[Bug c++/33501] New: Copy constructor assumed to exist for undefined class

2007-09-19 Thread ciobi at inbox dot com
Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ciobi at inbox dot com GCC build triplet: x86_64-suse-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux GCC target triplet: x86_64-suse-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33501

[Bug c/37648] New: Incorrect warning "flag ignored with precision" in printf

2008-09-25 Thread ciobi at inbox dot com
printf Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ciobi at inbox dot com GCC build triplet: x86_64-suse-linux GCC hos

[Bug c/37648] Incorrect warning "flag ignored with precision" in printf

2008-09-29 Thread ciobi at inbox dot com
--- Comment #2 from ciobi at inbox dot com 2008-09-29 14:30 --- Sorry. The reason I said that the '0' flag was not actually ignored was that I was sure that without it the padding would be done with spaces rather than '0'. I guess some time ago I was using a compile

[Bug c++/41427] New: variables with the same name as a "for" variable should be invalid

2009-09-21 Thread ciobi at inbox dot com
ssigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: ciobi at inbox dot com GCC build triplet: x86_64-suse-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-suse-linux GCC target triplet: x86_64-suse-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41427