https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77781
Robert Haberlach changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||colu...@gmx-topmail.de
--- Comment
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
template
struct X {
template
struct Y {
Y(U, Ts const&... );
};
friend void begin(X) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84692
--- Comment #1 from Robert Haberlach ---
Btw. begin being a friend is irrelevant, it can also be a non-static or static
member.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84692
--- Comment #2 from Robert Haberlach ---
And furthermore, I forgot to paste the correct compiler output, as the above
was yielded before I shortened the names:
prog.cc: In substitution of 'template Y(U, const Ts& ...)-> X::Y [with U = 128]':
pro
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
int main() {
int f(int(&&)[1]);
int f(int(&&)[2]);
f({1});
}
The list initialization sequence specified by [over.ics.list]
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
template
void f(T..., U...) {}
int main() {f();}
---
This shouldn't compile. Although U is deduced to the empty pac
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
Related to https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49058
---
#include
int main() {
int i;
std::bind([] (auto& x) {x = 1;}, i)();
}
---
This is rejected bec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80564
--- Comment #6 from Robert Haberlach ---
(In reply to TC from comment #4)
> (In reply to Eric Fiselier from comment #3)
> > Here is an example of why `_Bind::operator()(...) const` must be considered
> > during overload resolution even if the cal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80564
--- Comment #7 from Robert Haberlach ---
Oh, damn. "Submit only my new comment" does not what I thought it does. :-)
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
constexpr int f(int const& x) {return x;}
constexpr struct S {
int x = 0;
constexpr S() {(void)f(x); x = 1;}
} s;
static_assert(f(s.x) == 1, "");
---
Pre
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
int main() {
struct A {
int x, i = [&] { return x; }();
} a{0};
}
-
> error: 'this' was
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11407
Robert Haberlach changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||colu...@gmx-topmail.de
--- Comment
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
constexpr struct X {
X const& x = *this;
} y {{}};
This is valid as of core issue
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
When compiling Testing.cxx from
https://github.com/Arcoth/Constainer/blob/9a96ba3089778fe655fde2334701077e2d6c8f35/Testing.cxx#L91,
GCC bails out at the end:
/home/arcoth/Programming/Constainer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66292
--- Comment #2 from Columbo ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> Please provide a preprocessed source file (does not have to be reduced).
The file is larger than 1000kb. It consists of 88000 lines.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66292
--- Comment #4 from Columbo ---
Created attachment 35630
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35630&action=edit
Testcase for 66292
ty: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
template
struct outer
{
template struct inner {};
template struct inner {};
};
This fails to compile, al
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
void f(auto i) {requires {i;};}
int main() {f(0);}
=>
prog.cc: In instantiation of 'void f(auto:1) [with auto:1 = int]':
prog.cc:3:16: required from here
prog.cc:1
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
auto l = [] {};
struct s {friend void decltype(l)::operator()() const;};
The above spuriously succeeds.
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
void f(int(&)[]);
This fails, although made well-formed as of core issue 393. Note that a fix
should presumably take EWG 118 into account.
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
The following code spuriously fails, because a "conversion to non-const
reference type 'struct main()::A&' from rvalue of type 'main()::A'" is
necessitated:
-
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
void a();
void f() {
class A {
friend void ::a();
friend class Z;
};
}
---
The above fails for two (false) reasons, although it shouldn't. a is qualified,
ther
: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: colu...@gmx-topmail.de
Target Milestone: ---
struct A {int arr[3] {1, 2, 3};} constexpr a{};
static_assert( a.arr != a.arr+3 );
This fails with 20150813, while it shouldn't. [expr.const]/(2.19) states that
the r
23 matches
Mail list logo
