|--- |11.0
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |charlet at gcc dot
gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfirmed||2020-06-29
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95953
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon at pushface dot org
--- Comment #
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95953
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 95953 ***
|--- |WORKSFORME
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Charlet ---
It shouldn't fail since the error is supposed to be ignored:
-if [ -f gnat1$(exeext) ] ; \
[...]
as you can imagine, everyone else would have rep
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Charlet ---
You cannot build GNAT with a more recent version of GNAT in general, as
explained in https
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Charlet 2013-02-14
08:46:33 UTC ---
This was an unintended change, reverted right away.
I would suggest always checking with current trunk before opening
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54820
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54845
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54845
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet 2012-10-10
08:09:33 UTC ---
Author: charlet
Date: Wed Oct 10 08:09:25 2012
New Revision: 192290
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=192290
Log:
2012-10-10 Arnaud Charlet
PR ad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54845
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
--- Comment #7 from Arnaud Charlet 2011-08-31
07:04:21 UTC ---
Closing then:
$ gcc -c test_244943.ads
test_244943.ads:4:26: discriminants of
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
--- Comment #7 from Arnaud Charlet 2011-08-31
07:05:33 UTC ---
Closing then
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.1
Known to fail||
--- Comment #6 from Arnaud Charlet 2011-09-01
06:33:31 UTC ---
Closing then, thanks for
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
--- Comment #6 from Arnaud Charlet 2011-09-16
17:30:48 UTC ---
Fixing then, thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54125
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54125
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet 2012-08-06
08:12:18 UTC ---
Author: charlet
Date: Mon Aug 6 08:12:10 2012
New Revision: 190163
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=190163
Log:
2012-08-06 Vincent Pucci
PR ada/54125
*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54125
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #11 from Arnaud Charlet 2012-02-04
10:00:33 UTC ---
Closing then.
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet 2012-02-08
07:46:25 UTC ---
Indeed, closing then.
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Charlet 2012-02-09
20:02:07 UTC ---
You didn't provide sufficient info.
The error looks like an error with your environment (e.g. bad behavior of
make),
and GCC b
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet 2011-11-28
09:48:39 UTC ---
Here is the patch from Thomas Quinot fixing this issue, I'll c
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51307
--- Comment #7 from Arnaud Charlet 2011-12-05
10:32:03 UTC ---
Author: charlet
Date: Mon Dec 5 10:31:58 2011
New Revision: 182004
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182004
Log:
2011-12-05 Bob Duff
* sem_ch3.adb (Deriv
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51307
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
--- Comment #8 from Arnaud Charl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15846
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet 2012-01-30
12:15:54 UTC ---
Author: charlet
Date: Mon Jan 30 12:15:42 2012
New Revision: 183713
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=183713
Log:
2012-01-30 Javier Miranda
PR ada/15846
*
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
--- Comment #5 from Arnaud Charlet 2012-01-30
12:17:47 UTC ---
Fixed on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86211
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86211
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66205
--- Comment #13 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Tue Dec 19 08:43:49 2017
New Revision: 255811
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=255811&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/66205
* bindgen.adb (Gen_AdaFinal): Revert previous cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66205
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |charlet at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #18 from Arnaud Charlet ---
To summarize the problem on this PE: the issue is that GNAT switched from SJLJ
to ZCX exception handling from GCC 7 to GCC 8, causing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590
--- Comment #19 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Mon Jun 17 07:32:14 2019
New Revision: 272372
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272372&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/80590
* exp_ch9.adb (Expand_N_Delay_Relative_Statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590
--- Comment #20 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Mon Jun 17 07:34:04 2019
New Revision: 272373
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272373&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/80590
* exp_ch9.adb (Expand_N_Delay_Relative_Statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590
--- Comment #21 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Mon Jun 17 07:35:02 2019
New Revision: 272374
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272374&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/80590
* exp_ch9.adb (Expand_N_Delay_Relative_Statement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590
--- Comment #23 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Tue Jun 18 11:44:58 2019
New Revision: 272416
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272416&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/80590
* sem_ch5.adb (Analyze_Loop_Statement): Avoid ex
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80590
--- Comment #24 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Tue Jun 18 11:45:37 2019
New Revision: 272417
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=272417&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/80590
* sem_ch5.adb (Analyze_Loop_Statement): Avoid ex
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Good point, closing PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88191
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet 2013-01-04
10:19:48 UTC ---
This is already fixed actually.
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Charlet ---
You must use an older (or equal) version of GNAT to build GNAT, using a more
recent version won't work in general, as shown by this PR, and isn't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80888
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Fri Sep 8 09:38:38 2017
New Revision: 251874
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251874&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2017-09-08 Bob Duff
PR ada/80888
* a-textio.adb, a-witeio.a
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Should be fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82141
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78845
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Tue Apr 25 12:44:16 2017
New Revision: 247214
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=247214&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/78845
* a-ngcoar.adb, a-ngrear.adb (Inverse): c
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Arnaud Charlet ---
patch is now committed.
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet ---
GNAT always orders messages by source location, so this will simply not happen,
closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64057
--- Comment #5 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Wed Oct 12 10:32:53 2016
New Revision: 241025
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241025&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-12 Eric Botcazou
PR ada/64057
* exp_ch5.adb
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
--- Comment #6 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Should hopefully be fixed now.
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Charlet ---
You need a matching (built with same sources) native first to build a
cross, I suspect that's the issue here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61201
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Charlet ---
The build of GNAT cross is designed to rely on a matching native, to simplify
the
set up, so this is really as designed here, and not just a 'search path
problem'.
The coupling between the Ada runtime and t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
--- Comment #9 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Wed May 21 12:49:24 2014
New Revision: 210698
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=210698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Previous change (rev 210697) should have mentioned PR ada/9535:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9535
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56274
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.10.0
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Charlet ---
This was an oversight, fixed right after.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Sat Jun 14 06:55:49 2014
New Revision: 211665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=211665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/61505
* gnat_rm.texi: Attempt to fix error with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505
--- Comment #5 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Never mind, I'm using makeinfo 4.8, so this is indeed another issue.
Let me know if my latest commit improves things.
Arno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61505
--- Comment #9 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Patch looks reasonable to me at first sight, can you please post it to
gcc-patches for a final review and approval? Thanks for looking into it!
Arno
||2015-03-23
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Sounds interesting/puzzling. But we really need a reproducer/test case to work
from.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65524
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|ada |c
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Closing then
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Version|4.5.1 |4.7.2
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Closing then, thanks!
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #6 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Not having libgnat.a around is unexpected from gnatmake's point of view, so it
cannot be considered as a bug, or rather, a bug in the linux distrib.
Arno
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Fri Mar 7 20:35:33 2014
New Revision: 208419
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208419&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-03-07 Doug Rupp
PR ada/60411
* system-linux-armel.ads (B
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60411
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Actually Ada does not make any guarantee when mixing ATC and system calls and
indeed, it is fundamentally unsafe if not impossible to properly abort from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68345
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68345
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Sat Nov 14 09:09:01 2015
New Revision: 230373
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230373&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-13 Arnaud Charlet
PR ada/68345
* s-osinte-d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68345
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66242
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Wed Nov 18 10:30:12 2015
New Revision: 230531
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230531&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-18 Hristian Kirtchev
PR ada/66242
* exp_ch
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #5 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Should be properly implemented now.
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet ---
was fixed on revision 230617
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Wed Jan 7 10:15:18 2015
New Revision: 219290
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219290&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-07 Vincent Celier
* clean.adb: Minor error message chan
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
--- Comment #12 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Fri Jan 30 15:13:15 2015
New Revision: 220285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220285&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-30 Tristan Gingold
PR ada/64349
* env.c: Move vxwo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
--- Comment #15 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Thu Feb 5 09:09:51 2015
New Revision: 220437
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220437&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-05 Tristan Gingold
PR ada/64349
* env.c: Fix think
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64349
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Visibility in the Ada runtime do not follow standard Ada rules. In other words,
the Ada runtime isn't implemented in Ada, but in a different dialect
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Charlet ---
I would suggest you do not use 'private with' if you write your own runtime,
since this isn't supported by the compiler when building th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65104
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65104
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet ---
This one will get fixed when gnat_rm.texi is converted to sphinx (will happen
soon).
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet ---
The test is actually wrong, which is now exhibited by a recent fix in the
runtime.
I forgot to remove it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65156
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Sat Feb 21 18:57:02 2015
New Revision: 220889
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220889&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/65156
* gnat.dg/timing_events.adb: Removed, invalid test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65259
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Sun Mar 1 10:16:20 2015
New Revision: 221087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/65259
* doc/gnat_ugn/gnat_project_manager.rst,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65259
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63695
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63695
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63695
--- Comment #5 from Arnaud Charlet ---
The addition of pragma No_Elaboration_Code_All in system.ads, which wasn't
properly supported by your bootstrap compiler.
In order to bootstrap with this change you either need an older compiler which
doesn
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Version|4.4.2 |4.9.1
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Closing then, thanks for checking
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48002
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #2 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Closing.
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
--- Comment #3 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42978
--- Comment #8 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Note that support for project files (and libraries) in gnatmake is being
deprecated in favor of gprbuild, so this patch will soon become OBE.
But no problem in applying it now.
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Not sure what you mean. Aren't you confusing minor and micro versions?
We do want 5.0 like we had 4.9/4.8/4.7/... previously, so this looks as
expect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47500
--- Comment #8 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Thu Nov 20 11:55:25 2014
New Revision: 217849
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217849&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-20 Vincent Celier
PR ada/47500
* back_end.adb (Scan
||charlet at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|4.8.4 |5.0
--- Comment #9 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Fixed on trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63931
--- Comment #6 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Author: charlet
Date: Thu Nov 20 16:17:12 2014
New Revision: 217884
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217884&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/63931
* gnatvsn.ads (
1 - 100 of 149 matches
Mail list logo