Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: daniel.gutson at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I think that in C++1z/17, std::uncaught_exception should be marked as
[[deprecated]].
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: daniel.gutson at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The following code is contradictory, with some probability that the programmer
made is wrongly assuming something:
extern "C"
{
static int x = 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80785
--- Comment #2 from Daniel Gutson ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1)
> (In reply to Daniel Gutson from comment #0)
> > I don't see why one would want to do this.
>
> You might have a header that encloses the entire contents in an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80785
--- Comment #4 from Daniel Gutson ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> The usual reason a header has extern "C" is because it's intended for use by
> both C and C++ programs, and in that case restructuring it for the benefit
> of C
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: daniel.gutson at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
On a x86_64 linux machine, both sizeof(long double) and sizeof(__float80)
return 16, despite specifying -mlong-double-80 (x86 gcc).
Other options that did not change
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80154
--- Comment #3 from Daniel Gutson ---
Documentation is confusing:
-m96bit-long-double
-m128bit-long-double
These switches control the size of "long double" type.
...
-mlong-double-64
-mlong-double-80
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69976
--- Comment #11 from Daniel Gutson ---
Any update on this?
: preprocessor
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: daniel.gutson at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
I'm proposing to add either an __EXTENDED_TIME__ predefined macro which has the
form "HH:MM:SS.xxx" where xxx are the milliseconds, or a predef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71851
--- Comment #5 from Daniel Gutson ---
The idea is that the macro expands always to the same value.
The final usage of this facility should not be of any matter to gcc, it will be
just another program.
This macro would change break reproduceabilit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71851
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Gutson ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> > Any kind of such code goes strongly against build reproduceability,
> > -fcompare-debug etc., so not sure it woul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71851
--- Comment #8 from Daniel Gutson ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> (In reply to Daniel Gutson from comment #5)
> > This macro would change break reproduceability as much as __TIME__ does.
>
> __TIME__ is now being warned on if r
11 matches
Mail list logo
