nassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: cfriedt at visible-assets dot com
GCC build triplet: i686-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: armv4t-linux-gnueabi
GCC target triplet: armv4t-linux-gnueabi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40586
--- Comment #1 from cfriedt at visible-assets dot com 2009-06-29 12:33
---
Created an attachment (id=18090)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=18090&action=view)
config.log
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40586
--
Summary: In function `fold_builtin_1': undefined reference to
`mpfr_j0'
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gn
--- Comment #1 from cfriedt at visible-assets dot com 2008-09-23 18:31
---
Created an attachment (id=16397)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=16397&action=view)
output of 'gcc -v -save-temps'
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37627
--- Comment #4 from cfriedt at visible-assets dot com 2010-04-30 09:54
---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Please consider this patch. It adds support for obtaining file basename via
> __FILE_BASENAME__.
Please do!
What would also be really nice would be to have similar functio
--- Comment #13 from cfriedt at visible-assets dot com 2007-11-30 15:25
---
Is there a release of gcc where is this problem fixed, or is it only in the
repository?
I've been running into this problem for the last 2 days and was working around
the clock, assuming that somethin
--- Comment #15 from cfriedt at visible-assets dot com 2007-11-30 15:48
---
Right - I guess I should make the Gentoo folks aware of this, because in their
current tree anything >= 4.2.0 is marked as unstable.
Thanks for the reply.
(In reply to comment #14)
> As you can see fr
