--
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian dot joensson at
||gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||christian dot joensson at
||gmail dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 11:03 ---
well, running this:
# sparc32 ./gcc/contrib/test_installed --without-gcc --without-g77
--without-objc
I get this:
Running /usr/local/src/trunk/gcc/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/pch/pch.exp ...
FAIL: g
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 18:05 ---
well, I can't find the large test in the c++ pch testsuite. And, from the test
results posted here http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00244.html
I can't tell if the largefi
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 19:23 ---
oh, the last one was run with gcc cvs trunk LAST_UPDATED: Thu Jan 6 20:22:33
UTC 2005
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19300
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-07 19:21 ---
This is what I find about largefile in the c testsuite:
Executing on host: /usr/local/src/trunk/objdir32/gcc/xgcc
-B/usr/local/src/trun\k/objdir32/gcc/ ./largefile.h -O0 -g -o largefile.h.gch
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-10 07:32 ---
These PCH problems does not occur on the current 3.4 branch:
See test results at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-01/msg00353.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-17 12:18 ---
how's it going?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18615
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-01-18 08:18 ---
without the libjava tests having run through, this is what I have right now
(posting of full test results will come later today)
Aurora SPARC Linux Corona (FC3-ish) UltraSparc IIi (Sabre) sun4u
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-02-12 21:48 ---
This does indeed look promising, compare the test results for sparc-linux at
LAST_UPDATED: Fri Feb 11 13:36:22 UTC 2005, without the patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8174&ac
--- Additional Comments From christian dot joensson at gmail dot com
2005-02-14 15:56 ---
Again, same checkout, but built for sparc64-linux, test results *with
phython's patch* posted here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2005-02/msg00566.html
Will start a build *without
--- Comment #46 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-11-10
09:08 ---
(In reply to comment #45)
> Created an attachment (id=12575)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12575&action=view) [edit]
> Linker fix for !HAVE_COMDAT_GROUP breakage
>
--- Comment #9 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-11-28
09:17 ---
ping
any news on this one?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28870
--- Comment #26 from christian dot joensson at gmail dot com 2006-12-15
09:03 ---
I would just like to say that I see this on sparc64-linux too on the 4.2
branch.
Aurora SPARC Linux release 2.90 (Aurora Corona)/TI UltraSparc IIi (Sabre)
sun4u:
binutils-2.17.50.0.3-6.sparc.sparc
bison
101 - 115 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
