https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81610
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bogus fix-it hint for a |[8 Regression] bogus fix-it
|8.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Summary|bogus fixit hint for|[8 Regression] bogus fixit
|undeclared memset: else |hint for undeclared memset
||2018-01-26
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|incomplete warning message |[6/7/8 Regression]
|with dos line endings |incomplete warning message
||with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83442
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2018-01-30
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
||koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84135
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Segfault reading through a NULL value for ubound here:
6032 ubound = GFC_TYPE_ARRAY_UBOUND (type, dim);
6033 if (as->upper[dim] && !INTEGER_CST_P (ubound))
Program received signal SIGSEGV,
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2018-01-30
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
||koenigni at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||2018-01-30
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed. Appears to have
||2018-01-30
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org,
||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed.
Appears to have
||2018-01-30
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed for trunk, gcc 7 and gcc 6; gcc 5 didn't have -fconcepts.
This asserti
||2018-01-30
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Summary|Compilation aborted when|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE when
|woking with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84136
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Summary|[
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84136
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Discussion/patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg02451.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84152
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2018-01-31
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed (with --target=powerpc-linux_spe and r257097 fwiw)
Assertion fails here:
#2 0x013584ef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84032
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 43309
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43309&action=edit
Dumpfile from sms pass (up to the assertion failure)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84152
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |---
Target Milestone|8.0 |7.4
Summary|[8 Regression] ICE in |[7 Regression] ICE in
|predicate_mem_writes, at|predicate_mem_writes, at
||2018-02-01
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|internal compiler error: in |[7 Regression] internal
|lambda_expr_this_capture, |compiler error: in
|at cp/lambda.c:785
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84183
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2018-02-02
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83390
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84195
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Arseny Solokha from comment #2)
> Trivial change to the testcase also makes gcc-8 ICE in
> mark_block_for_update():
Thanks; yes, I see this one segfault both trunk and gcc 7; gcc 6 is unaffected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
FWIW, in both cases the ICE started with r240865.
I have a fix for the ICE in comment #0, but not yet for the one in comment #2.
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: aarch64-redhat-linux
Created attachment 43349
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43349&acti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84252
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
In vt_add_function_parameter:
(gdb) p incoming
$6 = (parallel:OI [
(expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg:V4SI 32 v0 [ qIn0 ])
(const_int 0 [0]))
(expr_list:REG_DEP_TRUE (reg:V4SI 33 v1 [ qI
||2018-02-07
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81610
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Feb 7 17:55:54 2018
New Revision: 257456
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257456&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++: avoid most reserved words as misspelling suggestions (PR c++/81610
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80567
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Feb 7 17:55:54 2018
New Revision: 257456
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257456&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++: avoid most reserved words as misspelling suggestions (PR c++/81610
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81610
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80567
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
As noted in the fix for PR c++/81610 and PR c++/80567 here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-01/msg02200.html
> The C++
||2018-02-07
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84269
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80567
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #22 from David Malcolm ---
Assigning this to me in the hope that I'll get to it in gcc 9 stage 1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84258
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #4 from David Malcol
||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81419
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84281
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84178
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch/RFC:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-02/msg00468.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84136
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Feb 9 01:07:11 2018
New Revision: 257509
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=257509&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE in find_taken_edge_computed_goto (PR 84136)
PR 84136 reports a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84136
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7/8 Regression] ICE with |[6/7 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88147
--- Comment #17 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 45660
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45660&action=edit
Selftest coverage
The attached reproduces the problem via a minimal selftest, and is also fixed
by attachment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88147
--- Comment #18 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #15)
> During the bug investigation I noticed a strange thing in line-map.c:
>
>700if (line_delta < 0
>701|| (line_delta > 10
>702&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88147
--- Comment #19 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #17)
> Created attachment 45660 [details]
> Selftest coverage
>
> The attached reproduces the problem via a minimal selftest, and is also
> fixed by attachment 45653
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88147
--- Comment #20 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #19)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #17)
> > Created attachment 45660 [details]
> > Selftest coverage
> >
> > The attached reproduces the problem via a min
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88147
--- Comment #21 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Feb 12 01:09:31 2019
New Revision: 268789
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268789&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
linemap_line_start: protect against location_t overflow (PR lto/88147)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88147
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #26 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 45674
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45674&action=edit
Work-in-progress patch fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63326
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
||2019-02-12
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed on trunk and gcc-8.
It's failing this assertion:
1155 gcc_assert (can_create_pse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89036
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Feb 13 15:48:37 2019
New Revision: 268847
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268847&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++ concepts: fix ICE with requires on dtors (PR c++/89036)
PR c++/890
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88699
--- Comment #10 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Feb 13 15:48:37 2019
New Revision: 268847
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268847&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++ concepts: fix ICE with requires on dtors (PR c++/89036)
PR c++/89
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89036
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] ICE if |[8 Regression] ICE if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89283
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
The -Wattributes warning would be emitted here in cgraphunit.c:
process_function_and_variable_attributes:
777 if (lookup_attribute ("weakref", DECL_ATTRIBUTES (decl))
778 && (node->de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Both decls of "foo" are using the same FUNCTION_DECL.
node->alias is set in varasm.c: assemble_alias here:
5991cgraph_node::get_create (decl)->alias = true;
when processing the second decl of "foo"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85515
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Feb 14 22:57:34 2019
New Revision: 268908
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268908&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't offer suggestions for compiler-generated variables (PR c++/85515)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Feb 14 23:02:45 2019
New Revision: 268909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++: don't offer bogus "._0" suggestions (PR c++/86329)
PR c++/86329 r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88795
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Feb 14 23:14:56 2019
New Revision: 268915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268915&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE on class-template argument deduction (PR c++/88795)
PR c++/887
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89036
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Feb 14 23:17:51 2019
New Revision: 268916
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268916&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
C++ concepts: fix ICE with requires on dtors (PR c++/89036)
PR c++/890
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 89036, which changed state.
Bug 89036 Summary: [8 Regression] ICE if destructor has a requires
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89036
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89036
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2019-02-15
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks.
FWIW trunk (gcc 9) no longer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84916
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.0 |10.0
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88680
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Sat Feb 16 16:17:17 2019
New Revision: 268961
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=268961&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix excess warnings from -Wtype-limits with location wrappers (PR c++/8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88680
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89129
Bug 89129 depends on bug 88680, which changed state.
Bug 88680 Summary: [9 Regression] bogus -Wtype-limits for constant expressions
after r267272
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88680
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89405
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|dmalcolm at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89091
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 45774
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45774&action=edit
Patch
I came up with this patch; it survives bootstrap®rtesting, but am not sure
if it's correct.
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89410
--- Comment #10 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Jonny Grant from comment #4)
> There's another related issue, can it be covered on this ticket?
>
> GCC does not show the part of the output below I marked with after
> commenting out line 4 <-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89410
--- Comment #13 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Feb 20 20:07:20 2019
New Revision: 269050
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269050&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix ICE with #line directive (PR c/89410)
PR c/89410 reports various
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89410
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[7/8/9 Regression] ICE in |[7/8 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86395
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84889
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|9.0
||2019-02-21
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Confirmed; it's failing this assertion:
5497 /* FORNOW. Currently not supporting the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89390
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Sat Feb 23 01:19:38 2019
New Revision: 269145
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269145&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Capture source location of dtors (PR c++/89390)
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89410
--- Comment #18 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #17)
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting a test failure on master for these new tests
>
> UNRESOLVED: gcc.dg/pr89410-1.c: bad option "-1": must be -exact, -glob,
> -regexp, or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Can you attach the testcase please, rather than pasting it as a comment. I
can't reproduce the note from the example, but whitespace is significant here,
and I'm not sure roundtripping through a BZ comment h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89569
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
I don't think the word "accurate" is right here: both gcc and clang print the
wrong line number - they're just getting it wrong in different ways.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89549
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> Created attachment 45877 [details]
> test-case
Thanks; I'm able to see the behavior with that.
Assignee: ian at airs dot com
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: cmang at google dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I'm building gcc against mpfr-2.4.2.tar.bz2, which is the minimum version
stated at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/install/prerequisites.html
which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89598
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Summary|go frontend fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89598
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89598
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #5)
> This time for sure.
Indeed: r269411 did fix the build against mpfr 2.4.2 for my test config.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> David: Are you planning to send for it?
I'm not sure what you mean by this, sorry.
Component: other
Assignee: dmalcolm at redhat dot com
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
In the discussion on my GCC 9 usability blog post, reddit user "evaned" said:
> I wonder how plausible it is to cut out one of the lines in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89635
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79926
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Mar 8 22:27:08 2019
New Revision: 269515
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269515&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
i386.c: make "sorry" message more amenable to translation (PR target/79
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89635
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
evaned posted this mockup of how it could look:
https://imgur.com/tNg6qfh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89341
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #6)
> > > David: Are you planning to send for it?
> > I'm not sure what you
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87808
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
playback::context::invoke_driver builds the command line for the driver.
Does it work with each of these:
gcc_jit_context_set_bool_use_external_driver (ctxt, 1);
gcc_jit_context_set_bool_use_external_d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87808
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
You definitely need binutils for libgccjit; it calls the driver (embedded
internally in the .so by default), which invokes the assembler and linker.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87808
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|gcc_lib_dir is missing from |gcc_lib_dir is missing from
601 - 700 of 3389 matches
Mail list logo
