http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850
--- Comment #5 from Dima ---
Why is this bug is still marked unconfirmed? Is there something I can do to
confirm it?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850
--- Comment #11 from Dima ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #9)
> Created attachment 30818 [details]
> patch
>
> Can you verify that this patch fixes the issue?
Yes, it works for me and makes abi-compliance-checker function once again.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57850
--- Comment #12 from Dima ---
Is this going to be applied for 4.9 & 4.8 series?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40868
--- Comment #16 from Dima 2010-09-27
22:13:18 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> (In reply to comment #14)
> > Created attachment 21898 [details] [details]
> > backport
> >
> > This is the backport I use against gcc-4.4
>
> dear dima, thanks f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337
Dima changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmitrij.ledkov at ubuntu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41337
--- Comment #4 from Dima 2010-11-17 21:02:58
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> If you encounter parallel build failures, please post exact revision that was
> built, configure command line, build system type, number of processors on the
> box, N
