[Bug rtl-optimization/79032] New: Unaligned memory access in code generated for sparc 32 with LRA

Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cederman at gaisler dot com Target Milestone: --- Target: sparc Hi, The following code compiled with -O2 -mcpu=v8 -mlra causes an unaligned memory access: typedef

[Bug rtl-optimization/79032] [7 regression] unaligned memory access generated with LRA and optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79032 --- Comment #9 from Daniel Cederman --- Thanks for fixing it so quickly. Everything seems to be working now on my side.

[Bug lto/61192] New: Conflict between register and function name for lto on sparc

Priority: P3 Component: lto Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cederman at gaisler dot com Created attachment 32799 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32799&action=edit Preprocessed files This line in the attached preprocess

[Bug lto/61192] Conflict between register and function name for lto on sparc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61192 --- Comment #3 from Daniel Cederman --- (In reply to Ilya Palachev from comment #2) > (In reply to Daniel Cederman from comment #0) > > when using lto on sparc. > > Daniel, can you also provide original source code (not preprocessed)? It's > int

[Bug tree-optimization/64193] New: Decreased performance after r173250

-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cederman at gaisler dot com Target: i686-build_pc-linux-gnu Created attachment 34196 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34196&action=edit preprocessed source When comparing version 4.4

[Bug tree-optimization/64193] Decreased performance after r173250

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64193 --- Comment #1 from Daniel Cederman --- Created attachment 34197 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34197&action=edit assembly output with r173250

[Bug tree-optimization/64193] Decreased performance after r173250

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64193 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Cederman --- Created attachment 34198 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34198&action=edit assembly output without r173250

[Bug tree-optimization/64193] [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Decreased performance after r173250

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64193 --- Comment #5 from Daniel Cederman --- > Probably the regression was mitigated by the partial fix for PR63677: Yes, that seems to be the case for my attached example. Do you think that the regression is mitigated in general, or is your attached

[Bug rtl-optimization/102306] New: Volatile pointer dereferenced twice

-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: cederman at gaisler dot com CC: ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr, segher at kernel dot crashing.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 51448 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51

[Bug target/107248] wrong scheduling of stack adjustment in leaf function at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107248 Daniel Cederman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cederman at gaisler dot com