--- Additional Comments From dhruvbird at yahoo dot com 2005-04-13 12:11
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=8615)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8615&action=view)
> free_list:: static removal
>
Hi,
What has been done seems
--- Additional Comments From dhruvbird at yahoo dot com 2005-04-13 16:56
---
(In reply to comment #19)
> I want to emphasize here again one principle of C and C++: Trust the
> programmers, and allow them to do low-level tunings for performance. Or what
> is
> the purpose
--- Additional Comments From dhruvbird at yahoo dot com 2005-04-13 17:02
---
Subject: Re: __gnu_cxx::bitmap_allocator export pruning
--- bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu
> dot org 2
roduct: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dhruvbird at yahoo dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From dhruvbird at yahoo dot com 2005-02-13 18:40
---
Created an attachment (id=8190)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8190&action=view)
The files required for reproducing the bug, and a short description.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/b
--- Additional Comments From dhruvbird at yahoo dot com 2005-02-13 18:44
---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Created an attachment (id=8190)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8190&action=view)
> The files required for reproducing the bug, and a shor
