-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
gcc -O1 gcc.dg/noncompile/920507-1.c
internal compiler error: in symtab_get_node, at cgraph.h:1154
(gdb) run -O1 920507-1.c
Starting program: /tmp/20140626/gcc/cc1 -O1 920507-1.c
x
Analyzing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61630
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
--- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn ---
Exceptions had been working. There is no wholesale failure of exceptions in the
G++ testsuite. I also don't know why you are defining macros for Linux and
AMD, or why you think that randomly adding linker
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
--- Comment #11 from David Edelsohn ---
I tested a corrected version of your example with both G++ 4.8.1 from Perzl.org
/ oss4aix.org and GCC trunk from a few days ago. I compiled both 32 bit
(default) and 64 bit (-maix64) and -pthread. All print
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|2014-06-28 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
--- Comment #17 from David Edelsohn ---
Is the exception throw inside the constructor?
Are saying that the linking a file with a function defined with __attribute__
(constructor) causes the failure solely because the file is linked or are you
sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||EH
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61637
--- Comment #22 from David Edelsohn ---
It is specific functionality that has not yet been implemented for 64 bit AIX.
It works for 32 bit AIX.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61746
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Enable and implement split-stack support for PowerPC Linux such that GCC
Testsuite passes with -fsplit-stack option enabled.
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-09-03
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,
||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2
||2014-09-03
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
Confirmed.
-*-*,
||powerpc*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-09-22
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,
||wschmidt at gcc dot
||2014-09-22
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
Confirmed.
,
|s390x-ibm-linux |powerpc*-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-10-02
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63435
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61981
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64-linux
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn ---
One needs to upgrade to ISL 0.14 or 0.15.
The earlier inclusion ordering of ISL header files in graphite source files
were wrong and did not follow GCC requirements. It worked on Mint and OpenSUSE
because
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr45122.c began failing on powerpc with r229902 change to
tree-vrp.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68599
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc*-*-*
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68526
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68540
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28115
--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Sun Nov 29 18:11:54 2015
New Revision: 231045
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231045&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/28115
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_adjust_cost):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28115
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
GCC 4.9 makes extensive use of aliases and AIX XCOFF semantics are different
than Linux ELF semantics. This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68609
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-*-*
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68609
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67478
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2015-12-04
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,
||segher at gcc dot gnu.org,
||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
||2015-12-04
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,
||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com,
||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63281
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
||2015-12-04
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org,
||segher at gcc dot gnu.org,
||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68609
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Sat Dec 5 12:53:45 2015
New Revision: 231317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231317&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68609
* config/rs6000/rs6000-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68609
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: powerpc*-*-*
divti3 pattern and longlong.h qrnnd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68822
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68822
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
Actually this needs support through divmodti4 pattern that falls back to
divmodtidi4 for DImode divisor.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: powerpc*-*-*
Improve performance of switch statements:
1) Heuristics for decision tree vs tablejump
2) Avoid sign extended lwa for offset
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68837
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: powerpc-ibm-aix*
The 28277.cc testcases all fail on AIX for the wchar_t case. wchar_t is 16
bits on 32 bit mode AIX and 32 bits on 64 bit AIX.
FAIL: 21_strings
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68838
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68810
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 10588, which changed state.
Bug 10588 Summary: [PPC] i==0||j==0 should use cntlzw and srawi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10588
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15524
Bug 15524 depends on bug 10588, which changed state.
Bug 10588 Summary: [PPC] i==0||j==0 should use cntlzw and srawi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10588
What|Removed |Added
---
||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68822
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61030
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
*** Bug 68822 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66764
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2015-12-22
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
Confirmed.
||2015-12-22
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
Confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48344
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
FAIL: 26_numerics/headers/cmath/48891.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libstdc++-v3/testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69294
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
FAIL: special_functions/02_assoc_legendre/check_value.cc execution test
FAIL: ext/special_functions/hyperg/check_value.cc execution test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69295
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix*
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68609
--- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Fri Jan 15 16:38:08 2016
New Revision: 232439
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232439&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68609
* config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs6000_e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68609
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Fri Jan 15 23:04:23 2016
New Revision: 232456
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232456&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68609
* gcc.target/powerpc/recip-1.c: Ad
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
r232454 broke bootstrap on AIX, which does not include TM support.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69312
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc-ibm-aix*
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69312
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
stage1 libstdc++ builds, but stage2 configure fails because conftest programs
cannot link and run due to missing ITM_xxx symbols.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68609
--- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Sat Jan 16 20:04:33 2016
New Revision: 232468
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232468&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68609
* gcc.target/powerpc/recip-6.c: E
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69312
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68753
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68609
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Wed Jan 20 19:39:08 2016
New Revision: 232632
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232632&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/68609
* config/rs6000/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68384
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69469
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69469
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
Author: dje
Date: Mon Jan 25 16:16:21 2016
New Revision: 232796
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232796&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/69469
* gcc.target/powerpc/vsx-ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68662
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn ---
Unconditionally generating toc_label_name is okay with me, but I thought that
Alan commented it was not sufficient in Comment #2.
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: libgcc
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Using the enhanced Vector integer capabilities of the POWER8 ISA provide an all
vector implementation of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65669
--- Comment #3 from Doug Evans ---
(In reply to Doug Evans from comment #2)
> I was wondering if one could just do a strip --strip-debug of globals_io.o
> in the Makefile.
This doesn't work, as is, because gdb ignores the DIE with the real type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #38
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #41 from David Edelsohn ---
Created attachment 35742
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35742&action=edit
AIX PowerPC testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
--- Comment #42 from David Edelsohn ---
Created attachment 35743
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35743&action=edit
PPC64LE Linux Testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66729
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
Is this the bootstrap failure that Segher tracked to Richard Sandiford?
Richard already posted a patch.
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
25_algorithms/remove/requirements/explicit_instantiation/2.cc:34:22: error:
'std::value_type* std::remove(std::iterator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66763
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
Created attachment 35909
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35909&action=edit
gzipped 2.ii pre-processed testcase
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: powerpc-ibm-aix*
Analyzing compilation unit
Breakpoint 1, fancy_abort(char const*, int, char const*) ()
at /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/diagnostic.c:1340
1340
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66764
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
Created attachment 35910
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35910&action=edit
gzipped pre-processed tuple.ii from libstdc++ testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: powerpc-ibm-aix*
/tmp/20150703/gcc/testsuite/gfortran5/../../gfortran
-B/tmp/20150703/gcc/testsuite/gfortran5/../../
-B/tmp/20150703/powerpc-ibm-aix7.1.0.0/./libgfortran
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
A number of PPC 405 and PPC440 target-specific nmac instruction tests began
failing on 1 July 2015.
FAIL: gcc.target/powerpc/405-nmacchw-2.c scan-assembler nmacchw.
FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66565
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
The high-level consensus at the GNU Cauldron 2015 GCC Cost Model BoF is:
1) Create gimple_costs() instead of creating potentially invalid fragments to
query rtx_costs().
2) Cost models can utilize GCC Pass
: bootstrap
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
In file included from /nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/omp-low.c:31:0:
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/gimple.h: In function 'void
gimple_call_set_fndecl(gimple, tree)'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67197
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66765
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66765
--- Comment #4 from David Edelsohn ---
This is not a target-specific bug. This has nothing to do with the target.
This is a bug where the gfortran front-end and collect2-ld do not work together
correctly. I don't know how collect2-ld can be ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66765
--- Comment #7 from David Edelsohn ---
AIX often exposes symptoms of bugs in common parts of the compiler. That does
not make the problem an AIX or target bug.
If the Fortran FE generates incorrect IR that causes an ICE in the middle end
of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66765
--- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn ---
> [Book15] f90/bug% gcc ya_sincos.c -fdump-fortran-original
> cc1: error: unrecognized command line option '-fdump-fortran-original'
This is a valid Fortran option producing an error from cc1 when passed to
||2011.05.17 14:05:46
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #25 from David Edelsohn 2011-05-17
14:05:46 UTC ---
GCC uses the AIX assembler and probably is the most heavy user of the
perimental)
<10> DW_AT_language: 4(C++)
<11> DW_AT_name: (indirect string, offset: 0x69): foo.cc
<15> DW_AT_comp_dir: (indirect string, offset: 0x0):
/home/dje/src/play
<19> DW_AT_low_pc : 0x0
<21> DW_AT_high_pc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45997
Summary: __unknown__ type name for typedef'd int
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
AssignedTo: unassig.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46311
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Hans.Boehm at hp dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn 2010-11-29 00:17:54
UTC ---
Has anyone reported this AIX assembler behavior to IBM? It would be much more
effective coming from an external customer than from me.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
--- Comment #9 from David Edelsohn 2010-11-29 22:28:20
UTC ---
If I understand correctly, the line 0 error occurs in both AIX and BFD, so it
is not a bug. Did something change in GCC that now generates line 0 debug
information?
Is the 64K limit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46655
--- Comment #12 from David Edelsohn 2010-11-30
15:43:15 UTC ---
I assume that SP6100-04-07-1036 added a bounds error check for the line number
in the assembler, which previously ignored the overflow. I don't know what AIX
as did internally (trun
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46981
Summary: multilib LD_LIBRARY_PATH prevents configuration of
target libraries
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
...@gcc.gnu.org
ReportedBy: d...@gcc.gnu.org
/tmp/20110725/./gcc/xgcc -B/tmp/20110725/./gcc/
-B/farm/dje/install/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0-20110725/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/bin/
-B/farm/dje/install/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0-20110725/powerpc-ibm-aix5.3.0.0/lib/
-isystem
/farm/dje/install/powerpc-ibm
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49841
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47947
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49841
--- Comment #3 from David Edelsohn 2011-07-25 17:27:26
UTC ---
The patch allows me to get past the failure. The current solution seems good
enough for me. Someone else can implement the alternative when it's needed.
901 - 1000 of 1701 matches
Mail list logo
