--- Comment #7 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 00:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=15957)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15957&action=view)
fixes DECL_CONTEXT() of the temporary variables in the initialiser
So this patch seems to make the crash
--- Comment #8 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-25 00:04 ---
By the way, I can reproduce the problem on trunk. I think I was lacking sleep
when I first said I could not reproduce it on trunk. Sorry.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36767
--- Comment #10 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 07:19 ---
Created an attachment (id=15968)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15968&action=view)
try scanning DECL_EXPR instead of VAR_DECLs directly.
@Jason: I have tried scanning DECL_EXPR and setti
--- Comment #11 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 10:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=15969)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15969&action=view)
update vars more specifically, adding BIND_EXPR
After talking with Jakub, it appeared that I was forget
--- Comment #13 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 17:01 ---
Created an attachment (id=15972)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15972&action=view)
reworked patch
Reworked patch to walk BIND_EXPR_VARs only. I think there is no need to walk
VAR_DE
effet"
--
Summary: typos in french translation.
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: translation
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36958
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #2 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-28 22:40 ---
Ah okay. So what is the email address to send the translation fixes to ?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36958
--- Comment #14 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 13:09 ---
Subject: Bug 36767
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Jul 30 13:07:50 2008
New Revision: 138308
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138308
Log:
2008-07-30 Dodji Seketeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #15 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-30 13:19 ---
Subject: Bug 36767
Author: dodji
Date: Wed Jul 30 13:18:31 2008
New Revision: 138309
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=138309
Log:
2008-07-30 Dodji Seketeli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Comment #2 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-07-31 12:22 ---
Created an attachment (id=15984)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15984&action=view)
candidate partial fix
This patch fixes the problem patially.
if you have:
void
foo ()
{
--- Comment #5 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-01 08:54 ---
Created an attachment (id=15988)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15988&action=view)
first fix attempt.
This patch fixes the problem for me on gcc-4_3-branch.
Regtested for x86_64 on
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org
--- Comment #7 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-01 09:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=15989)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15989&action=view)
fixed a typo.
Woops, thanks Paolo. I have Updated the patch.
--
dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-01 13:32 ---
Created an attachment (id=15991)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15991&action=view)
updated patch
> - the error message we give in this case is pretty poor. Here we have an
>empt
--- Comment #11 from dodji at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-08-01 17:54 ---
Doug, thanks for your comments.
I have submitted the patch to the list
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-08/msg00082.html.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36408
501 - 516 of 516 matches
Mail list logo
