[Bug tree-optimization/54978] New: Add ability to provide vectorized functions

2012-10-18 Thread ddesics at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54978 Bug #: 54978 Summary: Add ability to provide vectorized functions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/54978] Add ability to provide vectorized functions

2012-10-19 Thread ddesics at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54978 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Davis 2012-10-19 16:14:36 UTC --- Obviously, it would be nice if gcc can build the functions if they are pure functions. But that would require somehow knowing that those functions should be built and having acc

[Bug tree-optimization/52112] New: Vectorizer fails when using CRTP

2012-02-03 Thread ddesics at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52112 Bug #: 52112 Summary: Vectorizer fails when using CRTP Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/52112] Vectorizer fails when using CRTP

2012-02-03 Thread ddesics at gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52112 --- Comment #4 from Daniel Davis 2012-02-03 18:24:49 UTC --- Any thoughts on why it won't vectorize for me on x86_64 4.6.1?

[Bug rtl-optimization/31485] C complex numbers, amd64 SSE, missed optimization opportunity

2010-04-16 Thread ddesics at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 from ddesics at gmail dot com 2010-04-17 00:28 --- Has any work been done on this enhancement? I'm using gcc 4.3.2, and I noticed that there is still limited use of SSE instructions for complex arithmetic. Unless I'm missing something in my understanding, wo