[Bug target/32313] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure running gengtype in stage 2.

2007-06-19 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-19 16:43 --- The second time is the charm. There are still regressions caused by the dataflow merge, but at least we can bootstrap now. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug target/32406] New: [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in nestfunc-6.c at -O3

2007-06-19 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
ONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu GC

[Bug target/32406] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in nestfunc-6.c at -O3

2007-06-20 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-20 07:11 --- Created an attachment (id=13739) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13739&action=view) First patch attempt. I think this patch fixes this bug. The test case looks better from my cross-compi

[Bug target/32437] New: [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c

2007-06-20 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: mipsel

[Bug target/32437] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c

2007-06-21 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 09:15 --- Created an attachment (id=13754) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13754&action=view) Proposed patch. This is a problem with __builtin_eh_return(). At -O0 the new return address is being st

[Bug target/32437] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c

2007-06-21 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-21 20:52 --- I haven't yet looked in detail at the RTL dumps, but in the assembly output the store of the new return value was missing. It didn't seem to be in the wrong place, but missing entirely. I just hacked up th

[Bug fortran/32046] [4.3 Regression] wrong code with -O2 for gfortran.dg/interface_12.f90 & result_in_spec_1.f90

2007-06-21 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-22 04:46 --- Subject: Bug 32046 Author: daney Date: Fri Jun 22 04:46:08 2007 New Revision: 125941 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=125941 Log: PR target/32046 * config/mips

[Bug target/32406] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in nestfunc-6.c at -O3

2007-06-21 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-22 04:55 --- Fixed by this patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=rev&revision=125941 Unfortunately I botched the PR number in the ChangeLog with my first commit, so the magic patch description did not show up

[Bug target/32437] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c

2007-06-22 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-22 08:38 --- Looking at the rtl dumps of unwind-dw2.c compiled with -O1 I find: In unwind-dw2.c.135r.subreg (_Unwind_Resume): . . . (insn 72 71 73 6 ../../../trunk/libgcc/../gcc/unwind.inc:216 (parallel [ (unspec

[Bug target/32437] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c

2007-06-23 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-23 16:47 --- Thanks for the patch. I just started a mipsel-linux bootstrap. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32437

[Bug target/32437] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c

2007-06-26 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #15 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-06-26 17:14 --- mipsel-linux test results are here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-06/msg01158.html The offending gcc.dg/cleanup-[8|9|10|11].c tests now pass as do almost all C++ and libstdc++ tests. -- daney at

[Bug tree-optimization/32653] New: [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure with excessive memory consumption in tree-ssa-pre compiling libjava/interperter.c

2007-07-06 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: build Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu GC

[Bug java/24127] New: ICE in libjava.compile/PR6865.java reported as "PASS" in testsuite.

2005-09-29 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: java AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc d

[Bug testsuite/24128] New: ICE in libjava.compile/PR6865.java reported as "PASS" in testsuite.

2005-09-29 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24128

[Bug java/24242] New: Redundant null pointer checks generated on refrerences returned by new operator.

2005-10-06 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: java AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux

[Bug tree-optimization/20398] ICE compiling mauve's gnu/testlet/java/io/RandomAccessFile/jdk11.java

2005-07-25 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-07-25 21:08 --- This version of gcc seems to work: $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 4.1.0 20050725 (experimental) So it looks like someone fixed the problem. -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/42164] mm/rmap.c:860:1: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5138

2009-11-24 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-11-25 01:10 --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > Can you provide the preprocessed source? > > > > Sorry, the preprocessed source is too big, I can not paste it as comment, > where >

[Bug target/42164] mm/rmap.c:860:1: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5138

2009-11-30 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-01 07:26 --- Created an attachment (id=19193) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19193&action=view) Reduced testcase Configured as: ../trunk/configure --target=mips64-linux --with-sysroot=/home/daney/mips6

[Bug target/42164] mm/rmap.c:860:1: internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5138

2009-11-30 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 Last

[Bug target/42164] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5138

2009-12-01 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.5.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42164

[Bug target/42164] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5138

2009-12-01 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-02 00:18 --- Created an attachment (id=19203) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19203&action=view) More reduced testcase. A more reduced testcase. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:

[Bug target/42164] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5138

2009-12-01 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-02 00:21 --- Created an attachment (id=19204) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19204&action=view) A possible patch. This patch allows me to build the kernel without ICEing, but the resulting image w

[Bug target/42164] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5138

2009-12-01 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-02 01:38 --- Created an attachment (id=19206) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19206&action=view) A Patch that seems to actually work. The first patch was bogus. This patch actually works. I will

[Bug rtl-optimization/42164] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5138

2009-12-04 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-04 17:46 --- Subject: Bug 42164 Author: daney Date: Fri Dec 4 17:46:23 2009 New Revision: 154987 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=154987 Log: 2009-12-04 David Daney PR rtl-optimizati

[Bug rtl-optimization/42164] [4.5 Regression] internal compiler error: in simplify_subreg, at simplify-rtx.c:5138

2009-12-04 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #13 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-04 18:20 --- Fixed by the patch. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug testsuite/42313] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/builtin-unreachable.c scan-assembler-not %e[bs]p on i686 darwin

2009-12-07 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-07 17:27 --- It is failing because the redundant stack pointer adjustments are not being removed. This test is passing for me on i686-pc-linux-gnu at r154987, so I think it must be darwin specific. If for some reason darwin

[Bug testsuite/42313] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/builtin-unreachable.c scan-assembler-not %e[bs]p on i686 darwin

2009-12-08 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-12-08 17:34 --- (In reply to comment #4) > Mike Stump says that the frame can be optimized away on darwin. However, > Apple's 4.2.1 compiler in darwin10 also appears to leave the stack frame... That compiler doesn&

[Bug target/42661] New: Documented -mmad option not accepted.

2010-01-08 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mips64-unknown-linux GCC host triplet: mips64-unknown-linux GCC target triplet: mips64-unknown-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42661

[Bug target/42839] New: gcc.target/mips/octeon-bbit-2.c failing for -mabi=64

2010-01-21 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
iority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: *-*-* GCC host triplet: *-*-* GCC target triplet: mips64-unknown-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42839

[Bug target/42839] [4.5 Regression] gcc.target/mips/octeon-bbit-2.c failing for -mabi=64

2010-01-21 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.5.0 Known to work||4.4.3

[Bug target/33895] mips.c:6868: error: 'mips_output_dwarf_dtprel' defined but not used

2007-10-27 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-27 18:04 --- >From my O2: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-10/msg01186.html Please update and try again. Use contrib/gcc_update so that the svn version number is put into the version information. -- h

[Bug tree-optimization/32653] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure with excessive memory consumption in tree-ssa-pre compiling libjava/interperter.c

2007-11-05 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-05 17:34 --- As of r129803, I can bootstrap c,c++,java on my mipsel-linux build machine with 128MB RAM again. Although some files require more than 128MB of virtual memory, I have plenty of swap and the system does not thrash so

[Bug bootstrap/34007] [4.3 Regression] "Error: Branch out of range" compiling fold-const.c in stage 1

2007-11-06 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-06 17:08 --- Perhaps your bootstrap compiler is faulty. It would seem that no code from the compiler-being-built is run at this point. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34007

[Bug bootstrap/34007] [4.3 Regression] "Error: Branch out of range" compiling fold-const.c in stage 1

2007-11-06 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-06 17:17 --- This is my last known good mips-linux-gnu build: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2007-10/msg01186.html On mipsel-linux-gnu I am bootstrapping almost daily without problems. Also last night (with an current

[Bug target/34007] [4.2 Regression] "Error: Branch out of range" compiling fold-const.c in stage 1

2007-11-06 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|4.2.3 |4.2.1 Target Milestone|--- |4.2.3

[Bug tree-optimization/32653] [4.3 Regression] Bootstrap failure with excessive memory consumption in tree-ssa-pre compiling libjava/interperter.c

2007-11-07 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-07 18:59 --- We no longer regress with respect to this testcase (bootstrapping on my small mipsel-linux system). -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/34062] New: [4.3 Regression] MIPS n32 fails gcc.c-torture/execute/nestfunc-6.c

2007-11-10 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mips64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: mips64-unknown

[Bug target/34062] [4.3 Regression] MIPS n32 fails gcc.c-torture/execute/nestfunc-6.c

2007-11-10 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.3.0 Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http

[Bug fortran/32046] [4.3 Regression] wrong code with -O2 for gfortran.dg/interface_12.f90 & result_in_spec_1.f90

2007-11-10 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-11 06:25 --- Well obviously my commit attributed to this bug mentioned the wrong bug number. I wonder if I can find the proper bug... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32046

[Bug target/32406] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in nestfunc-6.c at -O3

2007-11-10 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-11 06:29 --- *** Bug 34062 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32406

[Bug target/34062] [4.3 Regression] MIPS n32 fails gcc.c-torture/execute/nestfunc-6.c

2007-11-10 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-11 06:29 --- The problem is that $gp is clobbered at the nonlocal_goto_receiver but it is not being restored. Currently the nonlocal_goto_receiver has a condition of TARGET_CALL_CLOBBERED_GP, but this is not correct. I think it

[Bug target/32406] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in nestfunc-6.c at -O3

2007-11-10 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-11 06:32 --- Well the fix only works for o32. As noted in PR 34062, n32 is broken. I would guess n64 as well. I will take another try at fixing it. Perhaps the second attempt will work out a little better than the first

[Bug target/32406] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in nestfunc-6.c at -O3

2007-11-10 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever Confirmed|0 |1 GCC build

[Bug target/32406] [4.3 Regression] MIPS: FAIL in nestfunc-6.c at -O3

2007-11-10 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-11 07:05 --- Created an attachment (id=14528) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14528&action=view) Proposed patch second half. Completely untested patch. It will probably take me a couple of weeks to

[Bug target/34281] New: [arm] varargs broken with 64bit parameters.

2007-11-28 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
Summary: [arm] varargs broken with 64bit parameters. Product: gcc Version: 4.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org Re

[Bug target/34409] New: MIPS: Non-optimal DWARF frame data

2007-12-09 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
t org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC target triplet: mips*-*-linux* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34409

[Bug target/34415] [4.3 Regression] Possible miscompilation on MIPS

2007-12-09 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-10 05:15 --- Perhaps we could get a URL to a version of mawk that is failing. Also details about how you configured gcc and which svn revision number you tested, and how mawk was configured. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug rtl-optimization/34415] [4.3 Regression] Possible miscompilation on MIPS

2007-12-11 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.3.0 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34415

[Bug target/34281] [4.3 Regression] ARM: varargs broken with 64bit parameters.

2007-12-11 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-11 23:20 --- Verified that it works on MontaVista build 3.4.3. Still failing on: armv5tl-montavista-linuxeabi-g++ (GCC) 4.3.0 20071211 (experimental) [trunk revision 130777] -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed

[Bug bootstrap/34144] [4.3 Regression] Revision 130005 causes bootstrap failure with --disable-checking

2007-12-12 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 01:12 --- Andrew proposed a patch (which was then approved) here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-11/msg01511.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34144

[Bug bootstrap/34144] [4.3 Regression] Revision 130005 causes bootstrap failure with --disable-checking

2007-12-12 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 05:28 --- Currently testing on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. I will commit if all OK. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/34144] [4.3 Regression] Revision 130005 causes bootstrap failure with --disable-checking

2007-12-13 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 19:19 --- Subject: Bug 34144 Author: daney Date: Thu Dec 13 19:19:17 2007 New Revision: 130908 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=130908 Log: 2007-12-13 Andrew Pinski <[EMAI

[Bug bootstrap/34144] [4.3 Regression] Revision 130005 causes bootstrap failure with --disable-checking

2007-12-13 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 19:32 --- Fixed by the patch. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/34456] MIPS: Flaw in branch delay optimization (patch included).

2007-12-13 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-14 07:36 --- Kaz: A test case would be useful. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/36252] New: OutOfMemoryError on simple text conversion.

2008-05-16 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
testing a patch -- Summary: OutOfMemoryError on simple text conversion. Product: gcc Version: 4.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy:

[Bug libgcj/36252] OutOfMemoryError on simple text conversion.

2008-05-20 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-21 03:49 --- Subject: Bug 36252 Author: daney Date: Wed May 21 03:49:03 2008 New Revision: 135705 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135705 Log: 2008-05-20 David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug libgcj/36252] OutOfMemoryError on simple text conversion.

2008-05-20 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-21 03:58 --- Subject: Bug 36252 Author: daney Date: Wed May 21 03:57:38 2008 New Revision: 135706 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=135706 Log: 2008-05-20 David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[Bug libgcj/36252] OutOfMemoryError on simple text conversion.

2008-05-20 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-05-21 04:00 --- Fixed in 4.3.1 and trunk. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/25816] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Configure detects TLS, but glibc does not support it.

2006-01-23 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2006-01-17 13:24:17 |2006-01-24 06

[Bug libgcj/25816] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Configure detects TLS, but glibc does not support it.

2006-01-24 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 00:11 --- Subject: Bug 25816 Author: daney Date: Wed Jan 25 00:11:41 2006 New Revision: 110190 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110190 Log: PR java/25816 * configure.ac (enable_t

[Bug libgcj/25816] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Configure detects TLS, but glibc does not support it.

2006-01-24 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 00:42 --- Subject: Bug 25816 Author: daney Date: Wed Jan 25 00:42:17 2006 New Revision: 110199 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=110199 Log: PR java/25816 * configure.ac (enable_t

[Bug libgcj/25816] [4.1/4.2 Regression] Configure detects TLS, but glibc does not support it.

2006-01-24 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-25 00:47 --- Fixed now. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug java/26007] initialized final static data should go in .rodata, not .data

2006-01-31 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-01-31 17:31 --- If you fix this, you need to also make sure the Method.set* never modifies the data under any circumstances. Attempts at modification will result in SIGSEGV which is usually converted to NPE. The real exception

[Bug libgcj/26487] Weird handling of HTTP Headers

2006-02-28 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #7 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-28 16:54 --- It is broken. I am looking at it now. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/26487] Weird handling of HTTP Headers

2006-02-28 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-02-28 22:05 --- Proposed patch is here: http://developer.classpath.org/pipermail/classpath-patches/2006-February/000708.html -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/26487] Weird handling of HTTP Headers

2006-03-03 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #12 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-03 23:24 --- Fixed by this patch to GNU classpath: 2006-03-03 David Daney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * gnu/java/net/protocol/http/HTTPURLConnection.java (getRequestProperties): Rewrote. (addRequestProperty): R

[Bug classpath/26487] Weird handling of HTTP Headers

2006-03-03 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Component|libgcj |classpath Product|gcc |classpath

[Bug libgcj/26073] [4.2 regression] libjava fails to compile

2006-03-07 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-07 18:29 --- Should be fixed by the patch I just committed. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/26858] New: NullPointerException not generated for large classes...

2006-03-24 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
large classes... Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686

[Bug libgcj/26860] New: NullPointerException not generated for large classes...

2006-03-24 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
large classes... Product: gcc Version: 4.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686

[Bug libgcj/26860] NullPointerException not generated for large classes...

2006-03-24 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-25 01:56 --- Due to a slip of the fingers, I created a duplicate entry. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 26858 *** -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/26858] NullPointerException not generated for large classes...

2006-03-24 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-25 01:56 --- *** Bug 26860 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858

[Bug libgcj/26858] NullPointerException not generated for large classes...

2006-03-24 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-25 01:57 --- The testcase has been committed to the libgcj testsuite as testsuite/libjava.lang/PR26858.java -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26858

[Bug libgcj/26861] New: VirtualMachineError in interperter.

2006-03-24 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
ot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26861

[Bug java/21115] false boolean argument passed from pre-compiled to interpreted method is true

2005-04-19 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-19 22:55 --- Replacing Test.java with this seems to work: import java.lang.reflect.*; public abstract class Test { public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception { Class c = Class.forName("I

[Bug libgcj/18220] Test case libjava.lang/Process_3 does not end if "sed" not available

2005-05-17 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |daney at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug libgcj/18266] SIGSEGV in GC_register_finalizer_inner ()

2005-05-17 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |daney at gcc dot gnu dot org |dot org | Status|NEW

[Bug libgcj/18893] null pointer exception in the Logger.getCallerStackFrame()

2005-05-17 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18893

[Bug libgcj/18220] Test case libjava.lang/Process_3 does not end if "sed" not available

2005-05-17 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 01:05 --- libjava.lang/Process_3.java should now fail if 'sed' is not available. -- What|Removed

[Bug libgcj/21714] [4.0/4.1 Regression] libjava bootstrap failure in java/lang/natConcreteProcess.cc

2005-05-23 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-23 15:47 --- I don't think we should revert it as Process et al. were broken on many pthread targets before the patch. Since NetBSD is not posix, perhaps it should not be using PosixProcess. I am not a BSD hacker

[Bug libgcj/21869] New: We should to use StringBuilder instead of StringBuffer where appropriate.

2005-06-01 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
where appropriate. Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P2 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug target/19683] New: MIPS wrong-code for 64-bit multiply from java program.

2005-01-28 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build

[Bug target/19683] MIPS wrong-code for 64-bit multiply from java program.

2005-01-28 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29 01:00 --- Created an attachment (id=8096) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8096&action=view) Testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19683

[Bug target/19683] MIPS wrong-code for 64-bit multiply from java program.

2005-01-28 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29 01:16 --- I should probably add the the compiler was configured with: configure --target=mipsel-linux --with-sysroot=/usr/local/mipsel-linux --with-arch=mips32 --with-float=soft --enable-languages=c,c++,java --prefix

[Bug middle-end/29519] [4.2 Regression] Bad code on MIPS with -fnon-call-exceptions

2006-10-21 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #6 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-22 04:11 --- Created an attachment (id=12474) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12474&action=view) Potential fix. As per Richard's analysis, I am testing this patch. It seems to fix the testc

[Bug middle-end/29519] [4.2 Regression] Bad code on MIPS with -fnon-call-exceptions

2006-10-23 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #8 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-23 15:00 --- The patch is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-10/msg01149.html -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/29519] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Bad code on MIPS with -fnon-call-exceptions

2006-10-24 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #9 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-25 05:49 --- Subject: Bug 29519 Author: daney Date: Wed Oct 25 05:49:43 2006 New Revision: 118023 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118023 Log: PR middle-end/29519 * r

[Bug middle-end/29519] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Bad code on MIPS with -fnon-call-exceptions

2006-10-25 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #10 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-25 22:29 --- Subject: Bug 29519 Author: daney Date: Wed Oct 25 22:29:10 2006 New Revision: 118044 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=118044 Log: PR middle-end/29519 * r

[Bug middle-end/29519] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Bad code on MIPS with -fnon-call-exceptions

2006-10-25 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #11 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-25 22:34 --- With the (now committed) patches, my testing shows the problem as fixed. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug libgcj/29604] New: Race condition in ServerSocket.accept()

2006-10-26 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: *-*-* GCC host triplet: *-*-* GCC target triplet: *-*-* http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug libgcj/29604] Race condition in ServerSocket.accept()

2006-10-26 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-26 17:21 --- As noted in Comment #11 of PR15430, I think that all accesses to native_fd need to be synchronized. That is my plan of attack for this. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed

[Bug libgcj/29604] Race condition in ServerSocket.accept()

2006-10-26 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-26 17:56 --- This is trickier than I initially thought. You cannot remained blocked in accept() while holding a lock that protects closing the native_fd. Otherwise you will be blocked until a connection arrives (perhaps forever

[Bug c++/29721] New: Wrong code when compiling libjava/verify.cc at -O2

2006-11-04 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: mipsel-linux-gnu http://g

[Bug c++/29721] Wrong code when compiling libjava/verify.cc at -O2

2006-11-04 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-05 07:10 --- I guess I should note that i686 does not seem suffer from this bug. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29721

[Bug target/29721] Wrong code when compiling libjava/verify.cc at -O2

2006-11-05 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #2 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-05 21:44 --- It looks like the problem here is that a %lo relocation is getting seperated from its corresponding %got. Here is a little of the assembly, note how there is an intervening %got/%lo between the %got($L2406) and the

[Bug target/29721] Wrong code when compiling libjava/verify.cc at -O2

2006-11-05 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #3 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 01:17 --- Manually moving the lw $4,%got($L2406)($28) to be just before the addiu $4,$4,%lo($L2406) and reassembling fixes the problem. So I think that my analysis about the problem being splitting them up

[Bug target/29721] Wrong code when compiling libjava/verify.cc at -O2

2006-11-06 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #4 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-06 22:31 --- OK, looks like GCC may be allowed to emit the relocations out of order. I am looking into the possiblility that gas can be fixed so that the relocaitons are emitted in the proper order even if their position in the

[Bug target/29721] Wrong code when compiling libjava/verify.cc at -O2

2006-11-07 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #5 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-07 20:53 --- This is a gas bug. This is probably the fix: http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-11/msg00055.html -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/29805] New: Wrong code compiling java/typeck.c

2006-11-11 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
nu dot org ReportedBy: daney at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29805

[Bug java/29805] Wrong code compiling java/typeck.c

2006-11-11 Thread daney at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Comment #1 from daney at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-11-11 23:00 --- Looks like an array overflow. Not wrong code. I am testing a patch. -- daney at gcc dot gnu dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

<    1   2   3   4   >