--- Comment #25 from cesarb at cesarb dot net 2007-08-21 10:54 ---
The testcase seems to be missing one case where it should warn:
class H
{
protected:
~H();
public:
virtual void deleteme() = 0;
};
H::~H()
{
}
void
H::deleteme()
{
delete this;
}
class I
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54201
--- Comment #3 from Cesar Eduardo Barros 2012-08-08
23:28:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 27964
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27964
Another testcase
Another testcase. This one also shows it using two registers instead of one.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54446
Bug #: 54446
Summary: Stack needlessly aligned with AVX
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54446
--- Comment #1 from Cesar Eduardo Barros 2012-09-01
01:23:48 UTC ---
Created attachment 28114
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28114
testcase
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54201
Bug #: 54201
Summary: XMM constant duplicated
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54201
--- Comment #1 from Cesar Eduardo Barros 2012-08-08
11:32:37 UTC ---
Created attachment 27961
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27961
Assembly output
