http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52556
Bug #: 52556
Summary: Ability to change GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Prio
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52556
--- Comment #1 from Christer Solskogen
2012-03-11 12:54:45 UTC ---
I see now that the google gcc branch is having this kind of ability. Any plans
of integrating them?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52556
--- Comment #3 from Christer Solskogen
2012-03-11 15:50:57 UTC ---
I could, but is not a sexy(*) as --with-runtime-root-prefix :-)
*) http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/80538/
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: christer.solskogen at gmail dot com
CC: marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
I've been experimenting with amiberry
(https://github.com/midwan/amiberry/tree/dev) a Amiga emulator to compile it
wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97637
--- Comment #2 from Christer Solskogen ---
You are correct. I've replaced Ofast with O2 (but it doesn't seem to matter
that much) - with the default inline-unit-growth the binary gets 5% bigger.
With inline-unit-growth=20 the binary gets 5%~ sma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97637
--- Comment #4 from Christer Solskogen ---
Okay, so LTO together with O2/O3 or Ofast will not help code size that much.
I was worried that something was wrong with how GCC was configured or the
command line parameters I was using since the binar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97637
Christer Solskogen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67590
Christer Solskogen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||christer.solskogen at gmail
dot co
