--- Additional Comments From dalej at apple dot com 2005-02-17 01:45
---
Please ignore comment #3, I had the bug number wrong.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18109
apple dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i686-linux-pc-gnu
GCC host triplet: i686-linux-pc-gnu
GCC target triplet: i686-linux-pc-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20581
--- Additional Comments From dalej at apple dot com 2005-03-21 21:49
---
The following is a slightly modified version of g++.dg/eh/omit-frame-pointer2.C.
It fails with -O -fomit-frame-pointer -mno-accumulate-outgoing-args -fpic (you
need all flags). Basic problem is that there are 24
--- Additional Comments From dalej at apple dot com 2005-03-21 21:54
---
(fails similarly on Darwin x86, if anyone cares)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20581
P2
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dalej at apple dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: same
GCC host triplet: powerpc-apple-darwin8.0.0.b3
GCC target triplet: same
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19650
--- Additional Comments From dalej at apple dot com 2005-01-27 01:21
---
OK, thanks, I'll go fix it. I mostly put it in here in case somebody was
working on a dup.
--
What|Removed |
--- Additional Comments From dalej at apple dot com 2005-01-31 18:27
---
Fixed by patch above.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From dalej at apple dot com 2005-02-02 18:19
---
Actually I adjusted the doc to my satisfaction in this thread:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-10/msg01048.html
I suppose it's OK to close now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17884
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: dalej at apple dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: powerpc
--- Additional Comments From dalej at apple dot com 2004-10-12 18:30 ---
OK, thanks. From this it appears that the only effect of 'asm volatile' that users
can safely rely on is that such an instruction will not be deleted. If this is
agreeable to everybody, I will
--- Additional Comments From dalej at apple dot com 2004-11-04 23:31 ---
It does say that, and I expect cases can be constructed where the comment is true, but
it is not
completely right. When you replace 2 copies of code with 1 copy you are generally
making it
smaller. Plus, there
--- Comment #4 from dalej at apple dot com 2007-01-12 20:13 ---
With pic, the load of the global's address is pulled outside the loop, so the
"base" is a register rather than the global. This causes ivopts to represent
index*step all in the index field rather than
--- Comment #6 from dalej at apple dot com 2007-01-13 01:32 ---
Stuff in --tool_opts from RUNTESTFLAGS goes before the dg-options on the
command line, I just tried it. Is there some other way to do it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25443
--- Comment #8 from dalej at apple dot com 2007-01-15 23:41 ---
You are right, thanks. Test case fixed thus in mainline (to be 4.3).
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-01/msg01266.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25443
--- Comment #9 from dalej at apple dot com 2007-01-15 23:48 ---
as per previous comment
--
dalej at apple dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
15 matches
Mail list logo
