https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81101
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> > End-users aren't meant to see this; this is for people building GCC from
> > source, with checking enabled (the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81144
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81144
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jun 20 20:37:28 2017
New Revision: 249427
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249427&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix -Werror=class-memaccess failures in jit testsuite (PR jit/81144)
g
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks; am investigating...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81167
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
The issue is that a diagnostic is passing NULL to a %qH (which was a %qT).
%T handles NULL gracefully by printing the empty string,
whereas %H/%I fail with an assertion failure.
Happens here:
#8 0x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81167
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Minimal reproducer:
$ cat ../../src/pr81167.C
struct bar;
struct foo
{
foo () {}
foo (const bar &) {}
};
struct bar
{
operator foo() && { return foo (); }
};
void test ()
{
foo f = bar ();
}
$ ./
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81167
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Note to self: I believe the "operator T() &&" here is a user-defined conversion
from an rvalue reference to T.
We have in joust at ../../src/gcc/cp/call.c:10071
10071 tree source = source_type (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81167
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch for the ICE posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-06/msg01725.html
Actually fixing the diagnostic as per comment #5 would be a separate patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80014
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Jun 30 15:20:55 2017
New Revision: 249845
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249845&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix location of typeid() (PR c++/80014)
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80014
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79300
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Jul 6 14:17:24 2017
New Revision: 250022
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250022&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
diagnostics: fix end-points of ranges within macros (PR c++/79300)
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79300
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
The commit in comment #5 is a slightly reworked version of the candidate patch
from comment #2:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00330.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79300
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
Thanks; that seems to a slightly different issue, but we may as well keep this
bug open for tracking it.
Am investigating.
It appears to be here, within maybe_unwi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79300
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Jul 7 18:49:09 2017
New Revision: 250058
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250058&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libcpp: preserve ranges within macro expansions (PR c++/79300)
gcc/tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79300
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81269
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2017-07-12
Version|7.0 |8.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks for filing. Confirmed. Am
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
PR c/81405 identifies a crash in diagnostic-show-locus.c in the code to
consolidate fix-it hints during printing, with:
gcc.dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81405
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
I'm testing a fix for this crash in diagnostic-show-locus.c.
I've opened PR c/81432 to track the fact that the fix-its that are being
printed when the crash happens are actually nonsensical.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81432
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Jul 13 19:30:42 2017
New Revision: 250187
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250187&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
diagnostics: fix crash when consolidating out-of-order fix-it hints (PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81405
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Jul 13 19:30:42 2017
New Revision: 250187
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=250187&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
diagnostics: fix crash when consolidating out-of-order fix-it hints (PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81405
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Similar to bug 78313; am looking at a fix.
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(See also bug 78504)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Seems to resemble:
http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=1019
"0001019: strndup shouldn't require source array to be null-terminated"
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Fix would seem to be to use strnlen within xstrndup; libiberty has a strnlen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72774
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Nov 29 16:25:01 2016
New Revision: 242965
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242965&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
spellcheck bugfixes: don't offer the goal string as a suggestion
gcc/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72786
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Nov 29 16:25:01 2016
New Revision: 242965
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242965&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
spellcheck bugfixes: don't offer the goal string as a suggestion
gcc/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78313
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Nov 29 16:25:01 2016
New Revision: 242965
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242965&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
spellcheck bugfixes: don't offer the goal string as a suggestion
gcc/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77922
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Nov 29 16:25:01 2016
New Revision: 242965
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242965&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
spellcheck bugfixes: don't offer the goal string as a suggestion
gcc/c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77922
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72786
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78313
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78504
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2016-11-29
Depends on|78498 |
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
I'm able to reproduce this, based o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78169
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78169
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.black at au dot ibm.com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-11/msg02937.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 30 01:13:37 2016
New Revision: 242990
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242990&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
substring locations and # line directives (PR preprocessor/78569)
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78569
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 30 14:50:43 2016
New Revision: 243030
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243030&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libiberty: avoid reading past end of buffer in strndup/xstrndup (PR c/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78498
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Nov 30 14:54:43 2016
New Revision: 243031
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243031&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix typo in testcase name
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c/78498
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
If I'm reading things right, it looks like libiberty provides an implementation
of strndup if it's not available, but it doesn't provide a decl for it.
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks. I'm working on a patch to remove the use of strndup. Sorry for the
breakage.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Dec 2 22:39:43 2016
New Revision: 243207
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243207&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
selftest.c: remove calls to strndup (PR bootstrap/78616)
gcc/ChangeLog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
--- Comment #10 from David Malcolm ---
Build breakage should have been fixed as of r243207 (sorry again).
Should we poision strndup in system.h?
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78705
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Sorry about the breakage.
Expected:
(cinsn 1 (set (mem/v:BLK (0|scratch:DI) [0 A8])
(unspec:BLK [
(mem/v:BLK (reuse_rtx 0) [0 A8])
] UNSPEC_MEMORY_BLOCKAGE)))
Actual:
(
||2016-12-07
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Reproduced with i686-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78705
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
i386.md's define_expand "memory_blockage" has:
operands[0] = gen_rtx_MEM (BLKmode, gen_rtx_SCRATCH (Pmode));
so it's due to the difference in Pmode between i386 and x86_64.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78705
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Dec 7 01:28:13 2016
New Revision: 243332
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243332&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix x86_64-ism in selftest (PR bootstrap/78705)
In r243317 I accidenta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78705
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78680
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Dec 12 17:37:48 2016
New Revision: 243567
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243567&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix for PR preprocessor/78680
PR preprocessor/78680 identifies a crash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78680
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78656
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78213
--- Comment #11 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Dec 15 01:47:48 2016
New Revision: 243681
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243681&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Introduce selftest::locate_file
gcc/ChangeLog:
* Makefile.in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78213
--- Comment #12 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #10)
> testsuite/gcc.dg/pr78213.c often times out:
>
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pr78213.c (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gcc.dg/pr78213.c -fself-test (test for warnings,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Dec 15 18:05:05 2016
New Revision: 243721
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243721&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix use-after-free lexing unterminated raw strings (PR preprocessor/788
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78680
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Thu Dec 15 18:05:05 2016
New Revision: 243721
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=243721&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix use-after-free lexing unterminated raw strings (PR preprocessor/788
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78811
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78787
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78787
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #3)
> Created attachment 40343 [details]
> Hack to debug diagnostic-color.c
$ ./xgcc -B. -O2 -Wall -Wextra -flto /home/david/coding-3/gcc-git-clean/src/z.c
should_colo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77829
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77573
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks for filing this bug.
We already issue a warning for this within -Wall, via -Wunused-label (since
sometime at or before gcc 4.4, I think):
test.c: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70186
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-12/msg01610.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78880
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78656
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg00143.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78989
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Looking at the PRs you filed about the locations (PR78987 and PR78988), perhaps
the best approach here is for the location of the warning to be either this:
return (asan_poison_variables &&
~~~
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78989
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
...or to use a rich location to send two locations for the warning, giving:
return (asan_poison_variables &&
^~
# 6 "gimplify.cpp" 3 4
__null
-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 40461
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40461&action=edit
Reproducer, based on input.c
As noted in the thread at:
https://gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78993
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 40462
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40462&action=edit
Gimple dump from when warning is emitted
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #7 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #6)
[...]
> That should still be line 1 and column 511. Why is it line 4 and column
> 127? Something smells fishy.
Something is going wrong with the li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72803
--- Comment #8 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Sat Jan 7 21:33:59 2017
New Revision: 244199
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244199&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix linemap corruption after very wide source lines (PR c++/72803)
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72803
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
00:00:00 |2017-01-10
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78877
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg00646.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77949
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Tue Jan 10 21:54:09 2017
New Revision: 244292
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244292&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix issues with unrepresentable column numbers (PR c++/77949)
PR c++/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77949
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78877
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Wed Jan 11 17:25:40 2017
New Revision: 244325
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244325&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Offer suggestions for unrecognized sanitizer options (PR driver/78877)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78877
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Notes to self:
PRIu32 etc are described in:
http://en.cppreference.com/w/c/types/integer#Format_macro_constants
Ideal would be a fix-it hint that suggests the correct macro, but that's clealy
overambitiou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
More notes to self:
The locations within the string_concat_db for this concatenation are all
spelling locations, rather than virtual locations. The reason is that
c-lex.c's lex_string calls cpp_get_token in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304
--- Comment #6 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Jan 13 19:27:43 2017
New Revision: 244453
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244453&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't suppress bogus usage of macros from system headers in -Wformat (P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
--- Comment #13 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #12)
> Regression fixed (regression marker removed). All that's left is to poison
> strndup in system.h
Candidate patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
--- Comment #14 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Jan 16 15:03:41 2017
New Revision: 244494
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244494&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
system.h: Poison strndup (PR bootstrap/78616)
gcc/ChangeLog:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78616
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78304
--- Comment #9 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Mon Jan 16 18:08:45 2017
New Revision: 244502
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=244502&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix testcases for PR c/78304
The testcases as written made assumptions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68473
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Followup was here:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/dejagnu/2016-02/msg6.html
2016-02-15 Ben Elliston
Reported by David Malcolm.
* lib/dejagnu.exp (text): Allow angle brack
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69435
--- Comment #5 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #4)
> Followup was here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/dejagnu/2016-02/msg6.html
which is:
http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=dejagnu.git;a=commitdiff;h
1201 - 1300 of 3389 matches
Mail list logo
