o error (java.util.zip.ZipException: Deflated stream
ends early.)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-04-23 16:31 ---
Created an attachment (id=11318)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11318&action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27271
Summary: g++ crash on invalid code
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-11-12 06:04 ---
Created an attachment (id=16657)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16657&action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38089
le-use
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profile
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38292
failure on spu-elf
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: spu
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: ia64-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38326
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-01 11:08 ---
doing this, but it will be slow ...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38344
--- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-01 11:16 ---
afaics no ia64 specific changes besides the proposed patch for pr27880 to
configure --with-system-libunwind.
trunk fails as well, build log at
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gcc-snapshot/20081130-0ubuntu1/+build
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-01 10:59 ---
Created an attachment (id=16800)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16800&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38344
ink.cc
(ICE in invariant_for_use)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu d
--- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-02 10:14 ---
works with -O0
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38369
optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38369
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38370
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-02 10:12 ---
Created an attachment (id=16807)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16807&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38369
ponent: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: arm-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38419
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-05 21:45 ---
Created an attachment (id=16837)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16837&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38419
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-06 06:59 ---
works with r142144, not with r142179; the only non-fortran patch between these
two revisions is
r142149 | ebotcazou | 2008-11-24 09:36:43 +0100 (Mon, 24 Nov 2008) | 4 lines
* df-scan.c (df_get_call_refs): For
--- Comment #8 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-08 22:32 ---
a current snapshot from the branch, exluding r142149 works for me. I'll try to
reduce the applied patches until the builds succeeds again with r142149, but
again, this may take a while.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Comment #10 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-08 23:42 ---
> So are the dates in your first message correct or not?
hmm, did reply to this, but probably in another report ...
"seen with 4.3.3 20081029, seen the last successful bootstrap with 20081022,
not
seen on t
--- Comment #12 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-09 15:28 ---
sorry for not noticing earlier; indeded, this is a patch by CodeSourcery to
enable to build libobjc.
see http://lists.debian.org/debian-gcc/2008/04/msg00240.html
I don't see this defined on the trunk. I suppose
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-09 19:50 ---
which versions of binutils/glibc are used? for debian these are binutils-2.18.1
and glibc-2.7.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38326
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-12 20:21 ---
this now works without the definition of DH_USES
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-16 08:49 ---
The most recent complete build logs can be seen at
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?&pkg=gcc-snapshot&ver=20081130-1&arch=armel&stamp=1228429623&file=log
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20414304/bu
nu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: hppa-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-21 12:50 ---
Created an attachment (id=16952)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16952&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
--- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-21 12:51 ---
Created an attachment (id=16953)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16953&action=view)
build log
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-21 12:58 ---
precompiled header file at:
http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/tmp/_precompiled.incl.gch.bz2
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-12-22 10:58 ---
no, same result.
btw, in the generated .ii file using -D__disable_PCH__ -save-temps, the
precompiled header is still referenced.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
--- Comment #7 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-05 18:33 ---
> Can you reproduce it with vanilla trunk?
yes.
now, building with binutils 2.18 and glibc-2.7 lets the build succeed, building
with binutils-2.19 and glibc-2.9 (Ubuntu jaunty) lets the build fail. I'm
trying
--- Comment #8 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-05 18:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=17034)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17034&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38593
other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38732
--- Comment #9 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-09 13:32 ---
yes, fastjar is segfaulting for the test
fastjar -cf conftest.jar
seen as well, when building with current 4.1 and 4.2 branches. a fastjar built
with 3.4.6 works ok.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Comment #23 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-11 08:30 ---
r143261 is needed for the backport as well.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38396
--- Comment #10 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-15 18:38 ---
checked the patch with trunk 20090115:
=== libstdc++ tests ===
Running target unix
XPASS: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/c99_classification_macros_c.cc (test for
excess errors)
=== libstdc
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-18 10:01 ---
yes, I do see this failure again as well.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38902
unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38933
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-22 11:57 ---
Created an attachment (id=17161)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17161&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38933
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-22 12:38 ---
20090111 is ok, 20090117 not.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38933
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-28 17:08 ---
PR38292 shows similiar error messages
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38977
generation.
--
Summary: [4.3 regression] wrong code building libgsf
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot
--- Comment #6 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-29 05:41 ---
the fix for this causes http://bugs.debian.org/513420
a miscompilation of libgsf with the gcc-4_3-branch, filed as PR39015.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38615
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-29 10:14 ---
when Ray wrote he tested with a snapshot build, I assume this was 20090107
without the patch applied, so the status on the trunk is not known yet. will
test with current trunk later.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #10 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-01-29 22:36 ---
I'm able to reproduce it with trunk 20090129. The gsf-scan executable links
against the just built libgsf.so, so I assume we have to look for a miscompiled
file in libgsf.
--
doko at ubuntu dot com ch
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-06-20 01:21 ---
The SH port does use a linker script to link with both -lgcc_s and -lgcc.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40134
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-06-22 11:20 ---
updated patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2009-06/msg01724.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40286
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-06-22 15:35 ---
fixed in rev 148806.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40286
mal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: arm-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40523
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-06-22 23:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=18050)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18050&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40523
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-07-01 09:37 ---
fixed
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: arm-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40651
--- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-07-13 18:16 ---
this is with a minimal "int main() { return 0; }
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: arm-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40735
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-07-13 19:37 ---
Created an attachment (id=18188)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18188&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40735
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-07-14 10:31 ---
my bad, should be -std=gnu99 instead: gcc-4.2 -S -o /dev/null -g
-fstack-protector -fPIE -Os test_node.i -std=gnu99
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40735
--- Comment #8 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-07-24 14:37 ---
same behaviour with the 4.4.1 release
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38292
--- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-07-26 10:37 ---
seen on sparc-linux-gnu as well
Matthias
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version: 4.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25033
glibc-2.4
based system
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-08-11 22:47 ---
Created an attachment (id=12069)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12069&action=view)
test log
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28701
--- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-08-17 22:40 ---
ecj.jar is from eclipse-3.2, copied the file to
http://people.ubuntu.com/~doko/ecj.jar
gcj-4.2 -v \
-O2 -g -Wl,-Bsymbolic -shared -fPIC -fjni -findirect-dispatch \
-o /tmp/ecj.jar.so /usr/share/java
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-08-18 11:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=12091)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12091&action=view)
example
more simple example from the gettext source, compiled with
gcj -C gnu/gettext/GetURL.java
gcj -
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-08-23 10:20 ---
I see the problem with stlport 4.6.2:
- stlport is built on a glibc-2.3 based system (using g++-4.0)
- libstdc++/g++-4.1 is built on a glibc-2.4 based system
- building the stlport regression tests using the installed
itionally weak symbols referenced/generated
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29289
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2006-09-29 17:46 ---
Created an attachment (id=12355)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12355&action=view)
difference of symbols (objdump -T)
sources and binaries for the shared library at
http://people.ubuntu.com/~d
: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: driver
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30714
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2007-02-06 18:02 ---
confirmed with trunk 20070206
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2007-09-02 11:21 ---
Subject: Re: New: [4.3 Regression] libjava fails to compile
if configure argument contains "version"
belyshev at depni dot sinp dot msu dot ru schrieb:
> When gcc is configured with, for example, "--
t: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37389
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-09-05 22:29 ---
Created an attachment (id=16237)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16237&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37389
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: i486-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37390
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-09-05 22:43 ---
Created an attachment (id=16238)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16238&action=view)
example
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37390
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: web
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37391
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-09-06 00:32 ---
can't reproduce this either with the Debian or Ubuntu gcc builds
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37383
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-09-06 14:18 ---
> So I don't know what else to say
mark as duplicate of PR 323?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37390
CONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: hppa-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37396
Summary: [4.4 regression] bootstrap broken on ia64-linux-gnu
trunk with ada (20080906)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #28 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-09-06 22:53 ---
so this bites again with trunk and ada. Jim, Steve, any news on this?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27880
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: sparc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37406
NCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37636
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37772
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-10-12 09:04 ---
closing. works for me with current 4.3.2
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
t_add_function_parameters (bootstrap
error)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-10-13 05:13 ---
seen as well with a powerpc biarch compiler, defaulting to powerpc-linux-gnu.
reverting this patch lets the build continue, but fails later with:
/build/buildd/gcc-snapshot-20081012/build/./prev-gcc/xgcc
-B/build/buildd
--- Comment #3 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-10-14 07:21 ---
reverting r141077 on current trunk lets the bootstrap succeed on sparc-linux
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
ned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37856
Component: libgcj
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37871
--- Comment #7 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-10-21 18:01 ---
fixed with the cp-0.98 merge
--
doko at ubuntu dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2008-10-22 22:57 ---
can't see these with 141308: please could you recheck?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37893
--- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-02-12 13:04 ---
still seen with a backport of the patch to the 4.3 branch and with trunk
20090211 on amd64. works on i486.
gcc -pthread -c -fno-strict-aliasing -DNDEBUG -g -fwrapv -O3 -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -fprofile-use -I. -IInclude
--- Comment #23 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-02-12 13:40 ---
PR38292 is still seen with trunk 20090211 on amd64, works for i486.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38977
--- Comment #4 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-02-12 14:06 ---
Created an attachment (id=17286)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17286&action=view)
thread.c source file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38292
--- Comment #5 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-02-12 14:09 ---
Created an attachment (id=17287)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17287&action=view)
thread_pthread.h header
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38292
--- Comment #6 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-02-12 15:40 ---
a build with the suggested change doesn't show any change.
--- gcc/calls.c~2009-02-05 09:30:24.0 +0100
+++ gcc/calls.c 2009-02-12 15:17:08.0 +0100
@@ -530,6 +530,8 @@
}
el
--- Comment #7 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-02-14 09:08 ---
seen as well on sparc-linux, x86_64-linux and i486-linux (when built with
-mcpu=i686 -mtune=i586), although triggered in different files.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38292
c
Version: 4.3.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC host triplet: i486-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39431
--- Comment #1 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-03-11 14:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=17437)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17437&action=view)
preprocessed source
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39431
--- Comment #2 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-03-11 14:09 ---
tested 4.3.4 SVN 20090301 and 4.4.0 SVN 20090225.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39431
--- Comment #11 from doko at ubuntu dot com 2009-03-12 23:02 ---
applied to the 4.3 branch it fixes the problem; no regressions in the testsuite
for a biarch build on i486-linux-gnu with --enable-languages=c,c++
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39431
nu dot org
ReportedBy: doko at ubuntu dot com
GCC target triplet: powerpc-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39461
1 - 100 of 328 matches
Mail list logo
