg00799.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31138
--
doug dot gregor at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |doug dot gregor at gmail dot
|dot org
--- Comment #3 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2008-09-24 06:01
---
Patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-09/msg01667.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37553
--- Comment #5 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2008-10-14 16:03
---
Fixed on mainline
--
doug dot gregor at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
t with g++
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44715
d at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21802
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doug dot gregor at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30571
--- Comment #2 from doug dot gregor at gmail dot com 2007-01-24 04:36
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> This is the normal problem adding a keyword in any language, I don't see why
> C++0x 's static_assert not use a keyword in the already reserved identifier
>
23 matches
Mail list logo
