https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Similar fails:
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-30.c gcov: 0 failures in line counts, 0 in branch
percentages, 0 in condition/decision, 12 in prime-paths, 0 in return
percentages, 0 in intermediate format, 0 fa
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Build: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Created attachment 61284
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120084
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
This changes test to unsupported on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Build: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir64/gcc/xgcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120082
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 61280
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61280&action=edit
Preprocessed source.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120082
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 61281
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61281&action=edit
Assembler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116986
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
spawn -ignore SIGHUP /home/dave/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/xg++ -shared-libgcc
-B/home
/dave
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
Maybe introduced by the following change:
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=ad2908ed4ec5eff3cad3fd142cde5c1fac4788e9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Don't know. It's defined in generic code. All the initializers
seem to have an extra set of `{}`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089
--- Comment #8 from John David Anglin ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #5)
> Isn't this a glibc change, and you need to regenerate the gcc fixincludes
> headers after updating glibc?
That could have happened. Will investigate.
Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089
--- Comment #13 from John David Anglin ---
Debian doesn't ship fixed pthread.h but they are in my personal
builds. I will probably remove fixed pthread.h from my personal
builds.
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Target: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Build: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117645
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8)
>> > The current implementation of addti3 on hppa only allows register
> > operands. The problem is avoided if we improve addti3 to support
> > the addition o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119220
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 60748
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60748&action=edit
Patch
Your suggestion works.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119089
--- Comment #9 from John David Anglin ---
The PTHREAD_COND_INITIALIZER initializer changed in glibc 2.41.
In addition to regenerating the gcc fixincludes, I believe gcc needs
rebuilding as the initializer is used in gthr.h.
Debian doesn't ship
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118762
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 60931
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=60931&action=edit
Assembler output
Looks like check should be xfailed on 64-bit hppa-hpux.
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: hppa64-hp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #12 from John David Anglin ---
With patch, gcov-29 now passes. But gcov-30 fails with excess errors
FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/gcov-30.c (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
/home/dave/gnu/gcc/gcc/gcc/testsuite/gcc.misc-tests/gcov-30.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #16 from John David Anglin ---
Your patch works for me:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-testresults/2025-May/846366.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #14 from John David Anglin ---
(In reply to Jørgen Kvalsvik from comment #13)
> (In reply to John David Anglin from comment #12)
> > With patch, gcov-29 now passes. But gcov-30 fails with excess errors
> >
> > FAIL: gcc.misc-tests/
NCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 61402
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61402&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #20 from John David Anglin ---
(In reply to John David Anglin from comment #19)
> It's not clear why gcov-30 passes on Linux. I searched the entire tree and
> couldn't find how TARGET_HAVE_LIBATOMIC gets set on Linux. Also, always
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #19 from John David Anglin ---
(In reply to Jørgen Kvalsvik from comment #18)
> Ok, thanks, I pushed a fix for the gcov %zu prints, at least for gcov.
Thanks.
> To recap:
>
> * gcov-pr86536.c sporadically fails? (which has to be u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120186
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
Hi Adrian,
I haven't tested LRA in sometime. There are are at least two bugs
preventing migration to LRA on hppa, although they didn't previously
break bootstrap. I don't believe these are problems wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120186
--- Comment #4 from John David Anglin ---
My last LRA build was at r15-9116-g28751389a68.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120186
--- Comment #7 from John David Anglin ---
I don't think I've ever done a LRA build with selftests enabled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120086
--- Comment #22 from John David Anglin ---
I was about to install a similar patch for hppa-hpux.
I think the builtin falls back to emitting sync libcalls when enabled or calls
to libatomic. Not sure whether the atomic support detection could b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114065
--- Comment #41 from John David Anglin ---
*** Bug 119698 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119698
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #20 from John
||2025-05-11
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
Also see this on hppa64-hp-hpux11.11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99832
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
2301 - 2333 of 2333 matches
Mail list logo
