at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: darkdragon2000 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44940
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component: target
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: darkdragon2000 at hotmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Comment #2 from darkdragon2000 at hotmail dot com 2010-08-12 17:52
---
It's not a bug in the handler since when the interrupt fires at the point when
the stack pointer is invalid (right after 0x50c), the program counter gets
pushed onto the stack, which is an invalid loc
--- Comment #3 from darkdragon2000 at hotmail dot com 2010-08-12 23:56
---
Created an attachment (id=21472)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21472&action=view)
File which recreates the issue
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45264
--- Comment #4 from darkdragon2000 at hotmail dot com 2010-08-12 23:56
---
Created an attachment (id=21473)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21473&action=view)
makefile
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45264
--- Comment #6 from darkdragon2000 at hotmail dot com 2010-08-13 22:30
---
OK thanks, is the code I attached here OK? I already submitted this to Atmel
also (#605725). Last time I submitted a bug to them this is the reply I got
back:
Note that avr-gcc and avr-libC are open-source