http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin 2011-11-27
18:54:10 UTC ---
This is hack, but test doesn't fail if I interchange ldo and
.cfi_def_cfa_offset
lines:
ldo 64(%r30),%r30
.cfi_def_cfa_offset -64
How should a stack adjust in the final i
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51252
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-11-27
19:24:34 UTC ---
Similar fails:
FAIL: c-c++-common/tm/inline-asm-2.c (internal compiler error)
FAIL: c-c++-common/tm/inline-asm-2.c (test for excess errors)
FAIL: c-c++-common/tm/memcpy-1.c (inter
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51324
Bug #: 51324
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/atomic-compare-exchange-3.c (test for
excess errors)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47868
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2011-11-27
--- Comment #2 from John D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin 2011-12-01
02:08:20 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Thu Dec 1 02:08:10 2011
New Revision: 181868
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181868
Log:
PR middle-end/50283
* config/pa/pa.m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50283
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51272
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-12-01
02:37:26 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Thu Dec 1 02:37:06 2011
New Revision: 181870
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=181870
Log:
PR other/51272
* config/pa/stublib.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51272
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51307
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47868
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2011-12-09
02:26:52 UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51220
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2011-12-09
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin 2011-12-09
15:42:58 UTC ---
FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/20090116 c_lto_20090116_0.o-c_lto_20090116_0.o link, -O1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51546
Bug #: 51546
Summary: [4.7 Regression] error: fallthru to exit from bb 2
compiling libstdc++-v3/src/strstream.cc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51603
Bug #: 51603
Summary: ERROR: g++.dg/cpp0x/rv-cast[34].C: syntax error in
target selector "target c++11"
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Statu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51529
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616
Bug #: 51616
Summary: [4.7 Regression] gfortran.dg/quad_2.f90 fails on
hppa*-*-hpux*
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2011-12-19
01:45:16 UTC ---
Possibly, you referred to the wrong PR. PR 51057 is about the precision
of IBM long double.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19185
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51645
Bug #: 51645
Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/cpp0x/alias-decl-debug-0.C (test for
excess errors)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51252
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin 2011-12-23
01:53:20 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Fri Dec 23 01:53:13 2011
New Revision: 182646
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182646
Log:
PR middle-end/51252
* config/pa/pa.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51252
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin 2011-12-23
02:03:03 UTC ---
Fixed on PA.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin 2011-12-23
02:11:03 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Fri Dec 23 02:10:52 2011
New Revision: 182647
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182647
Log:
PR testsuite/50722
gcc.dg/pr49994-3.c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50722
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51703
Bug #: 51703
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/io_real_boz_[345].f90 -O (test for
excess errors)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51616
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin 2011-12-30
15:40:59 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> hpux11 appears to be yet another OS that has sufficient quad
> support that gfortran detects a REAL(16) type, but the OS
> lacks the basic libm functions
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51715
Bug #: 51715
Summary: FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-13.c execution test
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51717
Bug #: 51717
Summary: FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-14.c (test for excess
errors)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51715
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2011-12-30
16:06:33 UTC ---
This test also to be skipped 32-bit hpux as secondary symbols
are not overridden.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24296
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51703
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51603
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51715
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2012-01-07
15:27:22 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Jan 7 15:27:15 2012
New Revision: 182981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182981
Log:
PR gcov-profile/51715
PR gcov-profile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51717
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2012-01-07
15:27:22 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Jan 7 15:27:15 2012
New Revision: 182981
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182981
Log:
PR gcov-profile/51715
PR gcov-profile
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51717
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51715
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2012-01-11 00:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin 2012-01-14
04:54:23 UTC ---
This is a binutils bug. Single word conversions need to
use the 0E opcode rather than the 0C opcode that's currently
generated for fcnv,t,sgl,uwd.
This doesn't fail for PA1.1 bec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin 2012-01-14
21:17:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> This is a binutils bug. Single word conversions need to
> use the 0E opcode rather than the 0C opcode that's currently
> generated for fcnv,t,sgl,uwd.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22473
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51871
Bug #: 51871
Summary: [4.7 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.c-torture/execute/20010122-1.c execution
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51875
Bug #: 51875
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/guality/pr41558.f90 -O0 line 7 s
== 'foo'
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51871
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |target
Summary|[4.7 Regres
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51011
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
Bug #: 51967
Summary: FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/48362.cc
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51967
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin 2012-01-23
15:20:35 UTC ---
Similar fail is libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple.cc:
Executing on host: /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/g++ -shared-libgcc
-B/test/gnu/gcc
/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/test/gnu/gcc/objd
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51934
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52002
Bug #: 52002
Summary: [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap fails at revision 183520 in
stage1
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52002
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51985
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52021
Bug #: 52021
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/typebound_proc_25.f90 -O (internal
compiler error)
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51871
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin 2012-01-28
18:48:16 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sat Jan 28 18:48:11 2012
New Revision: 183669
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183669
Log:
PR target/51871
* config/pa/pa.c (pa_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51871
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52021
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51875
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin 2012-01-29
23:56:44 UTC ---
Author: danglin
Date: Sun Jan 29 23:56:38 2012
New Revision: 183688
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183688
Log:
PR testsuite/51875
* gfortran.dg/gual
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46057
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44581
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Component|target
Priority: P3
Component: d
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Build: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
spawn
Priority: P3
Component: d
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Build: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
spawn /test/gnu/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69788
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88777
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
Assignee: ibuclaw at gdcproject dot org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
Target: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
Build: hppa-unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79540
--- Comment #15 from John David Anglin ---
print '(f2.1)',100.00
end
causes a stack overflow in memcpy:
(gdb) bt
Python Exception Failed to load
/home/gnu/lib/python2.7/lib-dynload/itertools.sl:
#0 0xc01cf85c in memcpy () from /usr/li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35608
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Version: 8.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa-unknown-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85360
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Build: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
spawn /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/gcc/xgcc -B
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84941
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Build: hppa2.0w-hp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85672
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
The config file looks like this:
/* Define if __float128 is supported on this host. */
# define _GLIBCXX_USE_FLOAT128 0
#if !defined(__FLOAT128__) && !defined(__SIZEOF_FLOAT128__)
#undef _GLIBCXX_USE_FLO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87256
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin ---
This patch improves things by about a factor 4:
Index: expmed.h
===
--- expmed.h(revision 27)
+++ expmed.h(working copy)
@@ -1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87256
--- Comment #11 from John David Anglin ---
I tend to think there may be an issue with costs. There is no pattern
for muldi3 on 32-bit hppa, so we use the generic code from libgcc. How
do we know the cost for this routine?
If synth_mult is disa
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Build: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
/te
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87100
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2019-03-10 00:00:00 |2019-7-31
CC|
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87100
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90597
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 46667
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46667&action=edit
Preproccessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90597
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
/* However, if the underlying mode requires a bigger alignment than
what the target hook provides, we cannot use the mode. For now,
simply reject that case. */
gcc_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90597
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2019-8-3
--- Comment #3 from John Da
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: deller at gmx dot de, svens at stackframe dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91347
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
The uses on the call insn seem okay (i.e., they have mem:BLK for spec):
(call_insn/j 53 52 0 5 (parallel [
(set (reg:SI 28 %r28)
(call (mem:SI (symbol_ref/v:SI ("@number") [fl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90597
--- Comment #6 from John David Anglin ---
I suppose an assert could be generated to avoid running the test on hppa64,
but this is a compiler ICE and the error shouldn't occur.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91347
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91347
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
I see in dse.c:
/* Get arguments passed to CALL_INSN. Return TRUE if successful.
So far it only handles arguments passed in registers. */
static bool
get_call_args (rtx call_insn, tree fn, rtx *arg
arget)"
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ipa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.or
Priority: P3
Component: testsuite
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Build: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
spawn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91448
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
I also see the following fails:
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-4.C -std=gnu++98 (test for warnings, line 25)
FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-4.C -std=gnu++98 (test for excess errors)
FAIL: g++.dg/war
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11
Build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91457
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Martin Sebor wrote on 2019-08-14:
I don't know about the flifetime-dse2.C test but the Warray-bounds-4.C warning
is the result of a recent enhancement to the strlen optimization, either
r274486 or r27378
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91448
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
Discussion on excess errors for g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-4.C move to Bug
91457:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91457
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91347
--- Comment #10 from John David Anglin ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #6)
> This looks similar to PR target/55023.
Yes. Looking at how scan_insn() evolved since PR target/55023, it is
clear why this is a regression.
Priority: P3
Component: lto
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91478
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
See PR lto/83452:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83452
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91478
--- Comment #5 from John David Anglin ---
Previously, we had in pr41893-1.o.debug.temp.o:
w gnu_lto_v1
w gnu_lto_v1
w gnu_lto_v1
w gnu_lto_v1
W pr41893_1.c.ebbf0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91448
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa*-*-hpux11.11
Host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91478
--- Comment #15 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 46747
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46747&action=edit
ld symbol resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91478
--- Comment #17 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 46754
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46754&action=edit
.o file from step 1
501 - 600 of 2296 matches
Mail list logo
